Cavalcanti Marcela S, Gönen Mithat, Klimstra David S
Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Int J Endocr Oncol. 2016 Aug;3(3):203-219. doi: 10.2217/ije-2016-0006. Epub 2016 Jul 14.
The understanding of neuroendocrine neoplasms has evolved significantly since their initial descriptions in the 1800s to early 1900s. In the gastroenteropancreatic system, this group of malignant tumors is subdivided into well and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine neoplasms based on morphologic, proliferative and biologic differences. However, it has become increasingly apparent that well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors are not a homogeneous group. Attempting to better predict outcome of these tumors has been the motivation behind numerous proposed classification systems, the evolution of which culminated with the currently used system, the ENETS/WHO classification. Herein, we review the genesis of this classification system and some of its shortcomings. In addition, we discuss some of the most recent proposals that suggest modifications to the current system.
自19世纪至20世纪初首次对神经内分泌肿瘤进行描述以来,人们对其的认识有了显著进展。在胃肠胰系统中,根据形态学、增殖和生物学差异,这组恶性肿瘤可细分为高分化和低分化神经内分泌肿瘤。然而,越来越明显的是,高分化神经内分泌肿瘤并非一个同质的群体。众多提出的分类系统背后的动机是试图更好地预测这些肿瘤的预后,其演变最终形成了目前使用的系统,即ENETS/WHO分类。在此,我们回顾了该分类系统的起源及其一些缺点。此外,我们还讨论了一些最近提出的对当前系统进行修改的建议。