DEFACTUM-Public Health and Health Services Research, Aarhus, Denmark.
The Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Health Soc Care Community. 2019 Mar;27(2):502-515. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12671. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
There is a growing body of literature on sustainability, but its definition and the factors that affect it are not well understood. This paper focuses on the sustainment of health promotion interventions in community mental health organisations, where the institutional context has been found to play an important role. Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) was used to characterise the extent of sustainment of health promotion interventions and to identify important factors that influence it. The study builds on a previously reported qualitative multiple case design focusing on four Danish community mental health organisations. We aimed to include cases (provider organisations) with varied political-administrative contexts that were expected to impact sustainment. Data included 27 semistructured interviews with managers and frontline staff. The analysis adopted a thematic approach combining within-case and cross-case analysis. One important factor contributing to sustainment was the high degree of coherence generated during and after implementation. Perceptions of meaningfulness and formal tools for external accountability such as municipal activity plans also stimulated the cognitive participation of management and staff in sustaining the intervention. On the practical level of collective action, working with health promotion in a continuous way was particularly supported by two formal tools: internal health policies and municipal activity plans. Sustainment was further aided by reflexive monitoring based on ongoing informal assessments, supplemented by information required for status reports to the municipality on individual users and information from the annual individual user health checks. Future studies should adapt NPT to a broader range of cases to assess more thoroughly its contribution to the literature on sustainment. Future interventions need to pay closer attention to securing continuous and active local management support as well as to political-administrative contexts as potential external drivers of sustainment.
可持续性方面的文献越来越多,但人们对其定义和影响因素的理解还不够深入。本文专注于社区心理健康组织中健康促进干预措施的维持,因为已经发现机构背景对其起到了重要作用。本研究采用了规范化进程理论(NPT)来描述健康促进干预措施的维持程度,并确定影响其维持的重要因素。该研究是在先前报道的一项以丹麦四家社区心理健康组织为重点的定性多案例设计基础上进行的。我们旨在纳入具有不同政治行政背景的案例(提供方组织),这些背景预计会对维持产生影响。数据包括对管理人员和一线工作人员进行的 27 次半结构化访谈。分析采用了主题分析方法,结合了案例内和跨案例分析。一个有助于维持的重要因素是在实施过程中和实施后产生的高度一致性。对有意义性的看法和外部问责制的正式工具(如市活动计划)也激发了管理层和员工对维持干预措施的认知参与。在集体行动的实际层面上,以持续的方式开展健康促进工作特别得益于两个正式工具:内部健康政策和市活动计划。基于持续非正式评估的反思性监测,以及向市政府报告个别使用者的信息和年度个别使用者健康检查的信息,也进一步促进了维持。未来的研究应该将 NPT 应用于更广泛的案例,以更全面地评估其对维持文献的贡献。未来的干预措施需要更加关注确保持续和积极的地方管理层支持,以及关注政治行政背景,因为它们可能是维持的外部驱动因素。