Suppr超能文献

测试成年吸烟者和非吸烟青少年中图形警示标签效应的竞争解释。

Testing competing explanations for graphic warning label effects among adult smokers and non-smoking youth.

机构信息

Department of Communication, Cornell University, 450B Mann Library Building, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.

Department of Communication, Cornell University, 450B Mann Library Building, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2018 Aug;211:294-303. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.06.035. Epub 2018 Jun 25.

Abstract

RATIONALE

The United States courts have blocked the implementation of graphic warning labels on cigarette packages (GWLs). This decision was based, in part, on the premise that GWLs are unnecessarily emotional and are meant to scare rather than inform consumers about smoking's health effects. However, research in judgment and decision-making suggests these relationships are more complex.

OBJECTIVE

In this article, we draw on several theoretical frameworks that lead to competing hypotheses about the relationships between negative affect, health risk beliefs, and quit intentions (among adult smokers) or susceptibility to start smoking (among non-smoking youth).

METHOD

We tested these competing mediation models using data from two experiments with two populations each-adult smokers (Ns = 313 and 238) and primarily non-smoking middle-school youth (Ns = 340 and 237). Using mobile recruitment methods, we focused specifically on individuals from socioeconomically disadvantaged communities in rural and urban areas of the Northeastern United States.

RESULTS

The best fitting model across all four datasets was one in which label-induced negative affect (a) directly predicted intentions/susceptibility but also (b) indirectly predicted intentions/susceptibility via risk beliefs. Although mediation analyses did not demonstrate significant serial mediation effects of label exposure on intentions/susceptibility through negative affect then risk beliefs, there was some evidence that label exposure indirectly promoted adults' quit intentions through negative affect. Additionally, negative affect consistently mediated the indirect effect of label exposure on strengthened risk beliefs among adults and youth.

CONCLUSIONS

These results speak to the importance of negative affect in directly motivating adult smokers' quit intentions but also serving an informational function, directing adult smokers and non-smoking youth to accept the health risks of smoking.

摘要

理由

美国法院阻止了在香烟包装上使用图形警示标签(GWL)的实施。这一决定部分基于这样的前提,即 GWL 不必要地情绪化,旨在吓唬消费者,而不是让他们了解吸烟对健康的影响。然而,判断和决策研究表明,这些关系更为复杂。

目的

本文借鉴了几个理论框架,这些框架导致了关于负面情绪、健康风险信念与戒烟意愿(在成年吸烟者中)或开始吸烟的易感性(在非吸烟青少年中)之间关系的竞争假设。

方法

我们使用来自两个实验的数据来测试这些竞争的中介模型,每个实验都有两个群体——成年吸烟者(N=313 和 238)和主要是非吸烟的中学生(N=340 和 237)。我们使用移动招聘方法,特别关注来自美国东北部农村和城市地区社会经济处于不利地位社区的个人。

结果

在所有四个数据集上,最佳拟合模型是标签引起的负面情绪(a)直接预测意图/易感性,也(b)通过风险信念间接预测意图/易感性。尽管中介分析没有表明标签暴露对意图/易感性的影响通过负面情绪到风险信念的序列中介效应显著,但有一些证据表明,标签暴露通过负面情绪间接促进了成年人的戒烟意愿。此外,负面情绪始终在标签暴露对成年人和青少年增强风险信念的间接影响中起中介作用。

结论

这些结果表明,负面情绪在直接激发成年吸烟者戒烟意愿方面非常重要,但也具有信息功能,引导成年吸烟者和非吸烟青少年接受吸烟的健康风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f1a/6077088/d18832bdcf4b/nihms-980885-f0001.jpg

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验