• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较患有长期疾病或残疾与无长期疾病或残疾的青少年在屏幕时间行为方面的差异:2013/14 年 HBSC 研究结果。

Comparisons in Screen-Time Behaviours among Adolescents with and without Long-Term Illnesses or Disabilities: Results from 2013/14 HBSC Study.

机构信息

Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick V94 T9PX, Ireland.

Centre of Physical Activity and Health Research, University of Limerick, Limerick V94 T9PX, Ireland.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Oct 17;15(10):2276. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15102276.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph15102276
PMID:30336575
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6210288/
Abstract

Reducing sedentary behaviours can help prevent non-communicable diseases, particularly among young adolescents with long term illnesses or disabilities (LTID). Much of young people's voluntary sedentary time is related to screen-time behaviours (STBs) such as TV viewing, playing computer games, and using the computer for other activities. Although public health data on adolescents' STB is growing, information about adolescents with LTID is currently lacking in a European context. The purpose of this study is to compare time on STBs between adolescents with and without LTID in European Countries through the HBSC 2013/14 study. Young adolescents (n = 61,329; boys 47.8%) from 15 European countries reported the time spent on TV viewing, playing computer games, and using the computer for other purposes on weekdays and the weekend. STBs were dichotomised based on international recommendations of less than 2 h per day, and Chi-square tests of independence were performed to investigate differences. STB time was combined to produce a sum score as dependent variable in multiple analysis of covariance with age and family affluence as covariates. There were statistically significant differences in computer gaming among boys and other computer use among girls for both weekdays and weekends, whereby adolescents with LTID reported higher use. In addition, both boys and girls with LTID spent more time on STBs than their same sex peers without LTID (Boys, F = 28.17, < 0.001; Girls, F = 9.60, = 0.002). The results of this study indicate a need for preventive strategies to address high levels of STB among young adolescents with LTID and reduce the risk of poor health outcomes associated with higher levels of sedentary behaviour.

