Department of Psychology, University of Scranton.
Department of Psychology, Brigham Young University.
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2018 Dec;55(4):303-315. doi: 10.1037/pst0000193.
This article introduces the journal issue devoted to the most recent iteration of evidence-based psychotherapy relationships and frames it within the work of the Third Interdivisional American Psychological Association Task Force on Evidence-Based Relationships and Responsiveness. The authors summarize the overarching purposes and processes of the Task Force and trace the devaluation of the therapy relationship in contemporary treatment guidelines and evidence-based practices. The article outlines the meta-analytic results of the subsequent 16 articles in the issue, each devoted to the link between a particular relationship element and treatment outcome. The expert consensus deemed 9 of the relationship elements as demonstrably effective, 7 as probably effective, and 1 as promising but with insufficient research to judge. What works-and what does not-in the therapy relationship is emphasized throughout. The limitations of the task force work are also addressed. The article closes with the Task Force's formal conclusions and 28 recommendations. The authors conclude that decades of research evidence and clinical experience converge: The psychotherapy relationship makes substantial and consistent contributions to outcome independent of the type of treatment. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).
本文介绍了一期专门介绍基于证据的心理治疗关系最新进展的期刊,并将其置于美国心理协会第三部门跨学科工作组关于基于证据的关系和反应性的工作框架内。作者总结了工作组的总体目的和过程,并追溯了当代治疗指南和基于证据的实践中对治疗关系的贬低。本文概述了该期刊中随后的 16 篇文章的荟萃分析结果,每篇文章都致力于特定关系要素与治疗结果之间的联系。专家组认为其中 9 个关系要素具有明显的效果,7 个要素可能有效,1 个要素有希望但研究不足。本文强调了治疗关系中哪些有效,哪些无效。还讨论了工作组工作的局限性。文章最后是工作组的正式结论和 28 条建议。作者得出结论,几十年来的研究证据和临床经验表明:心理治疗关系对治疗结果做出了实质性和一致的贡献,独立于治疗类型。(APA,保留所有权利)。