《联合国残疾人权利公约》时代的非自愿心理健康治疗。
Involuntary mental health treatment in the era of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
机构信息
Centre for Applied Legal Studies, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Harvard Law School Project on Disability, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
出版信息
PLoS Med. 2018 Oct 18;15(10):e1002679. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002679. eCollection 2018 Oct.
Abstract
Based on interviews with a variety of participants, Vikram Patel and colleagues advocate for philosophical and practical progress toward recognizing decision-making capacity in people with psychosocial disabilities.
摘要
基于对各种参与者的访谈，Vikram Patel 和同事们倡导在认知患有心理社会残疾的人的决策能力方面取得哲学和实践上的进步。
相似文献
1
Involuntary mental health treatment in the era of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.《联合国残疾人权利公约》时代的非自愿心理健康治疗。
PLoS Med. 2018 Oct 18;15(10):e1002679. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002679. eCollection 2018 Oct.
2
The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: a new approach to decision-making in mental health law.《联合国残疾人权利公约》：精神卫生法决策的新方法。
Eur J Health Law. 2012 Dec;19(5):423-40. doi: 10.1163/15718093-12341237.
3
A Fine Balance: Reconsidering Patient Autonomy in Light of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.微妙的平衡：根据《联合国残疾人权利公约》重新审视患者自主权
Bioethics. 2015 Jul;29(6):398-405. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12133. Epub 2014 Dec 10.
4
Mental Capacity, Human Rights, and the UN's Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.心理能力、人权与联合国《残疾人权利公约》
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2021 Jun;49(2):152-156. doi: 10.29158/JAAPL.210025-21.
5
Supported decision-making and personal autonomy for persons with intellectual disabilities: article 12 of the UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities.为智障人士提供支持性决策和个人自主：《联合国残疾人权利公约》第十二条
J Law Med Ethics. 2013 Winter;41(4):792-806, Table of Contents. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12090.
6
The right to liberty of persons with psychosocial disabilities at the United Nations: A tale of two interpretations.联合国中具有心理社会残疾人士的自由权利：两种解释的故事。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2019 Sep-Oct;66:101497. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.101497. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
7
Right to legal capacity in therapeutic jurisprudence: Insights from critical disability theory and the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities.治疗法学中的法律行为能力权：批判性残障理论和《残疾人权利公约》的启示。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2020 Jan-Feb;68:101535. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.101535. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
8
There Are All Kinds of Rights.权利种类繁多。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2016 Mar-Apr;46(2):insidebackcover. doi: 10.1002/hast.549.
9
The influence of the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities on the European court of human rights in the area of mental health law: Divergence and unexplored potential.《残疾人权利公约》对欧洲人权法院精神卫生法领域的影响：分歧与未开发的潜力。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2024 May-Jun;94:101965. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2024.101965. Epub 2024 Mar 3.
10
Human rights implications of introducing a new mental health act - principles, challenges and opportunities.引入新的《精神卫生法》的人权影响——原则、挑战和机遇。
Australas Psychiatry. 2020 Apr;28(2):167-170. doi: 10.1177/1039856220901483. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
引用本文的文献
1
Relative efficiency of psychiatric clinics in treating cases without coercion and achieving symptom reduction.精神科诊所在无强制手段治疗病例及实现症状减轻方面的相对效率。
Eur Psychiatry. 2025 May 27;68(1):e76. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.10034.
2
Decisional Capacity or Clinical Risks in the Provision of Emergency Treatment: Mixed Signals in the MHCA 2017.提供紧急治疗时的决策能力或临床风险：2017年《精神健康护理法》中的复杂信号
Indian J Psychol Med. 2024 Jan 31:02537176241226462. doi: 10.1177/02537176241226462.
3
Assessment of the feasibility of a community-based mental health training programme for persons with disabilities by non-specialists from different stakeholders' perspectives in Bangladesh.从孟加拉国不同利益相关者的角度，由非专业人员评估一项针对残疾人的社区心理健康培训计划的可行性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Mar 4;24(1):270. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10742-5.
4
Implementing a peer-to-peer, self-management intervention for young people with depression and anxiety in Denmark.在丹麦为患有抑郁和焦虑的年轻人实施基于同伴的自我管理干预。
BMC Psychol. 2022 Mar 16;10(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-00777-w.
5
Alternatives to coercion in mental health care: WPA Position Statement and Call to Action.精神卫生保健中替代强制手段的方法：世界心理卫生联合会立场声明及行动呼吁。
World Psychiatry. 2022 Feb;21(1):159-160. doi: 10.1002/wps.20950.
6
Establishing Good Practice for Human Rights-Based Approaches to Mental Health Care and Psychosocial Support in Kenya.确立肯尼亚基于人权的精神卫生保健和心理社会支持良好实践
Health Hum Rights. 2020 Dec;22(2):139-153.
7
A meta-review of literature reviews assessing the capacity of patients with severe mental disorders to make decisions about their healthcare.一篇文献综述的元分析评估了严重精神障碍患者在医疗保健方面做出决策的能力。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 30;20(1):339. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02756-0.
8
Peer Support in Mental Health: Literature Review.心理健康中的同伴支持：文献综述
JMIR Ment Health. 2020 Jun 9;7(6):e15572. doi: 10.2196/15572.
本文引用的文献
1
Adverse consequences of article 12 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities for persons with mental disabilities and an alternative way forward.《联合国残疾人权利公约》第十二条对精神残疾人的不良后果及可供选择的前进道路
J Med Ethics. 2018 Apr;44(4):226-233. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2017-104414. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
2
Reversing hard won victories in the name of human rights: a critique of the General Comment on Article 12 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.以人权之名逆转来之不易的胜利：对《联合国残疾人权利公约》第十二条一般性意见的批判
Lancet Psychiatry. 2015 Sep;2(9):844-50. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00218-7. Epub 2015 Jul 5.
3
A realistic approach to assessing mental health laws' compliance with the UNCRPD.一种评估精神卫生法是否符合《联合国残疾人权利公约》的现实方法。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2015 May-Jun;40:70-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2015.04.003. Epub 2015 May 13.
4
What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies.什么是足够的样本量？基于理论的访谈研究中数据饱和的操作化。
Psychol Health. 2010 Dec;25(10):1229-45. doi: 10.1080/08870440903194015.
5
How to justify enforcing a Ulysses contract when Ulysses is competent to refuse.当尤利西斯有能力拒绝时，如何为执行尤利西斯契约辩护。
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2008 Mar;18(1):87-106. doi: 10.1353/ken.0.0001.
Zotero 插件