Mahmood Syeda Namrah, Bashir Umaiza
Syeda Namrah Mahmood, MS Clinical Psychology, Institute of Clinical Psychology University of Management and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan.
Umaiza Bashir, MS Clinical Psychology, Institute of Clinical Psychology University of Management and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan.
Pak J Med Sci. 2018 Sep-Oct;34(5):1164-1171. doi: 10.12669/pjms.345.15083.
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Post Stroke Cognitive Impairments (PSCI) occur frequently in stroke survivors resulting in devastating consequences affecting daily living of survivors. Currently, there exists scarcity of sound assessment tools for the evaluation of PSCI as most of the commonly used scales offer a number of clinical (requires motor and linguistic skills) and cultural limitations (requires academic exposure). Therefore, current study was aimed at evaluating the efficacy of Neuro-Cognitive Assessment Battery for Stroke patients (N-CABS) in Pakistan.
The participants were randomized in two groups including clinical and non-clinical group. N-CABS was administered on 61 clinical and 60 non-clinical participants (mean age=45 years; SD=5.55). Both groups were matched on all demographic variables including; age, gender, education and occupation. The psychometric properties of N-CABS were established through a number of robust measures of validity (construct, concurrent and discriminant validity) and reliability (internal consistency and test retest reliability).
The factor analysis suggested a two-factor solution (labeled as Verbal Cognitive Abilities and Visual Cognitive Abilities) for N-CABS explaining 67% of total variance. A significant test-retest reliability was found (α = 0.92, p<0.001). The findings of concurrent validity recommended a significant correlation between N-CABS and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) (α = 0.82, p<0.001). Similarly, discriminant validity also revealed significant group differences to exist on N-CABS (p<0.001) suggesting N-CABS be able to discriminate between patients and healthy controls.
The results of the current study favor N-CABS as a psychometrically strong screening instrument to screen PSCI in our culture.
中风后认知障碍(PSCI)在中风幸存者中频繁出现,会对幸存者的日常生活造成严重影响。目前,用于评估PSCI的可靠评估工具较为匮乏,因为大多数常用量表存在一些临床(需要运动和语言技能)和文化方面的局限性(需要有学术背景)。因此,本研究旨在评估中风患者神经认知评估量表(N-CABS)在巴基斯坦的有效性。
参与者被随机分为两组,即临床组和非临床组。对61名临床参与者和60名非临床参与者(平均年龄 = 45岁;标准差 = 5.55)进行了N-CABS测试。两组在所有人口统计学变量上进行了匹配,包括年龄、性别、教育程度和职业。通过一系列强有力的效度(结构效度、同时效度和区分效度)和信度(内部一致性和重测信度)测量方法,确定了N-CABS的心理测量特性。
因素分析表明,N-CABS存在一个双因素解决方案(标记为语言认知能力和视觉认知能力),解释了总方差的67%。发现了显著的重测信度(α = 0.92,p<0.001)。同时效度的结果表明,N-CABS与蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)之间存在显著相关性(α = 0.82,p<0.001)。同样,区分效度也显示在N-CABS上存在显著的组间差异(p<0.001),表明N-CABS能够区分患者和健康对照。
本研究结果支持将N-CABS作为一种心理测量学上强大的筛查工具,用于在我们的文化背景中筛查PSCI。