Suppr超能文献

单脉冲 TMS 方法学考虑因素对追赶性眼球跳动的影响。

Ups and downs in catch-up saccades following single-pulse TMS-methodological considerations.

机构信息

Aix Marseille University, CNRS, Institut de Neurosciences de la Timone UMR 7289, Marseille, France.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Oct 11;13(10):e0205208. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205208. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can interfere with smooth pursuit or with saccades initiated from a fixed position toward a fixed target, but little is known about the effect of TMS on catch-up saccade made to assist smooth pursuit. Here we explored the effect of TMS on catch-up saccades by means of a situation in which the moving target was driven by an external agent, or moved by the participants' hand, a condition known to decrease the occurrence of catch-up saccade. Two sites of stimulation were tested, the vertex and M1 hand area. Compared to conditions with no TMS, we found a consistent modulation of saccadic activity after TMS such that it decreased at 40-100ms, strongly resumed at 100-160ms, and then decreased at 200-300ms. Despite this modulatory effect, the accuracy of catch-up saccade was maintained, and the mean saccadic activity over the 0-300ms period remained unchanged. Those findings are discussed in the context of studies showing that single-pulse TMS can induce widespread effects on neural oscillations as well as perturbations in the latency of saccades during reaction time protocols. At a more general level, despite challenges and interpretational limitations making uncertain the origin of this modulatory effect, our study provides direct evidence that TMS over presumably non-oculomotor regions interferes with the initiation of catch-up saccades, and thus offers methodological considerations for future studies that wish to investigate the underlying neural circuitry of catch-up saccades using TMS.

摘要

经颅磁刺激(TMS)可以干扰平滑追踪或从固定位置向固定目标发起的扫视,但对于 TMS 对辅助平滑追踪的追迹扫视的影响知之甚少。在这里,我们通过一种外部驱动的运动目标或由参与者手部驱动的运动目标的情况来探索 TMS 对追迹扫视的影响,这种情况已知会减少追迹扫视的发生。我们测试了两个刺激部位,顶点和 M1 手部区域。与没有 TMS 的情况相比,我们发现 TMS 后扫视活动的一致调制,即在 40-100ms 时减少,在 100-160ms 时强烈恢复,然后在 200-300ms 时减少。尽管存在这种调制效应,但追迹扫视的准确性得以维持,并且 0-300ms 期间的平均扫视活动保持不变。这些发现是在研究的背景下讨论的,这些研究表明,单次脉冲 TMS 可以诱导神经振荡的广泛影响,以及在反应时间协议期间扫视潜伏期的干扰。在更一般的层面上,尽管存在挑战和解释限制,使得这种调制效应的起源不确定,但我们的研究提供了直接证据,表明 TMS 对非眼动区域的刺激会干扰追迹扫视的启动,从而为希望使用 TMS 研究追迹扫视的潜在神经回路的未来研究提供了方法学考虑。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b63/6181330/d63b2f50bb24/pone.0205208.g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验