• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

模式化相对随机声音序列的增强偏差反应。

Enhanced deviant responses in patterned relative to random sound sequences.

机构信息

Ear Institute, University College London, London, UK.

Ear Institute, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Cortex. 2018 Dec;109:92-103. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.08.032. Epub 2018 Sep 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.cortex.2018.08.032
PMID:30312781
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6259587/
Abstract

The brain draws on knowledge of statistical structure in the environment to facilitate detection of new events. Understanding the nature of this representation is a key challenge in sensory neuroscience. Specifically, it is unknown whether real-time perception of rapidly-unfolding sensory signals is driven by a coarse or detailed representation of the proximal stimulus history. We recorded electroencephalography brain responses to frequency outliers in regularly-patterned (REG) versus random (RAND) tone-pip sequences which were generated anew on each trial. REG and RAND sequences were matched in frequency content and span, only differing in the specific order of the tone-pips. Stimuli were very rapid, limiting conscious reasoning in favour of automatic processing of regularity. Listeners were naïve and performed an incidental visual task. Outliers within REG evoked a larger response than matched outliers in RAND. These effects arose rapidly (within 80 msec) and were underpinned by distinct sources from those classically associated with frequency-based deviance detection. These findings are consistent with the notion that the brain continually maintains a detailed representation of ongoing sensory input and that this representation shapes the processing of incoming information. Predominantly auditory-cortical sources code for frequency deviance whilst frontal sources are associated with tracking more complex sequence structure.

摘要

大脑利用环境中统计结构的知识来促进新事件的检测。理解这种表示的本质是感觉神经科学的一个关键挑战。具体来说,尚不清楚实时感知快速展开的感觉信号是由近端刺激历史的粗略表示还是详细表示驱动的。我们记录了脑电图对规则(REG)与随机(RAND)音调序列中频率异常值的脑反应,这些序列在每次试验中都是新生成的。REG 和 RAND 序列在频率内容和跨度上匹配,仅在音调的具体顺序上有所不同。刺激非常快,限制了有意识的推理,有利于自动处理规律性。听众是天真的,执行附带的视觉任务。REG 中的异常值比 RAND 中匹配的异常值引起更大的反应。这些效应在 80 毫秒内迅速出现,并且由与经典的基于频率偏差检测相关的来源不同的来源支持。这些发现与大脑不断保持对正在进行的感觉输入的详细表示的概念一致,并且这种表示塑造了传入信息的处理。主要的听觉皮质源对频率偏差进行编码,而额叶源则与跟踪更复杂的序列结构有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8af/6259587/fb20c1cc16a0/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8af/6259587/4f80e16de0c5/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8af/6259587/22c345d09f5d/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8af/6259587/fb20c1cc16a0/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8af/6259587/4f80e16de0c5/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8af/6259587/22c345d09f5d/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8af/6259587/fb20c1cc16a0/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Enhanced deviant responses in patterned relative to random sound sequences.模式化相对随机声音序列的增强偏差反应。
Cortex. 2018 Dec;109:92-103. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.08.032. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
2
Transitional Probabilities Are Prioritized over Stimulus/Pattern Probabilities in Auditory Deviance Detection: Memory Basis for Predictive Sound Processing.在听觉偏差检测中,转换概率优先于刺激/模式概率:预测性声音处理的记忆基础。
J Neurosci. 2016 Sep 14;36(37):9572-9. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1041-16.2016.
3
Concurrent Encoding of Sequence Predictability and Event-Evoked Prediction Error in Unfolding Auditory Patterns.听觉模式展开过程中序列可预测性和事件诱发预测误差的并发编码。
J Neurosci. 2024 Apr 3;44(14):e1894232024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1894-23.2024.
4
Prediction error signaling explains neuronal mismatch responses in the medial prefrontal cortex.预测误差信号解释了内侧前额叶皮层神经元失配反应。
PLoS Biol. 2020 Dec 21;18(12):e3001019. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001019. eCollection 2020 Dec.
5
Encoding of nested levels of acoustic regularity in hierarchically organized areas of the human auditory cortex.人类听觉皮层分层组织区域中声学规律性嵌套水平的编码。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 Nov;35(11):5701-16. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22582. Epub 2014 Jul 4.
6
Differential deviant probability effects on two hierarchical levels of the auditory novelty system.差异偏差概率对听觉新奇系统两个层次水平的影响。
Biol Psychol. 2016 Oct;120:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2016.08.001. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
7
Functional dissociation between regularity encoding and deviance detection along the auditory hierarchy.沿听觉层级结构的规律性编码与偏差检测之间的功能分离。
Eur J Neurosci. 2016 Feb;43(4):529-35. doi: 10.1111/ejn.13138. Epub 2015 Dec 31.
8
Neural representations of auditory input accommodate to the context in a dynamically changing acoustic environment.在动态变化的声学环境中,听觉输入的神经表征会根据环境进行调整。
Eur J Neurosci. 2009 Jan;29(1):205-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06561.x. Epub 2008 Dec 12.
9
The representation of unattended, segmented sounds: a mismatch negativity (MMN) study.未被注意的、被分割声音的表现:失匹配负波(MMN)研究。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2011 Aug;81(2):121-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.05.001. Epub 2011 May 19.
10
Effects of task-switching on neural representations of ambiguous sound input.任务切换对模糊声音输入的神经表征的影响。
Neuropsychologia. 2014 Nov;64:218-29. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.09.039. Epub 2014 Sep 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Deviance detection and regularity sensitivity in dissociated neuronal cultures.解离神经元培养中的偏差检测与规律敏感性
Front Neural Circuits. 2025 Aug 25;19:1584322. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2025.1584322. eCollection 2025.
2
Predictive processes shape individual musical preferences.预测过程塑造了个人的音乐偏好。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jul 22;122(29):e2500494122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2500494122. Epub 2025 Jul 15.
3
The role of inhibitory neurons in novelty sound detection in regular and random statistical contexts.