摘要

减少久坐行为有助于预防非传染性疾病,尤其是患有长期疾病或残疾的青少年(LTID)。青少年大部分自愿久坐的时间都与屏幕时间行为(STB)有关,例如看电视、玩电脑游戏和使用电脑进行其他活动。尽管关于青少年 STB 的公共卫生数据在不断增加,但在欧洲背景下,目前还缺乏有关 LTID 青少年的信息。本研究的目的是通过 HBSC 2013/14 研究比较欧洲国家 LTID 和非 LTID 青少年的 STB 时间。来自 15 个欧洲国家的青少年(n = 61,329;男生 47.8%)报告了他们在工作日和周末看电视、玩电脑游戏和使用电脑进行其他活动的时间。STB 根据国际建议分为每天少于 2 小时,采用独立性卡方检验来研究差异。将 STB 时间合并为一个总和得分,作为年龄和家庭富裕程度为协变量的多元协方差分析的因变量。男孩在工作日和周末的电脑游戏时间以及女孩的其他电脑使用时间均存在统计学差异,患有 LTID 的青少年报告的使用时间更高。此外,患有 LTID 的男孩和女孩在 STB 上花费的时间都比没有 LTID 的同性别青少年多(男孩,F = 28.17, < 0.001;女孩,F = 9.60, = 0.002)。本研究的结果表明,需要制定预防策略来解决 LTID 青少年中高水平的 STB 问题,并降低与高水平久坐行为相关的不良健康后果的风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2f7/6210288/eb3ec268dac3/ijerph-15-02276-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2f7/6210288/87b37c2bc02e/ijerph-15-02276-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2f7/6210288/eb3ec268dac3/ijerph-15-02276-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2f7/6210288/87b37c2bc02e/ijerph-15-02276-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2f7/6210288/eb3ec268dac3/ijerph-15-02276-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparisons in Screen-Time Behaviours among Adolescents with and without Long-Term Illnesses or Disabilities: Results from 2013/14 HBSC Study.比较患有长期疾病或残疾与无长期疾病或残疾的青少年在屏幕时间行为方面的差异:2013/14 年 HBSC 研究结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Oct 17;15(10):2276. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15102276.
2
Physical Activity Among Adolescents With Long-Term Illnesses or Disabilities in 15 European Countries.
Adapt Phys Activ Q. 2017 Oct 1;34(4):456-465. doi: 10.1123/apaq.2016-0138. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
3
Sedentary patterns and media availability in European adolescents: The HELENA study.欧洲青少年的久坐行为模式和媒体可及性:HELENA 研究。
Prev Med. 2010 Jul;51(1):50-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.03.013. Epub 2010 Mar 30.
4
International Trends in Adolescent Screen-Time Behaviors From 2002 to 2010.国际青少年屏幕时间行为趋势:2002 年至 2010 年。
J Adolesc Health. 2016 Apr;58(4):417-425. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.11.014. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
5
Time spent in sedentary activities in a pediatric population in Pretoria Central, South Africa.南非比勒陀利亚市中心儿科人群久坐活动所花费的时间。
Minerva Pediatr. 2016 Dec;68(6):435-440.
6
Patterns of sedentary behavior and compliance with public health recommendations in Spanish adolescents: the AFINOS study.西班牙青少年久坐行为模式和遵守公共卫生建议的情况:AFINOS 研究。
Cad Saude Publica. 2012 Dec;28(12):2237-44. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2012001400003.
7
Trends in television time, non-gaming PC use and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity among German adolescents 2002-2010.2002年至2010年德国青少年看电视时间、非游戏电脑使用时间及中度至剧烈身体活动的趋势
BMC Public Health. 2014 Apr 12;14:351. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-351.
8
Perceived family functioning and friendship quality: cross-sectional associations with physical activity and sedentary behaviours.感知到的家庭功能与友谊质量:与身体活动和久坐行为的横断面关联
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015 Feb 21;12:23. doi: 10.1186/s12966-015-0180-x.
9
School-based intervention on healthy behaviour among Ecuadorian adolescents: effect of a cluster-randomized controlled trial on screen-time.厄瓜多尔青少年健康行为的校本干预:一项整群随机对照试验对屏幕使用时间的影响
BMC Public Health. 2015 Sep 22;15:942. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2274-4.
10
Does the type of sedentary behaviors influence blood pressurein adolescents boys and girls? A cross-sectional study.久坐行为的类型会影响青少年男孩和女孩的血压吗?一项横断面研究。
Cien Saude Colet. 2018 Aug;23(8):2575-2585. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232018238.23612016.

引用本文的文献

1
Mental health in children with and without disabilities in a register-based Swedish sample supports the two-continua model: a latent class analysis.基于瑞典登记样本的残疾和非残疾儿童心理健康状况支持双连续体模型:一项潜在类别分析。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jun 19;25(1):2167. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23388-7.
2
Compliance with the 24-hour movement behaviour guidelines among children and adolescents with disabilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis.残疾儿童和青少年遵守 24 小时活动行为准则的情况:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 30;24(1):2357. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19842-7.
3
Physical activity of children and adolescents with disabilities in Poland - First Para Report Card.

