Suppr超能文献

朋友、亲人、理智和健康:政治的代价。

Friends, relatives, sanity, and health: The costs of politics.

机构信息

Department of Political Science, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, United States of America.

Department of Political Science, University of California-Merced, Merced, CA, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Sep 25;14(9):e0221870. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221870. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

Political scientists have long known that political involvement exacts costs but they have typically defined these costs in relatively narrow, largely economic terms. Though anecdotal evidence suggests that the costs of politics may in fact extend beyond economics to frayed personal relationships, compromised emotional stability, and even physical problems, no systematic evidence on these broader costs exists. We construct and validate batteries of survey items that delineate the physical, social, and emotional costs of political engagement and administer these items to a demographically representative sample of U.S. adults. The results suggest that a large number of Americans believe their physical health has been harmed by their exposure to politics and even more report that politics has resulted in emotional costs and lost friendships.

摘要

政治学家早就知道政治参与需要付出代价,但他们通常将这些代价定义为相对狭隘的、主要是经济方面的代价。尽管轶事证据表明,政治的代价实际上可能超出经济范畴,延伸到人际关系紧张、情绪稳定受损,甚至身体健康问题,但这些更广泛代价的系统证据并不存在。我们构建并验证了一系列调查项目,这些项目详细描述了政治参与的身体、社会和情感代价,并向具有代表性的美国成年人样本进行了这些项目的调查。结果表明,大量美国人认为他们的身体健康因接触政治而受到损害,甚至更多的人报告说政治导致了情感代价和失去友谊。

相似文献

1
Friends, relatives, sanity, and health: The costs of politics.
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 25;14(9):e0221870. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221870. eCollection 2019.
2
Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2019 Sep;84(3):7-185. doi: 10.1111/mono.12410.
3
Politics is making us sick: The negative impact of political engagement on public health during the Trump administration.
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 14;17(1):e0262022. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262022. eCollection 2022.
4
The New Right and family politics.
Econ Soc. 1992 May;21(2):93-128. doi: 10.1080/03085149200000006.
6
Reliance on Facebook for news and its influence on political engagement.
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 19;14(3):e0212263. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212263. eCollection 2019.
7
Links between family relationships and best friendships in the United States and Japan.
Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2004;59(4):287-304. doi: 10.2190/XAV1-P8CN-LNL4-LYRE.
8
From adolescent connections to social capital: predictors of civic engagement in young adulthood.
J Adolesc Health. 2009 Feb;44(2):161-168. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.07.007. Epub 2008 Oct 29.
9
Effects of physical attractiveness on political beliefs.
Politics Life Sci. 2017 Fall;36(2):3-16. doi: 10.1017/pls.2017.18.
10
Fear among the extremes: how political ideology predicts negative emotions and outgroup derogation.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2015 Apr;41(4):485-97. doi: 10.1177/0146167215569706. Epub 2015 Feb 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Anxiety, depression, headaches - is political polarization bad for your health?
Nat Med. 2024 Aug;30(8):2099-2102. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03136-x.
2
Examining the relationship between civic engagement and mental health in young adults: a systematic review of the literature.
J Youth Stud. 2024;27(4):558-587. doi: 10.1080/13676261.2022.2156779. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
4
Training Psychology and Psychiatry Diversity Dialogue Facilitators.
J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2024 Jun;31(2):292-303. doi: 10.1007/s10880-023-09978-w. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
5
United States politicians' tone became more negative with 2016 primary campaigns.
Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 28;13(1):10495. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-36839-1.
6
The harmful effects of partisan polarization on health.
PNAS Nexus. 2022 Mar 9;1(1):pgac011. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac011. eCollection 2022 Mar.
8
Civic engagement and psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic.
BMC Public Health. 2022 May 2;22(1):869. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13289-4.
9
Resentment Is Like Drinking Poison? The Heterogeneous Health Effects of Affective Polarization.
J Health Soc Behav. 2022 Dec;63(4):508-524. doi: 10.1177/00221465221075311. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
10
Politics is making us sick: The negative impact of political engagement on public health during the Trump administration.
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 14;17(1):e0262022. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262022. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Event-related clinical distress in college students: Responses to the 2016 U.S. Presidential election.
J Am Coll Health. 2020 Jan;68(1):21-25. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2018.1515763. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
2
Independent Relationship of Changes in Death Rates with Changes in US Presidential Voting.
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Mar;34(3):363-371. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4568-6. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
3
Health Effects of Dramatic Societal Events - Ramifications of the Recent Presidential Election.
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 8;376(23):2295-2299. doi: 10.1056/NEJMms1702111.
4
Racism and Health I: Pathways and Scientific Evidence.
Am Behav Sci. 2013 Aug 1;57(8). doi: 10.1177/0002764213487340.
5
Socioeconomic inequality in voting participation and self-rated health.
Am J Public Health. 2001 Jan;91(1):99-104. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.1.99.
6
Alcohol dependence syndrome: measurement and validation.
J Abnorm Psychol. 1982 Jun;91(3):199-209. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.91.3.199.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验