Seca Susana, Patrício Miguel, Kirch Sebastian, Franconi Giovanna, Cabrita António S, Greten Henry J
1 Heidelberg School of Chinese Medicine, Heidelberg, Germany.
2 Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
J Altern Complement Med. 2019 Jan;25(1):86-97. doi: 10.1089/acm.2018.0297. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is characterized by pain, functional disability, poor quality of life (QoL), high socioeconomic impact, and annual costs of over $56 billion in the United States. Acupuncture (AC) is widely in use; however, studies show severe methodological shortcomings, did not consider the functional diagnosis for the allocation of acupoints and their results showed no differences between verum and control groups.
The authors aimed to objectively assess the safety and efficacy of AC treatments for RA.
105 RA patients with a functional diagnosis of a "Pivot syndrome" or "Turning Point syndrome" were randomly assigned to (1) verum-AC (verum acupoints), (2) control-AC (sham acupoints-points outside of the conduits/meridians and of the extra-conduits), or (3) waiting list (each group n = 35). AC groups experienced the exact same number, depth, and stimulation of needles. Assessments took place before and 5 min after AC with follow-ups over 4 weeks.
(1) Verum-AC significantly improved self-reported pain (Z = -5.099, p < 0.001) and pressure algometry (Z = -5.086, p < 0.001); hand grip strength (Z = -5.086, p < 0.001) and arm strength (Z = -5.086, p < 0.001); health status improved significantly (p < 0.001, Z = -4.895); QoL improved significantly in 7/8 survey domains; and number of swollen joints (Z = -2.862, p = 0.004) and tender joints (Z = -3.986, p < 0.001) significantly decreased. (2) Control-AC showed no significant changes, except in self-reported pain improvement. (3) Waiting list group showed an overall worsening.
This is the first double-blind controlled study on AC in RA of the hand that objectively and specifically assesses positive effects supporting its integration in rheumatology. Acupoint allocation according to Chinese Medicine functional diagnoses is extremely relevant to assess AC effectiveness in a patient group primarily defined by a "western" medicine diagnosis. Based on clear allocation criteria for acupoints, the authors minimized the possible bias of unspecific and suggestive effects on the control group, showed the specific effects of the points chosen, improved efficacy, and identified an evidence base for AC.
类风湿性关节炎(RA)的特征是疼痛、功能残疾、生活质量(QoL)差、社会经济影响大,在美国每年花费超过560亿美元。针灸(AC)被广泛使用;然而,研究显示其存在严重的方法学缺陷,未考虑根据功能诊断来分配穴位,且结果显示真穴组与对照组之间无差异。
作者旨在客观评估针灸治疗RA的安全性和有效性。
105例功能诊断为“枢纽综合征”或“转折点综合征”的RA患者被随机分为三组:(1)真穴针灸组(真穴位),(2)对照针灸组(假穴位——经络外和经外的穴位),或(3)等待列表组(每组n = 35)。针灸组接受的针刺数量、深度和刺激完全相同。在针灸前和针灸后5分钟进行评估,并随访4周。
(1)真穴针灸组自我报告的疼痛(Z = -5.099,p < 0.001)和压力痛觉测定法(Z = -5.086,p < 0.001)显著改善;握力(Z = -5.086,p < 0.001)和臂力(Z = -5.086,p < 0.001)显著改善;健康状况显著改善(p < 0.001,Z = -4.895);生活质量在8个调查领域中的7个显著改善;肿胀关节数量(Z = -2.862,p = 0.004)和压痛关节数量(Z = -3.986,p < 0.001)显著减少。(2)对照针灸组除自我报告的疼痛有所改善外,无显著变化。(3)等待列表组总体情况恶化。
这是第一项关于手部RA针灸治疗的双盲对照研究,客观、具体地评估了其积极效果,支持将其纳入风湿病学治疗。根据中医功能诊断分配穴位对于评估在主要由“西医”诊断定义的患者群体中针灸的有效性极为重要。基于明确的穴位分配标准,作者最大限度地减少了对照组中可能存在的非特异性和暗示性效应的偏差,显示了所选穴位的特定效果,提高了疗效,并为针灸确定了证据基础。