• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

妇科机器人腹腔镜单孔手术:一项系统综述。

Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecology: A systematic review.

作者信息

Matanes Emad, Lauterbach Roy, Boulus Sari, Amit Amnon, Lowenstein Lior

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel; Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Haifa, Israel.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel; Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Haifa, Israel.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018 Dec;231:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.10.006. Epub 2018 Oct 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.10.006
PMID:30317138
Abstract

Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site (R-LESS) seems to be the next route in advancing minimal invasive surgery, with the potential for better cosmetic results and reduced patient morbidity compared with multi-port surgery. This review describes the history and development of (R-LESS) gynecologic surgery and outlines the latest advancements in the realm of gynecology. The review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Pubmed and ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov) were the main search engines utilized for retrieval of study data (1990 - present). The following subject headings and keywords were searched: "robotic laparoscopic single incision", "robotic laparoendoscopic single site", "single incision robotic surgery" and "single-port robotic surgery". All original research articles including randomized, non-randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, patient series, and case reports were included. The search produced a total of 1127 results. After duplicate removal, 452 remained, and each title and abstract was reviewed by 2 reviewers. Subsequently, 56 full texts were selected for full review and an additional 20 excluded, leaving 36 studies that were included in the final review. Based on the data gathered we reached the conclusion that R-LESS surgery is feasible, safe and has equivalent surgical outcomes as conventional LESS surgery; in addition to shorter recovery times, less postoperative pain and better cosmetic outcomes than robotic multi-port surgery. To conclude, R-LESS is a feasible approach with low complication rates, minimal blood loss and postsurgical pain, fast recovery, and virtually scar-free results. However, the lack of large comparative prospective randomized controlled studies prevents drawing absolute conclusions.

摘要

机器人腹腔镜单孔手术(R-LESS)似乎是推进微创手术的下一个途径,与多端口手术相比,它有可能带来更好的美容效果并降低患者发病率。这篇综述描述了R-LESS妇科手术的历史和发展,并概述了妇科领域的最新进展。该综述是根据PRISMA指南进行的。PubMed和ClinicalTrials.gov(www.clinicaltrials.gov)是用于检索研究数据(1990年至今)的主要搜索引擎。搜索了以下主题词和关键词:“机器人腹腔镜单切口”、“机器人腹腔镜单孔”、“单切口机器人手术”和“单端口机器人手术”。纳入了所有原创研究文章,包括随机、非随机对照试验、队列研究、患者系列和病例报告。搜索共产生1127条结果。去除重复项后,还剩452条,由2名评审员对每个标题和摘要进行评审。随后,选择了56篇全文进行全面评审,另外排除20篇,最终评审纳入36项研究。根据收集到的数据,我们得出结论:R-LESS手术是可行、安全的,手术结果与传统LESS手术相当;此外,与机器人多端口手术相比,恢复时间更短、术后疼痛更少、美容效果更好。总之,R-LESS是一种可行的方法,并发症发生率低、失血少、术后疼痛轻、恢复快,几乎不留疤痕。然而,缺乏大型比较性前瞻性随机对照研究,无法得出绝对结论。

