Propel Centre for Population Health Impact, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave West, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada.
Movember Foundation, P.O. Box 60, East Melbourne, VIC, 8002, Australia.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Oct 22;16(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0374-1.
Knowledge syntheses that use a realist methodology are gaining popularity. Yet, there are few reports in the literature that describe how results are summarised, shared and used. This paper aims to inform knowledge translation (KT) for realist reviews by describing the process of developing a KT strategy for a review on pathways for scaling up complex public health interventions.
The participatory approach used for the realist review was also used to develop the KT strategy. The approach included three main steps, namely (1) an international meeting focused on interpreting preliminary findings from the realist review and seeking input on KT activities; (2) a targeted literature review on KT for realist reviews; and (3) consultations with primary knowledge users of the review.
The international meeting identified a general preference among knowledge users for findings from the review that are action oriented. A need was also identified for understanding how to tailor findings for specific knowledge user groups in relation to their needs. The literature review identified four papers that included brief descriptions of planned or actual KT activities for specific research studies; however, information was minimal on what KT activities or products work for whom, under what conditions and why. The consultations revealed that KT for realist reviews should consider the following: (1) activities closely aligned with the preferences of specific knowledge user groups; (2) key findings that are sensitive to factors within the knowledge user's context; and (3) actionable statements that can advance KT goals, activities or products. The KT strategy derived from the three activities includes a planning framework and tailored KT activities that address preferences of knowledge users for findings that are action oriented and context relevant.
This paper provides an example of a KT strategy for realist reviews that blends theoretical and practical insights. Evaluation of the strategy's implementation will provide useful insights on its effectiveness and potential for broader application.
使用现实主义方法的知识综合越来越受欢迎。然而,文献中很少有报告描述如何总结、分享和使用结果。本文旨在为现实主义综述的知识转化(KT)提供信息,描述为一项关于扩大复杂公共卫生干预措施途径的综述制定 KT 策略的过程。
用于现实主义综述的参与式方法也用于制定 KT 策略。该方法包括三个主要步骤,即(1)一次国际会议,重点是解释现实主义综述的初步结果,并征求对 KT 活动的意见;(2)一项关于现实主义综述的 KT 的针对性文献综述;(3)与综述的主要知识使用者进行磋商。
国际会议确定了知识使用者对综述中面向行动的结果的普遍偏好。还需要了解如何根据特定知识使用者群体的需求调整发现。文献综述确定了四篇论文,其中包括针对特定研究的计划或实际 KT 活动的简要描述;然而,关于哪些 KT 活动或产品对谁、在什么条件下以及为什么有效,信息很少。磋商表明,现实主义综述的 KT 应考虑以下几点:(1)与特定知识使用者群体的偏好紧密结合的活动;(2)对知识使用者背景内因素敏感的关键发现;(3)可以推进 KT 目标、活动或产品的可操作语句。该策略源自这三个活动,包括一个规划框架和针对知识使用者偏好的定制 KT 活动,这些活动侧重于面向行动和与背景相关的发现。
本文提供了一个融合理论和实践见解的现实主义综述 KT 策略示例。对该策略实施的评估将提供有关其有效性和更广泛应用潜力的有用见解。