Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Laboratory for Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Nutrients. 2018 Oct 16;10(10):1520. doi: 10.3390/nu10101520.
In practice, it remains unclear what the best dietary approach is in subjects with pollen-related food allergy (PRFA). Our objective was to evaluate the effect of (1) dietary avoidance advice, (2) oral immunotherapy (OIT), (3) (heat) processing, and (4) consumption of hypoallergenic cultivars on frequency, severity, and eliciting dose of pollen-related food allergic reactions. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane. All studies performing an in vivo investigation of one of the four interventions in adults with PRFA were included. Each study was assessed for quality and validity. Available data on frequency, severity, and eliciting dose of allergic reactions were extracted. Ten studies matched the eligibility criteria. No studies were retrieved on dietary avoidance advice. Two studies ( = 92) on apple OIT reported that tolerance was induced in 63% and 81% of subjects. Four studies (total = 116) focused on heat processing. Heating was found to completely eradicate symptoms in 15⁻71% of hazelnut allergic and 46% of celery allergic individuals. Four studies ( = 60) comparing low to high allergenic apple cultivars revealed that Santana (and possibly Elise) apples seemed to cause milder reactions than Golden Delicious. In the awareness that overall level of evidence was low, we conclude that OIT, heat processing, and hypoallergenic cultivars may diminish or completely prevent allergic reactions in some but not all subjects with PRFA.
在实践中,对于花粉相关食物过敏(PRFA)患者,最佳饮食方法仍不清楚。我们的目的是评估以下四种方法的效果:(1)饮食回避建议,(2)口服免疫疗法(OIT),(3)(加热)处理,以及(4)食用低致敏品种,以评估其对花粉相关食物过敏反应的频率、严重程度和激发剂量的影响。我们在 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 中进行了系统检索。纳入了所有在 PRFA 成人中进行了四种干预措施之一的体内研究。对每个研究进行了质量和有效性评估。提取了有关过敏反应频率、严重程度和激发剂量的可用数据。符合纳入标准的研究有 10 项。没有检索到关于饮食回避建议的研究。两项关于苹果 OIT 的研究(共 92 名受试者)报告称,有 63%和 81%的受试者诱导产生了耐受。四项研究(共 116 名受试者)集中研究了加热处理。研究发现,加热可使榛子过敏者中 15%-71%和芹菜过敏者中 46%的症状完全消除。四项研究(共 60 名受试者)比较了低致敏和高致敏苹果品种,结果显示 Santana(可能还有 Elise)苹果似乎比 Golden Delicious 引起的反应更温和。鉴于总体证据水平较低,我们得出结论,OIT、加热处理和低致敏品种可能会减轻或完全预防某些但不是所有 PRFA 患者的过敏反应。