• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于图形香烟包装警示语的对话:影响的理论机制。

Conversations about pictorial cigarette pack warnings: Theoretical mechanisms of influence.

机构信息

Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina, NC, USA; Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina, NC, USA.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2018 Dec;218:45-51. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.09.063. Epub 2018 Oct 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.09.063
PMID:30340152
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6535087/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Social interactions are a key mechanism through which health communication campaigns influence behavior. Little research has examined how conversations about pictorial warnings motivate behavior.

PURPOSE

We sought to establish whether and how smokers' conversations explain the effect of pictorial warnings on quit attempts.

METHODS

US adult smokers (n = 2149) participated in a controlled trial that randomly assigned them to have their cigarette packs labeled with pictorial or text-only warnings for four weeks. Surveys assessed the number of conversations sparked by pictorial warnings and the theoretical mechanisms cognitive elaboration and social norms at each visit. Analyses used structural equation modeling to test our theorized mediation models.

RESULTS

The number of conversations about the warnings mediated the relationship between exposure to pictorial warnings and quit attempts (p < .001). In serial mediation analysis examining possible theoretical mechanisms, the number of conversations was associated with greater cognitive elaboration, which in turn was associated with being more likely to make a quit attempt (p < .05). Social norms did not explain the influence of conversations on quit attempts.

CONCLUSIONS

Pictorial warnings increased conversations about the warnings, which led to greater cognitive elaboration, which led to greater quit attempts. Our findings suggest designing warnings that increase conversations in order to better inform and motivate smokers. Furthermore, these findings improve our understanding of why conversations matter in health communication.

摘要

背景

社会互动是健康传播活动影响行为的一个关键机制。很少有研究探讨关于图片警示的对话如何激发行为。

目的

我们试图确定吸烟者的对话是否以及如何解释图片警示对戒烟尝试的影响。

方法

我们招募了 2149 名美国成年吸烟者,参与一项对照试验,他们的香烟包装在四周内被随机贴上图片或纯文本警示标签。调查评估了图片警示引发的对话数量,以及认知加工和社会规范这两个理论机制在每次访问时的情况。分析采用结构方程模型来检验我们的中介模型理论。

结果

警示数量在图片警示与戒烟尝试之间的关系中起中介作用(p<.001)。在考察可能的理论机制的系列中介分析中,警示数量与更高的认知加工有关,而认知加工又与戒烟尝试的可能性增加有关(p<.05)。社会规范并不能解释对话对戒烟尝试的影响。

结论

图片警示增加了关于警示的对话,这导致了更高的认知加工,从而导致了更多的戒烟尝试。我们的研究结果表明,设计能够增加对话的警示,以便更好地为吸烟者提供信息和激励。此外,这些发现增进了我们对健康传播中对话为何重要的理解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a24b/6535087/aeab97212cdf/nihms-1019947-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a24b/6535087/005ce2ed4de5/nihms-1019947-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a24b/6535087/2f6db3d39ce3/nihms-1019947-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a24b/6535087/aeab97212cdf/nihms-1019947-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a24b/6535087/005ce2ed4de5/nihms-1019947-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a24b/6535087/2f6db3d39ce3/nihms-1019947-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a24b/6535087/aeab97212cdf/nihms-1019947-f0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Conversations about pictorial cigarette pack warnings: Theoretical mechanisms of influence.关于图形香烟包装警示语的对话:影响的理论机制。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Dec;218:45-51. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.09.063. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
2
Frequency and Content of Conversations About Pictorial Warnings on Cigarette Packs.关于香烟包装上的图形警示语的对话频率和内容。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2018 Jun 7;20(7):882-887. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntx180.
3
Understanding Why Pictorial Cigarette Pack Warnings Increase Quit Attempts.理解为什么图片警示包装能增加戒烟尝试。
Ann Behav Med. 2019 Mar 1;53(3):232-243. doi: 10.1093/abm/kay032.
4
Effect of Pictorial Cigarette Pack Warnings on Changes in Smoking Behavior: A Randomized Clinical Trial.香烟包装图案警示对吸烟行为变化的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Jul 1;176(7):905-12. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.2621.
5
Trajectories of Responses to Pictorial Cigarette Pack Warnings.对图片卷烟包装警示的反应轨迹。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2018 Jun 7;20(7):876-881. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntx182.
6
Framing Pictorial Cigarette Warning Labels to Motivate Young Smokers to Quit.设计图片式香烟警告标签以促使年轻吸烟者戒烟。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2015 Jul;17(7):769-75. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntu164. Epub 2014 Aug 20.
7
"That's probably what my mama's lungs look like": how adolescent children react to pictorial warnings on their parents' cigarette packs.“我妈妈的肺可能就是这样的”:青少年对父母香烟包装上的图片警示语的反应。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Sep 15;18(1):1125. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6011-7.
8
Social Interactions Sparked by Pictorial Warnings on Cigarette Packs.香烟包装上的图片警示引发的社会互动。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Oct 21;12(10):13195-208. doi: 10.3390/ijerph121013195.
9
Effects of Pictorial Warning Labels for Cigarettes and Quit-Efficacy on Emotional Responses, Smoking Satisfaction, and Cigarette Consumption.香烟图形警示标签和戒烟效果对情绪反应、吸烟满足感和香烟消费的影响。
Ann Behav Med. 2018 Jan 5;52(1):53-64. doi: 10.1007/s12160-017-9916-y.
10
Public support for pictorial warnings on cigarette packs: an experimental study of US smokers.公众对香烟包装上使用图片警示语的支持:一项针对美国吸烟者的实验研究。
J Behav Med. 2018 Jun;41(3):398-405. doi: 10.1007/s10865-018-9910-2. Epub 2018 Feb 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Indonesian Adolescents' Perceptions of Front-of-Package Labels on Packaged Food and Drinks.印度尼西亚青少年对包装食品和饮料包装正面标签的认知
Curr Dev Nutr. 2025 Mar 8;9(4):104586. doi: 10.1016/j.cdnut.2025.104586. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Tobacco package health warnings about product manipulations: an experimental study among Australian adults who smoke.关于产品加工的烟草包装健康警示:一项针对澳大利亚成年吸烟者的实验研究。
Health Promot Int. 2025 Mar 5;40(2). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daae210.
3
Do Perceived Message Effectiveness Ratings Change in Response to Repeated Message Exposures?

