Department of Psychology, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
J Am Coll Health. 2020 Jan;68(1):21-25. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2018.1515763. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
College students have cited the 2016 U.S. presidential election as a significant source of stress. The current study examined the prevalence and demographic correlates of clinically significant election-related avoidance and intrusion symptoms among college students 2-3 months after the election. College students attending a large public university ( = 769; = 19.19; 48.2% female; 58.4% White) were surveyed in January and February 2017. Participants completed a validated measure of clinically significant event-related distress symptoms (eg, intrusive thoughts, avoidance) and demographic questions. One out of four students met criteria for clinically significant symptoms related to the election. Regression analyses suggested that sex, political party, religion, and perceived impact of the election on relationships were more useful predictors of stress symptoms than race or social class. The high level of event-related distress is concerning because elevated symptoms of event-related stress are predictive of future distress and subsequent PTSD diagnoses.
大学生将 2016 年美国总统大选视为一个重要的压力源。本研究调查了大选后 2-3 个月,大学生中与选举相关的回避和闯入症状的发生率和人口统计学相关性。2017 年 1 月和 2 月,在一所大型公立大学的学生(n=769;平均年龄=19.19;48.2%为女性;58.4%为白人)接受了调查。参与者完成了一项经验证的与临床显著事件相关的困扰症状(如,侵入性思维、回避)的测量和人口统计学问题。四分之一的学生符合与选举相关的临床显著症状的标准。回归分析表明,性别、政党、宗教以及对选举对人际关系影响的看法,比种族或社会阶层更能预测压力症状。与事件相关的高度困扰令人担忧,因为与事件相关的压力症状升高与未来的困扰和随后的 PTSD 诊断有关。