Kurzawski Jacek, Janion-Sadowska Agnieszka, Gackowski Andrzej, Janion Marianna, Zandecki Łukasz, Chrapek Magdalena, Sadowski Marcin
Świętokrzyskie Cardiology Centre, ul. Grunwaldzka 45, 25-736, Kielce, Poland.
Department of Coronary Disease and Heart Failure, Jagiellonian University Medical College, John Paul II Hospital, Krakow, Poland.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Feb;35(2):319-325. doi: 10.1007/s10554-018-1466-2. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
To determine the left atrial longitudinal strain discrimination threshold of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). A total of 100 DCM patients and LVEF < 25% were included. Of them, 50 had sinus rhythm (SR), and 50 had AF. Patients with significant valvular disease, cardiac pacemakers and prosthetic valves were excluded. Speckle tracking echocardiography was performed to visualize the inferior and lateral walls of the left atrium as well as the interatrial septum. The Q-Analysis software was used to assess left atrial contractile strain (ε) during the atrial systole and left atrial conduit strain (ε) during the atrial filling. In SR patients analysis was P-wave timed. In AF patients the reference point was at 200 ms before the QRS complex on the surface ECG. The ε was significantly higher in SR patients than in those with AF (9.68% vs. 4.7%; p = 0.0003). ROC analysis demonstrated that ε less than 5.43% (AUC 0.95; 95% CI 0.905-0.995; p < 0.0001) together with ε below - 1.97% (AUC = 0.97; 95% CI 0.46-1.00; p < 0.0001) identified patients with AF. In patients with LVEF < 25% and AF left atrial contractile strain analysis is feasible. In these patients both contractile and conduit strain values are significantly lower than in patients with preserved SR, and ε below 5.43% and ε less than - 1.97% distinguish SR from AF patients with LVEF < 25%.
确定扩张型心肌病(DCM)患者心房颤动(AF)的左心房纵向应变判别阈值。共纳入100例左心室射血分数(LVEF)<25%的DCM患者。其中,50例为窦性心律(SR),50例为AF。排除有严重瓣膜病、心脏起搏器和人工瓣膜的患者。采用斑点追踪超声心动图观察左心房下壁、侧壁及房间隔。使用Q分析软件评估心房收缩期左心房收缩应变(ε)和心房充盈期左心房管道应变(ε)。SR患者分析采用P波定时。AF患者的参考点为体表心电图QRS波群前200 ms。SR患者的ε显著高于AF患者(9.68%对4.7%;p = 0.0003)。ROC分析表明,ε小于5.43%(曲线下面积[AUC]0.95;95%可信区间[CI]0.905 - 0.995;p < 0.0001)以及ε低于 - 1.97%(AUC = 0.97;95% CI 0.46 - 1.00;p < 0.0001)可识别AF患者。对于LVEF<25%且有AF的患者,左心房收缩应变分析是可行的。在这些患者中,收缩应变和管道应变值均显著低于窦性心律保留的患者,ε低于5.43%和ε小于 - 1.97%可区分LVEF<25%的SR患者和AF患者。