• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区参与早期干预中电子患者报告结局(e-PROs)的试点:经验教训。

Community engagement to pilot electronic patient-reported outcomes (e-PROs) in early intervention: Lessons learned.

作者信息

Rigau Briana L, Scully Elizabeth A, Dooling-Litfin Jodi K, Murphy Natalie J, McManus Beth M, Khetani Mary A

出版信息

J Clin Transl Sci. 2018 Feb;2(1):20-26. doi: 10.1017/cts.2018.15. Epub 2018 Jul 6.

DOI:10.1017/cts.2018.15
PMID:30333929
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6188646/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Electronic data capture is essential to advancing family-centered coordinated care in early intervention (EI). The purpose of this paper is to report on EI service coordinator response to piloting an electronic parent-reported outcome (e-PRO) assessment as part of their routine workflow, including lessons learned that may inform future phases of e-PRO implementation.

METHODS

This second pilot study involved families enrolled in a large EI program (n=1040 families) in concert with their implementation of a statewide quality improvement initiative for care plan development and outcomes reporting. A total of 22 EI service coordinators and supervisors were engaged in three phases: initial e-PRO intervention, peer mentor enhancement, and standard recruitment protocol.

RESULTS

Implementation of the e-PRO intervention and peer mentoring enhancement yielded low enrollment rates over the first six months (n=17). A standard recruitment protocol has resulted in enrollment growth (n=83) towards the targeted enrollment rate (n=832).

CONCLUSIONS

This study reports on early insights for building and sustaining a productive academic-community partnership for e-PRO implementation to support family-centered coordinated care. Lessons learned from this academic-community partnership with respect to strategies for enhancing community significance, collaboration, return, and control are discussed as they inform further development of this intervention prior to scale-up.

摘要

背景

电子数据采集对于推进早期干预(EI)中以家庭为中心的协调护理至关重要。本文旨在报告EI服务协调员对试点电子家长报告结局(e-PRO)评估作为其常规工作流程一部分的反应,包括可能为e-PRO实施的未来阶段提供信息的经验教训。

方法

这项第二项试点研究涉及参与一个大型EI项目的家庭(n = 1040个家庭),同时实施一项全州范围的护理计划制定和结局报告质量改进计划。共有22名EI服务协调员和主管参与了三个阶段:初始e-PRO干预、同伴导师强化和标准招募方案。

结果

在最初的六个月里,e-PRO干预和同伴指导强化的实施导致登记率较低(n = 17)。一项标准招募方案使登记人数朝着目标登记率(n = 832)增长(n = 83)。

结论

本研究报告了为实施e-PRO建立和维持富有成效的学术-社区伙伴关系以支持以家庭为中心的协调护理的早期见解。讨论了从这种学术-社区伙伴关系中学到的关于增强社区意义、协作、回报和控制的策略,因为它们为扩大规模之前该干预措施的进一步发展提供了信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/976d/6798974/b5ea9f2020bd/S2059866118000158_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/976d/6798974/46dffd50122b/S2059866118000158_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/976d/6798974/9f12a071740b/S2059866118000158_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/976d/6798974/64dbf6dad418/S2059866118000158_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/976d/6798974/b5ea9f2020bd/S2059866118000158_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/976d/6798974/46dffd50122b/S2059866118000158_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/976d/6798974/9f12a071740b/S2059866118000158_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/976d/6798974/64dbf6dad418/S2059866118000158_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/976d/6798974/b5ea9f2020bd/S2059866118000158_fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
Community engagement to pilot electronic patient-reported outcomes (e-PROs) in early intervention: Lessons learned.社区参与早期干预中电子患者报告结局(e-PROs)的试点:经验教训。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2018 Feb;2(1):20-26. doi: 10.1017/cts.2018.15. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
2
Pilot implementation of an electronic patient-reported outcome measure for planning and monitoring participation-focused care in early intervention.电子患者报告结局测量在早期干预中计划和监测以参与为中心的护理的初步实施。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Aug 24;20(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01189-9.
3
Rapid-Cycle Evaluation in an Early Intervention Program for Children With Developmental Disabilities in South India: Optimizing Service Providers' Quality of Work-Life, Family Program Engagement, and School Enrollment.印度南部发育障碍儿童早期干预项目中的快速循环评估:优化服务提供者的工作生活质量、家庭项目参与度和入学率。
Front Public Health. 2020 Nov 30;8:567907. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.567907. eCollection 2020.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Early intervention service intensity and young children's home participation.早期干预服务强度与幼儿的家庭参与度。
BMC Pediatr. 2020 Jul 3;20(1):330. doi: 10.1186/s12887-020-02182-x.
6
7
Lessons Learned: Implementation of Pilot Universal Postpartum Nurse Home Visiting Program, Massachusetts 2013-2016.经验教训:马萨诸塞州2013 - 2016年试点通用产后护士家访计划的实施情况
Matern Child Health J. 2018 Jan;22(1):11-16. doi: 10.1007/s10995-017-2385-x.
8
A Feasibility Trial of an Online-Only, Family-Centered Preventive Intervention for Hispanics: e-Familias Unidas.一项针对西班牙裔人群的纯在线家庭中心预防干预措施的可行性试验:电子团结家庭项目。
J Prim Prev. 2021 Apr;42(2):97-124. doi: 10.1007/s10935-020-00620-1. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
9
Integrating Patient-Reported Outcomes into Spine Surgical Care through Visual Dashboards: Lessons Learned from Human-Centered Design.通过可视化仪表板将患者报告的结果整合到脊柱外科护理中:以人为本设计的经验教训。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2015 Mar 13;3(2):1133. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1133. eCollection 2015.
10
Promoting early autism detection and intervention in underserved communities: study protocol for a pragmatic trial using a stepped-wedge design.促进服务不足社区的早期自闭症检测和干预:使用阶梯式楔形设计的实用试验研究方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Jun 7;19(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2150-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Caregiver strategies supporting community participation among children and youth with or at risk for disabilities: a mixed-methods study.支持残疾或有残疾风险的儿童和青少年参与社区活动的照顾者策略:一项混合方法研究。
Front Pediatr. 2024 Feb 15;12:1345755. doi: 10.3389/fped.2024.1345755. eCollection 2024.
2
Establishing and sustaining authentic organizational partnerships in childhood disability research: lessons learned.在儿童残疾研究中建立并维持真正的组织伙伴关系:经验教训
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Jul 20;9(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00466-x.
3
Implementing an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome and Decision Support Tool in Early Intervention.