相似文献

1
Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecology: A systematic review.妇科机器人腹腔镜单孔手术:一项系统综述。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018 Dec;231:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.10.006. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
2
Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique.妇科机器人腹腔镜单孔手术:可行性、安全性和技术的前瞻性分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Feb;212(2):179.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.07.057. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
3
Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: which should we use?妇科机器人手术与腹腔镜手术:我们该选用哪种?
Minerva Ginecol. 2016 Aug;68(4):423-30. Epub 2015 Dec 3.
4
Same-Day Discharge in Minimally Invasive Surgery Performed by Gynecologic Oncologists: A Review of Patient Selection.妇科肿瘤学家施行的微创手术当日出院:患者选择的回顾。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 May-Jun;27(4):816-825. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.10.023. Epub 2019 Nov 9.
5
Single-port approach to benign gynecologic pathology. A review.单孔法处理良性妇科病理:综述
Minerva Ginecol. 2015 Jun;67(3):239-47. Epub 2015 Feb 25.
6
Robotic versus laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助与单孔腹腔镜子宫切除术:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Robot Surg. 2020 Oct;14(5):679-686. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01042-1. Epub 2020 Jan 19.
7
[Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecology: the situation in 2013].[妇科腹腔镜单孔手术:2013年的现状]
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2013 Sep;42(5):445-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2013.03.018. Epub 2013 Jun 10.
8
Mortality Rates in Benign Laparoscopic and Robotic Gynecologic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.良性腹腔镜和机器人妇科手术的死亡率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Mar-Apr;27(3):603-612.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.10.005. Epub 2019 Oct 15.
9
Systematic review of robotic surgery in gynecology: robotic techniques compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy.妇科机器人手术的系统评价:机器人技术与腹腔镜手术和剖腹手术的比较
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 May-Jun;21(3):353-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.11.010. Epub 2013 Dec 1.
10
Current status and future directions of robotic single-site surgery: a systematic review.机器人单孔手术的现状和未来方向:系统评价。
Eur Urol. 2013 Feb;63(2):266-80. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.08.028. Epub 2012 Aug 23.

引用本文的文献

1
From practice to perfection-complications and operative time learning curves in benign robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy.从实践到完美——良性机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫切除术中的并发症及手术时间学习曲线
J Robot Surg. 2025 Jun 4;19(1):264. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02429-8.
2
Does Robot Assisted Laparoscopy (RAL) Have an Advantage in Preservation of Ovarian Reserve in Endometriosis Surgery? Comparison of Single-Port Access (SPA) RAL and SPA Laparoscopy.机器人辅助腹腔镜手术(RAL)在子宫内膜异位症手术中保留卵巢储备功能方面是否具有优势?单孔腹腔镜手术(SPA)RAL与SPA腹腔镜手术的比较。
J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 14;12(14):4673. doi: 10.3390/jcm12144673.
3
Single-Incision versus Multiport Robotic Myomectomy: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of Surgical Outcomes and Surgical Tips.
单切口与多端口机器人子宫肌瘤切除术:手术结果及手术技巧的倾向评分匹配分析
J Clin Med. 2021 Aug 31;10(17):3957. doi: 10.3390/jcm10173957.
4
Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse among Peri- and Post-Menopausal Women.机器人辅助腹腔镜手术治疗围绝经期和绝经后女性盆腔器官脱垂
J Menopausal Med. 2020 Dec;26(3):154-158. doi: 10.6118/jmm.20014.
5
Robotic transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for bilateral salpingo oophorectomy.机器人经阴道自然腔道内镜手术双侧输卵管卵巢切除术
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2020 Jun 23;7:100113. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2020.100113. eCollection 2020 Jul.
6
Robotic-assisted single-incision gastric mobilization for minimally invasive oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer: preliminary results.机器人辅助单切口胃游离术用于食管癌的微创食管切除术:初步结果
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Aug 1;58(Suppl_1):i65-i69. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaa212.
7
A comparison of robotic and manual surgery for internal limiting membrane peeling.机器人与手动手术治疗内界膜剥除的比较。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2020 Apr;258(4):773-778. doi: 10.1007/s00417-020-04613-y. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
8
Robotic natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) hysterectomy as a scarless and gasless surgery.机器人经自然腔道内镜手术(NOTES)子宫切除术作为一种无疤痕、无气腹手术。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jan;34(1):492-500. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07115-z. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
9
Robotic-assisted resection of ovarian tumors in children: A case report and review of literature.儿童卵巢肿瘤的机器人辅助切除术:一例报告及文献综述
World J Clin Cases. 2019 Sep 6;7(17):2542-2548. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i17.2542.
10
Robot-assisted hiatal hernia repair demonstrates favorable short-term outcomes compared to laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair.机器人辅助食管裂孔疝修补术与腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术相比,具有较好的短期疗效。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jun;34(6):2495-2502. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07055-8. Epub 2019 Aug 5.