本文引用的文献

1
Why smokers avoid cigarette pack risk messages: Two randomized clinical trials in the United States.为什么吸烟者会回避香烟包装警示风险信息:美国的两项随机临床试验。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Sep;213:165-172. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.07.049. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
2
Testing competing explanations for graphic warning label effects among adult smokers and non-smoking youth.测试成年吸烟者和非吸烟青少年中图形警示标签效应的竞争解释。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Aug;211:294-303. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.06.035. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
3
Effects of Strengthening Cigarette Pack Warnings on Attention and Message Processing: A Systematic Review.
感知到的信息有效性评级会随着信息的重复曝光而改变吗?
Health Commun. 2025 Feb 28:1-9. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2025.2466115.
4
Understanding the mechanisms of change in social norms around tobacco use: A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions.理解烟草使用社会规范的变化机制:干预措施的系统评价与荟萃分析
Addiction. 2025 Feb;120(2):215-235. doi: 10.1111/add.16685. Epub 2024 Oct 12.
5
Designing and testing social media campaign messages to promote COVID-19 vaccine confidence among rural adults: A community-engaged approach featuring rural community leader and clinician testimonials.设计和测试社交媒体宣传信息以提高农村成年人对新冠疫苗的信心:一种以农村社区领袖和临床医生推荐为特色的社区参与方法。
Prev Med Rep. 2023 Nov 10;36:102508. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102508. eCollection 2023 Dec.
6
Do Vaping Prevention Messages Impact Adolescents and Young Adults? A Meta-Analysis of Experimental Studies.吸电子烟预防信息是否对青少年和年轻人有影响?实验研究的元分析。
Health Commun. 2023 Jul;38(8):1709-1722. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2023.2185578. Epub 2023 Mar 7.
7
Does warning language impact perceptions? Results from an exploratory experiment comparing English, Spanish, and Dual language E-Cigarette warnings among Spanish speakers in the US.警示语会影响认知吗?一项在美国讲西班牙语人群中比较英文、西班牙文及双语电子烟警示语的探索性实验结果。
Prev Med Rep. 2021 Dec 1;24:101656. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101656. eCollection 2021 Dec.
8
The impact of cigarette pack anti-littering messages.卷烟包装反乱扔信息的影响。
Addict Behav. 2022 Mar;126:107184. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.107184. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
9
Cognitive and emotional responses to pictorial warning labels and their association with quitting measures after continued exposure.对图片警示标签的认知和情感反应及其与持续接触后的戒烟措施的关联。
Addict Behav. 2022 Jan;124:107121. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.107121. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
10
Mediational Effects on Motivation to Quit Smoking After Exposure to a Cigarette Pictorial Warning Label Among Young Adults.年轻人接触香烟图形警示标签后对戒烟动机的中介效应。
Ann Behav Med. 2022 Jul 12;56(7):737-748. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaab073.
加强香烟包装警示对注意力和信息处理的影响:一项系统综述。
Journal Mass Commun Q. 2017 Jun 1;94(2):416-442. doi: 10.1177/1077699016674188. Epub 2016 Oct 28.
4
Understanding Why Pictorial Cigarette Pack Warnings Increase Quit Attempts.理解为什么图片警示包装能增加戒烟尝试。
Ann Behav Med. 2019 Mar 1;53(3):232-243. doi: 10.1093/abm/kay032.
5
Path analysis of warning label effects on negative emotions and quit attempts: A longitudinal study of smokers in Australia, Canada, Mexico, and the US.路径分析:警示标签对负面情绪和戒烟尝试的影响——对澳大利亚、加拿大、墨西哥和美国吸烟者的纵向研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Jan;197:226-234. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.10.003. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
6
Frequency and Content of Conversations About Pictorial Warnings on Cigarette Packs.关于香烟包装上的图形警示语的对话频率和内容。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2018 Jun 7;20(7):882-887. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntx180.
7
Graphic health warnings as activators of social networks: A field experiment among individuals of low socioeconomic position.作为社交网络激活因素的图形健康警示:对社会经济地位较低个体的一项实地实验
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Feb;175:219-227. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.12.044. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
8
Recruiting Diverse Smokers: Enrollment Yields and Cost.招募不同类型的吸烟者:入组率与成本
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Dec 16;13(12):1251. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13121251.
9
Advancing the evidentiary base for tobacco warning labels: A commentary.推进烟草警告标签的证据基础:一篇评论。
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Sep;164:130-132. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.07.029. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
10
The impact of strengthening cigarette pack warnings: Systematic review of longitudinal observational studies.强化香烟包装警示的影响:纵向观察性研究的系统评价
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Sep;164:118-129. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.06.011. Epub 2016 Jul 13.