本文引用的文献

1
Neurons along the auditory pathway exhibit a hierarchical organization of prediction error.听觉通路上的神经元表现出预测误差的分层组织。
Nat Commun. 2017 Dec 15;8(1):2148. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02038-6.
2
Great Expectations: Is there Evidence for Predictive Coding in Auditory Cortex?高期望:听觉皮层中存在预测编码的证据吗?
Neuroscience. 2018 Oct 1;389:54-73. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.07.061. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
3
The Cumulative Effects of Predictability on Synaptic Gain in the Auditory Processing Stream.可预测性对听觉处理流中突触增益的累积效应。
抑制性神经元在规则和随机统计背景下对新奇声音检测中的作用。
bioRxiv. 2025 May 2:2025.04.20.649735. doi: 10.1101/2025.04.20.649735.
4
EEG Correlates of Auditory Short-Term Memory and Dissimilarity Perception in Young and Older Adults.年轻人和老年人听觉短期记忆与差异感知的脑电图相关性
Eur J Neurosci. 2025 Jun;61(12):e70166. doi: 10.1111/ejn.70166.
5
Attenuated processing of vowels in the left temporal cortex predicts speech-in-noise perception deficit in children with autism.左侧颞叶皮质中元音处理能力减弱预示着自闭症儿童在噪声环境下的言语感知缺陷。
J Neurodev Disord. 2024 Dec 6;16(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s11689-024-09585-2.
6
RDoC Framework Through the Lens of Predictive Processing: Focusing on Cognitive Systems Domain.基于预测处理视角的研究领域标准(RDoC)框架:聚焦认知系统领域
Comput Psychiatr. 2024 Oct 30;8(1):178-201. doi: 10.5334/cpsy.119. eCollection 2024.
7
Concurrent Encoding of Sequence Predictability and Event-Evoked Prediction Error in Unfolding Auditory Patterns.听觉模式展开过程中序列可预测性和事件诱发预测误差的并发编码。
J Neurosci. 2024 Apr 3;44(14):e1894232024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1894-23.2024.
8
Context changes judgments of liking and predictability for melodies.情境会改变对旋律的喜好判断和可预测性。
Front Psychol. 2023 Nov 15;14:1175682. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1175682. eCollection 2023.
9
Neural signatures of automatic repetition detection in temporally regular and jittered acoustic sequences.在时间规则和抖动的声学序列中自动重复检测的神经特征。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 10;18(11):e0284836. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284836. eCollection 2023.
10
Brain-imaging evidence for compression of binary sound sequences in human memory.人脑记忆中对二进制声音序列压缩的脑成像证据。
Elife. 2023 Nov 1;12:e84376. doi: 10.7554/eLife.84376.
J Neurosci. 2017 Jul 12;37(28):6751-6760. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0291-17.2017. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
4
Lateral orbitofrontal cortex anticipates choices and integrates prior with current information.外侧眶额皮层预测选择,并整合先前与当前信息。
Nat Commun. 2017 Mar 24;8:14823. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14823.
5
Is predictability salient? A study of attentional capture by auditory patterns.可预测性是否显著?一项关于听觉模式引起的注意捕获的研究。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017 Feb 19;372(1714). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0105. Epub 2017 Jan 2.
6
Detecting and representing predictable structure during auditory scene analysis.在听觉场景分析中检测并呈现可预测结构。
Elife. 2016 Sep 7;5:e19113. doi: 10.7554/eLife.19113.
7
Silent Expectations: Dynamic Causal Modeling of Cortical Prediction and Attention to Sounds That Weren't.无声的期望:对皮层预测及对未出现声音的注意力的动态因果模型
J Neurosci. 2016 Aug 10;36(32):8305-16. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1125-16.2016.
8
The Representation of Prediction Error in Auditory Cortex.听觉皮层中预测误差的表征。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2016 Aug 4;12(8):e1005058. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005058. eCollection 2016 Aug.
9
Convergent evidence for hierarchical prediction networks from human electrocorticography and magnetoencephalography.来自人类脑电描记术和脑磁图的分层预测网络的汇聚证据。
Cortex. 2016 Sep;82:192-205. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.05.001. Epub 2016 May 10.
10
Neural Correlates of Auditory Figure-Ground Segregation Based on Temporal Coherence.基于时间连贯性的听觉图形-背景分离的神经关联
Cereb Cortex. 2016 Sep;26(9):3669-80. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhw173. Epub 2016 Jun 19.