Suppr超能文献

如何评估健康方面的种族差异?流行病学研究中的分布、交互作用和解释。

How do we assess a racial disparity in health? Distribution, interaction, and interpretation in epidemiological studies.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; Social and Scientific Systems, Inc., Durham, NC.

Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.

出版信息

Ann Epidemiol. 2019 Jan;29:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.09.007. Epub 2018 Sep 29.

Abstract

Identifying the exposures or interventions that exacerbate or ameliorate racial health disparities is one of the fundamental goals of social epidemiology. Introducing an interaction term between race and an exposure into a statistical model is commonly used in the epidemiologic literature to assess racial health disparities and the potential viability of a targeted health intervention. However, researchers may attribute too much authority to the interaction term and inadvertently ignore other salient information regarding the health disparity. In this article, we highlight empirical examples from the literature demonstrating limitations of overreliance on interaction terms in health disparities research; we further suggest approaches for moving beyond interaction terms when assessing these disparities. We promote a comprehensive framework of three guiding questions for disparity investigation, suggesting examination of the group-specific differences in (1) outcome prevalence, (2) exposure prevalence, and (3) effect size. Our framework allows for better assessment of meaningful differences in population health and the resulting implications for interventions, demonstrating that interaction terms alone do not provide sufficient means for determining how disparities arise. The widespread adoption of this more comprehensive approach has the potential to dramatically enhance understanding of the patterning of health and disease and the drivers of health disparities.

摘要

确定加剧或改善种族健康差异的暴露或干预措施是社会流行病学的基本目标之一。在流行病学文献中,引入种族与暴露之间的交互项通常用于评估种族健康差异和针对性健康干预的潜在可行性。然而,研究人员可能会过分信任交互项,并无意中忽略了有关健康差异的其他重要信息。在本文中,我们从文献中强调了一些实证例子,这些例子表明在健康差异研究中过度依赖交互项存在局限性;我们进一步提出了在评估这些差异时超越交互项的方法。我们提出了一个用于差异研究的三个指导问题的综合框架,建议检查(1)结局发生率、(2)暴露发生率和(3)效应大小方面的群体特异性差异。我们的框架允许更好地评估人群健康方面的有意义差异以及对干预措施的影响,表明仅交互项并不能提供确定差异产生方式的充分手段。这种更全面方法的广泛采用有可能极大地增强对健康和疾病模式以及健康差异驱动因素的理解。

相似文献

2
Health-related disparities: influence of environmental factors.与健康相关的差异:环境因素的影响
Med Clin North Am. 2005 Jul;89(4):721-38. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2005.02.001.
7
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health and Health Care.健康与医疗保健中的种族和族裔差异。
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2017 Mar;44(1):1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2016.10.001.
8
Needed Interventions to Reduce Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Health.减少健康方面种族/民族差异所需的干预措施。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2016 Aug;41(4):627-51. doi: 10.1215/03616878-3620857. Epub 2016 Apr 28.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
United States Life Tables, 2013.《2013年美国生命表》
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2017 Apr;66(3):1-64.
2
Mediation Analysis for Health Disparities Research.健康差异研究的中介分析
Am J Epidemiol. 2016 Aug 15;184(4):315-24. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwv329. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
8
Mediation Analysis: A Practitioner's Guide.中介分析:实践者指南。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2016;37:17-32. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032315-021402. Epub 2015 Nov 30.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验