本文引用的文献

1
Technology-based functional assessment in early childhood intervention: a pilot study.幼儿干预中基于技术的功能评估:一项试点研究。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018 Mar 21;4:65. doi: 10.1186/s40814-018-0260-1. eCollection 2018.
2
Caregiver Input to Optimize the Design of a Pediatric Care Planning Guide for Rehabilitation: Descriptive Study.照顾者对优化儿科康复护理计划指南设计的意见:描述性研究。
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017 Oct 24;4(2):e10. doi: 10.2196/rehab.7566.
3
Raising the profile of pilot and feasibility studies in relation to the development, evaluation and implementation of patient-reported outcome measures.
在早期干预中实施电子患者报告结局和决策支持工具。
Appl Clin Inform. 2023 Jan;14(1):91-107. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1760631. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
4
Effectiveness and scalability of an electronic patient-reported outcome measure and decision support tool for family-centred and participation-focused early intervention: PROSPECT hybrid type 1 trial protocol.电子患者报告结局测量和决策支持工具在以家庭为中心和以参与为重点的早期干预中的有效性和可扩展性:PROSPECT 混合 1 型试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 4;12(1):e051582. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051582.
5
Pilot implementation of an electronic patient-reported outcome measure for planning and monitoring participation-focused care in early intervention.电子患者报告结局测量在早期干预中计划和监测以参与为中心的护理的初步实施。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Aug 24;20(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01189-9.
6
Early intervention service intensity and young children's home participation.早期干预服务强度与幼儿的家庭参与度。
BMC Pediatr. 2020 Jul 3;20(1):330. doi: 10.1186/s12887-020-02182-x.
7
Electronic participation-focused care planning support for families: a pilot study.电子参与式以家庭为中心的照护计划支持:一项试点研究。
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2020 Aug;62(8):954-961. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.14535. Epub 2020 Apr 7.
提高与患者报告结局测量的开发、评估和实施相关的试点研究和可行性研究的关注度。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2017 Jun 17;4:3. doi: 10.1186/s40814-017-0151-x. eCollection 2018.
4
'Learn From Every Patient': implementation and early results of a learning health system.“向每位患者学习”:学习型健康系统的实施与早期成果
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2017 Feb;59(2):183-191. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.13227. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
5
Can eHealth Technology Enhance the Patient-Provider Relationship in Rehabilitation?电子健康技术能否加强康复治疗中的医患关系?
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Sep;97(9):1403-1406. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.04.002. Epub 2016 Apr 21.
6
Psychometric properties of the Young Children's Participation and Environment Measure.《婴幼儿参与及环境测量表》的心理测量学特性。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Feb;96(2):307-16. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.09.031. Epub 2014 Oct 18.
7
Ethical community-engaged research: a literature review.伦理社区参与式研究:文献综述。
Am J Public Health. 2013 Dec;103(12):e7-e14. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301605. Epub 2013 Oct 17.
8
Leadership, innovation climate, and attitudes toward evidence-based practice during a statewide implementation.全州实施过程中的领导力、创新氛围和对循证实践的态度。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2012 Apr;51(4):423-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2012.01.018.
9
Commentary: Improving participant recruitment in clinical and translational research.述评:提高临床和转化研究中的参与者招募效率。
Acad Med. 2011 Nov;86(11):1334-5. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182302831.
10
The challenges of collaboration for academic and community partners in a research partnership: points to consider.学术与社区合作伙伴在研究合作中的挑战:需考虑的要点。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2010 Mar;5(1):19-31. doi: 10.1525/jer.2010.5.1.19.