Suppr超能文献

自闭症谱系障碍的生物标志物探寻

In Search of Biomarkers for Autism Spectrum Disorder.

机构信息

Roche Innovation Center Basel, Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development NORD, Basel, Switzerland.

Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.

出版信息

Autism Res. 2018 Nov;11(11):1567-1579. doi: 10.1002/aur.2026. Epub 2018 Oct 15.

Abstract

Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) lacks validated measures of core social functions across development stages suitable for clinical trials. We assessed the concurrent validity between ASD clinical measures and putative biomarkers of core deficits, and their feasibility of implementation in human studies. Datasets from two adult ASD studies were combined (observational study [n = 19] and interventional study baseline data [n = 19]). Potential biomarkers included eye-tracking, olfaction, and auditory and visual emotion recognition assessed via the Affective Speech Recognition test (ASR) and Reading-the-Mind-in-the-Eyes Test (RMET). Current functioning was assessed with intelligence quotient (IQ), adaptive skill testing, and behavioral ratings. Autism severity was determined by the Autism Diagnostic Observation Scale-2 and Social Communication Interaction Test (SCIT). Exploratory measures showed varying significant associations across ASD severity, adaptive skills, and behavior. Eye tracking endpoints showed little relationship to adaptive ability but correlated with severity and behavior. ASR scores significantly correlated with most adaptive behavior domains, as well as severity. Olfaction predicted visual and auditory emotion recognition. SCIT scores related moderately to multiple severity domains, and was the only measure not related with IQ. RMET accuracy was less related to ASD features. Eye tracking, SCIT, and ASR showed high test-retest reliability. We documented associations of proximal biomarkers of social functioning with multiple ASD dimensions. With the exception of SCIT, most correlations were modest, limiting utility as proxy measures of social communication. Feasibility and reliability were high for eye-tracking, ASR, and SCIT. Overall, several novel experimental paradigms showed potential as social biomarkers or surrogate markers in ASD. Autism Research 2018, 11: 1567-1579. © 2018 The Authors. Autism Research published by International Society for Autism Research and Wiley Periodicals, Inc. LAY SUMMARY: More accurate measurements of treatment effects are needed to help the development of new drug treatments for autism spectrum disorders (ASD). This study evaluates the relationship between assessments designed to measure behaviors associated with social communication and cognition in ASD with clinical and diagnostic assessments of symptom severity as well as their implementation. The assessments including eye-tracking, auditory and visual social stimuli recognition, and olfaction identification showed potential for use in the evaluation of treatments for social difficulties in ASD.

摘要

自闭症谱系障碍 (ASD) 在各个发育阶段缺乏经过验证的核心社交功能测量方法,不适合临床试验。我们评估了 ASD 临床测量方法与核心缺陷假定生物标志物之间的相关性,以及它们在人类研究中的实施可行性。合并了两项成人 ASD 研究的数据(观察性研究 [n = 19] 和干预性研究基线数据 [n = 19])。潜在的生物标志物包括通过情感语音识别测试 (ASR) 和视眼心理测试 (RMET) 评估的眼动追踪、嗅觉以及听觉和视觉情绪识别。当前功能使用智商 (IQ)、适应能力测试和行为评估进行评估。自闭症严重程度通过自闭症诊断观察量表-2 和社交沟通互动测试 (SCIT) 确定。探索性测量结果显示,在自闭症严重程度、适应能力和行为方面存在不同的显著关联。眼动追踪终点与适应能力几乎没有关系,但与严重程度和行为有关。ASR 分数与大多数适应行为领域以及严重程度显著相关。嗅觉可预测视觉和听觉情绪识别。SCIT 分数与多个严重程度领域中度相关,是唯一与 IQ 无关的测量方法。RMET 准确性与 ASD 特征的相关性较低。眼动追踪、SCIT 和 ASR 显示出较高的测试-重测可靠性。我们记录了与社会功能的近端生物标志物与 ASD 多个维度的关联。除了 SCIT 之外,大多数相关性都很适中,限制了作为社交沟通的替代测量方法的应用。眼动追踪、ASR 和 SCIT 的可行性和可靠性均较高。总的来说,几种新的实验范式具有作为 ASD 社会生物标志物或替代标志物的潜力。Autism Research 2018, 11: 1567-1579. © 2018 作者。自闭症研究由国际自闭症研究协会和威利期刊出版公司出版。

非专业人士,译文仅供参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eaf0/6282609/d2048a2bea8c/AUR-11-1567-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验