Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Oncologist. 2019 Feb;24(2):211-218. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0408. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
Oncology clinicians often struggle with managing medications and vaccinations in older adults with cancer. We sought to demonstrate the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of integrating pharmacists into the care of older adults with cancer to enhance medication management and vaccination administration.
We randomly assigned patients aged ≥65 years with breast, gastrointestinal, or lung cancer receiving first-line chemotherapy to the pharmacy intervention or usual care. Patients assigned to the intervention met with a pharmacist once during their second or third chemotherapy infusion. We obtained information about patients' medications and vaccinations via patient report and from the electronic health record (EHR) at baseline and week 4. We determined the number of discrepant (difference between patient report and EHR) and potentially inappropriate (Beers Criteria assessed by nonintervention pharmacists blinded to group assignment) medications. We defined the intervention as feasible if >75% of patients enrolled in the study and received the pharmacist visit.
From January 17, 2017, to October 27, 2017, we enrolled and randomized 60 patients (80.1% of patients approached). Among those assigned to the intervention, 96.6% received the pharmacist visit. At week 4, intervention patients had higher rates of acquiring vaccinations for pneumonia (27.6% vs. 0.0%, = .002) and influenza (27.6% vs. 0.0%, = .002) compared with usual care. Intervention patients had fewer discrepant (5.82 vs. 8.07, = .094) and potentially inappropriate (3.46 vs. 4.80, = .069) medications at week 4, although differences were not significant.
Integrating pharmacists into the care of older adults with cancer is feasible with encouraging preliminary efficacy for enhancing medication management and improving vaccination rates.
Results of this study showed the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of an intervention integrating pharmacists into the care of older adults with cancer. Notably, patients assigned to the intervention had fewer discrepant medications and were more likely to acquire vaccinations for pneumonia and influenza. Importantly, this work represents the first randomized controlled trial involving the integration of pharmacists into the outpatient oncologic care of older adults with cancer. In the future, a larger randomized trial is needed to demonstrate the efficacy of this care model to enhance medication management and improve vaccination outcomes for older patients with cancer.
肿瘤临床医生在管理老年癌症患者的药物和疫苗方面常常感到困难。我们旨在展示将药剂师纳入老年癌症患者护理中的可行性和初步疗效,以加强药物管理和疫苗接种管理。
我们将年龄≥65 岁、接受一线化疗的乳腺癌、胃肠道癌或肺癌患者随机分为药剂师干预组或常规护理组。分配到干预组的患者在第二次或第三次化疗输注期间与药剂师会面一次。我们通过患者报告和电子健康记录(EHR)在基线和第 4 周获得患者用药和疫苗接种信息。我们通过非干预药剂师(对分组分配不知情)根据 Beers 标准评估确定差异(患者报告和 EHR 之间的差异)和潜在不适当的药物。如果研究中超过 75%的患者入组并接受了药剂师访问,我们将干预定义为可行。
从 2017 年 1 月 17 日至 2017 年 10 月 27 日,我们共招募并随机分配了 60 名患者(占已接触患者的 80.1%)。在被分配到干预组的患者中,96.6%接受了药剂师访问。在第 4 周,与常规护理相比,干预组患者接受肺炎(27.6%对 0.0%, =.002)和流感(27.6%对 0.0%, =.002)疫苗的比例更高。与常规护理相比,干预组患者在第 4 周的差异药物(5.82 对 8.07, =.094)和潜在不适当药物(3.46 对 4.80, =.069)更少,尽管差异不显著。
将药剂师纳入老年癌症患者的护理中是可行的,并且在加强药物管理和提高疫苗接种率方面具有令人鼓舞的初步疗效。
本研究结果表明,将药剂师纳入老年癌症患者护理中的方法具有可行性、可接受性和初步疗效。值得注意的是,分配到干预组的患者差异药物更少,更有可能接种肺炎和流感疫苗。重要的是,这项工作代表了第一项将药剂师纳入老年癌症患者门诊肿瘤护理的随机对照试验。未来,需要更大规模的随机试验来证明这种护理模式的疗效,以加强老年癌症患者的药物管理并改善疫苗接种结果。