• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Friends, relatives, sanity, and health: The costs of politics.朋友、亲人、理智和健康:政治的代价。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 25;14(9):e0221870. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221870. eCollection 2019.
2
Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.迈向政治发展科学。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2019 Sep;84(3):7-185. doi: 10.1111/mono.12410.
3
Politics is making us sick: The negative impact of political engagement on public health during the Trump administration.政治让我们生病:特朗普政府时期政治参与对公众健康的负面影响。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 14;17(1):e0262022. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262022. eCollection 2022.
4
The New Right and family politics.新右派与家庭政治。
Econ Soc. 1992 May;21(2):93-128. doi: 10.1080/03085149200000006.
5
Anti-elite politics and emotional reactions to socio-economic problems: Experimental evidence on "pocketbook anger" from France, Germany, and the United States.反精英政治与对社会经济问题的情绪反应:来自法国、德国和美国的“钱包愤怒”实验证据
Br J Sociol. 2020 Sep;71(4):608-624. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12750. Epub 2020 Mar 27.
6
Reliance on Facebook for news and its influence on political engagement.依赖 Facebook 获取新闻及其对政治参与的影响。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 19;14(3):e0212263. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212263. eCollection 2019.
7
Links between family relationships and best friendships in the United States and Japan.美国和日本家庭关系与至交好友关系之间的联系。
Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2004;59(4):287-304. doi: 10.2190/XAV1-P8CN-LNL4-LYRE.
8
From adolescent connections to social capital: predictors of civic engagement in young adulthood.从青少年人际关系到社会资本:青年期公民参与的预测因素
J Adolesc Health. 2009 Feb;44(2):161-168. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.07.007. Epub 2008 Oct 29.
9
Effects of physical attractiveness on political beliefs.外貌吸引力对政治信仰的影响。
Politics Life Sci. 2017 Fall;36(2):3-16. doi: 10.1017/pls.2017.18.
10
Fear among the extremes: how political ideology predicts negative emotions and outgroup derogation.极端之间的恐惧:政治意识形态如何预测负面情绪和对外群体的诋毁。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2015 Apr;41(4):485-97. doi: 10.1177/0146167215569706. Epub 2015 Feb 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Anxiety, depression, headaches - is political polarization bad for your health?焦虑、抑郁、头痛——政治两极分化对你的健康有害吗?
Nat Med. 2024 Aug;30(8):2099-2102. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03136-x.
2
Examining the relationship between civic engagement and mental health in young adults: a systematic review of the literature.探究青年成年人公民参与度与心理健康之间的关系:文献系统综述
J Youth Stud. 2024;27(4):558-587. doi: 10.1080/13676261.2022.2156779. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
3
Impact of Residential Area Characteristics and Political Group Participation on Depression Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults: Results of an 11-Year Longitudinal Study.居住区域特征和政治团体参与对中老年人群抑郁症的影响:一项为期11年的纵向研究结果
Innov Aging. 2024 Jan 27;8(2):igae004. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igae004. eCollection 2024.
4
Training Psychology and Psychiatry Diversity Dialogue Facilitators.培训心理学和精神病学多样性对话促进者。
J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2024 Jun;31(2):292-303. doi: 10.1007/s10880-023-09978-w. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
5
United States politicians' tone became more negative with 2016 primary campaigns.2016 年总统初选开始后,美国政客的态度变得更加消极。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 28;13(1):10495. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-36839-1.
6
The harmful effects of partisan polarization on health.党派两极分化对健康的有害影响。
PNAS Nexus. 2022 Mar 9;1(1):pgac011. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac011. eCollection 2022 Mar.
7
The prevalence, incidence, and risk factors of mental health problems and mental health service use before and 9 months after the COVID-19 outbreak among the general Dutch population. A 3-wave prospective study.在 COVID-19 爆发前和爆发后 9 个月,普通荷兰人群中心理健康问题和精神卫生服务使用的流行率、发生率和危险因素。一项 3 波前瞻性研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 10;17(11):e0276834. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276834. eCollection 2022.
8
Civic engagement and psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间的公民参与和心理困扰。
BMC Public Health. 2022 May 2;22(1):869. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13289-4.
9
Resentment Is Like Drinking Poison? The Heterogeneous Health Effects of Affective Polarization.怨恨如同饮鸩?情感极化的非一致性健康效应。
J Health Soc Behav. 2022 Dec;63(4):508-524. doi: 10.1177/00221465221075311. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
10
Politics is making us sick: The negative impact of political engagement on public health during the Trump administration.政治让我们生病:特朗普政府时期政治参与对公众健康的负面影响。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 14;17(1):e0262022. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262022. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Event-related clinical distress in college students: Responses to the 2016 U.S. Presidential election.大学生与事件相关的临床困扰:对 2016 年美国总统大选的反应。
J Am Coll Health. 2020 Jan;68(1):21-25. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2018.1515763. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
2
Independent Relationship of Changes in Death Rates with Changes in US Presidential Voting.死亡率变化与美国总统选举投票变化的独立关系。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Mar;34(3):363-371. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4568-6. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
3
Health Effects of Dramatic Societal Events - Ramifications of the Recent Presidential Election.重大社会事件的健康影响——近期总统选举的后果
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 8;376(23):2295-2299. doi: 10.1056/NEJMms1702111.
4
Racism and Health I: Pathways and Scientific Evidence.种族主义与健康I:路径与科学证据
Am Behav Sci. 2013 Aug 1;57(8). doi: 10.1177/0002764213487340.
5
Socioeconomic inequality in voting participation and self-rated health.投票参与度和自评健康状况中的社会经济不平等。
Am J Public Health. 2001 Jan;91(1):99-104. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.1.99.
6
Alcohol dependence syndrome: measurement and validation.酒精依赖综合征:测量与验证
J Abnorm Psychol. 1982 Jun;91(3):199-209. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.91.3.199.

朋友、亲人、理智和健康:政治的代价。

Friends, relatives, sanity, and health: The costs of politics.

机构信息

Department of Political Science, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, United States of America.

Department of Political Science, University of California-Merced, Merced, CA, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Sep 25;14(9):e0221870. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221870. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0221870
PMID:31553726
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6760758/
Abstract

Political scientists have long known that political involvement exacts costs but they have typically defined these costs in relatively narrow, largely economic terms. Though anecdotal evidence suggests that the costs of politics may in fact extend beyond economics to frayed personal relationships, compromised emotional stability, and even physical problems, no systematic evidence on these broader costs exists. We construct and validate batteries of survey items that delineate the physical, social, and emotional costs of political engagement and administer these items to a demographically representative sample of U.S. adults. The results suggest that a large number of Americans believe their physical health has been harmed by their exposure to politics and even more report that politics has resulted in emotional costs and lost friendships.

摘要

政治学家早就知道政治参与需要付出代价,但他们通常将这些代价定义为相对狭隘的、主要是经济方面的代价。尽管轶事证据表明,政治的代价实际上可能超出经济范畴,延伸到人际关系紧张、情绪稳定受损,甚至身体健康问题,但这些更广泛代价的系统证据并不存在。我们构建并验证了一系列调查项目,这些项目详细描述了政治参与的身体、社会和情感代价,并向具有代表性的美国成年人样本进行了这些项目的调查。结果表明,大量美国人认为他们的身体健康因接触政治而受到损害,甚至更多的人报告说政治导致了情感代价和失去友谊。