本文引用的文献

1
The age of adolescence.青春期。
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2018 Mar;2(3):223-228. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(18)30022-1. Epub 2018 Jan 30.
2
Replacing Sedentary Time: Meta-analysis of Objective-Assessment Studies.取代久坐时间:客观评估研究的荟萃分析。
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Sep;55(3):395-402. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.04.042.
3
The multivariate physical activity signature associated with metabolic health in children.与儿童代谢健康相关的多变量身体活动特征。
波兰残疾儿童和青少年的体育活动——第一份段落成绩单。
J Exerc Sci Fit. 2024 Apr;22(2):111-116. doi: 10.1016/j.jesf.2023.12.007. Epub 2023 Dec 30.
4
Screen time among school-aged children of aged 6-14: a systematic review.6-14 岁学龄儿童的屏幕时间:系统综述。
Glob Health Res Policy. 2023 Apr 19;8(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s41256-023-00297-z.
5
Is the Health Behavior in School-Aged Survey Questionnaire Reliable and Valid in Assessing Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in Young Populations? A Systematic Review.《学龄期儿童健康行为调查问卷调查表评估青少年身体活动和久坐行为的可靠性和有效性如何?系统评价》
Front Public Health. 2022 Mar 28;10:729641. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.729641. eCollection 2022.
6
Czech adolescents' remote school and health experiences during the spring 2020 COVID-19 lockdown.2020年春季新冠疫情封锁期间捷克青少年的远程学习及健康体验
Prev Med Rep. 2021 May 1;22:101386. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101386. eCollection 2021 Jun.
7
Risk and Protective Factors for Frequent Electronic Device Use of Online Technologies.在线技术中频繁使用电子设备的风险和保护因素。
Child Dev. 2021 Mar;92(2):704-714. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13532. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
8
Outdoor physical activity, compliance with the physical activity, screen time, and sleep duration recommendations, and excess weight among adolescents.青少年的户外体育活动、对体育活动建议的遵守情况、屏幕使用时间、睡眠时间建议以及超重情况。
Obes Sci Pract. 2019 Dec 4;6(2):196-206. doi: 10.1002/osp4.389. eCollection 2020 Apr.
9
Twenty-Four-Hour Movement Guidelines and Body Weight in Youth.二十四小时身体活动指南与青少年体重
J Pediatr. 2020 Mar;218:204-209. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.11.031. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
10
Screen time among Spanish university students with disabilities: a self-organizing maps analysis.西班牙残疾大学生的屏幕时间:自组织映射分析。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jul 24;19(1):995. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7339-3.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Aug 15;15(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12966-018-0707-z.
4
Data on Determinants Are Needed to Curb the Sedentary Epidemic in Europe. Lessons Learnt from the DEDIPAC European Knowledge Hub.需要有关决定因素的数据来遏制欧洲的久坐不动流行。DEDIPAC 欧洲知识中心的经验教训。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jul 4;15(7):1406. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15071406.
5
Accelerometer-Assessed Physical Activity and Sedentary Time in Youth With Disabilities.残疾青少年中通过加速度计评估的身体活动和久坐时间
Adapt Phys Activ Q. 2018 Jan 1;35(1):1-19. doi: 10.1123/apaq.2015-0065. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
6
Physical Activity Among Adolescents With Long-Term Illnesses or Disabilities in 15 European Countries.
Adapt Phys Activ Q. 2017 Oct 1;34(4):456-465. doi: 10.1123/apaq.2016-0138. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
7
Sedentary Behavior Research Network (SBRN) - Terminology Consensus Project process and outcome.久坐行为研究网络(SBRN)——术语共识项目的过程与成果。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Jun 10;14(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0525-8.
8
The associations between sedentary behaviour and mental health among adolescents: a systematic review.青少年久坐行为与心理健康之间的关联:一项系统综述。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016 Oct 8;13(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12966-016-0432-4.
9
Physical Activity, Screen-Time Behavior, and Obesity Among 13-Year Olds in Ireland with and without Autism Spectrum Disorder.爱尔兰13岁自闭症谱系障碍患儿与非自闭症谱系障碍患儿的身体活动、屏幕时间行为与肥胖情况
J Autism Dev Disord. 2017 Jan;47(1):49-57. doi: 10.1007/s10803-016-2920-4.
10
Psychometric Validation of the Revised Family Affluence Scale: a Latent Variable Approach.修订版家庭富裕量表的心理测量学验证:一种潜在变量方法。
Child Indic Res. 2016;9:771-784. doi: 10.1007/s12187-015-9339-x. Epub 2015 Oct 18.