UCD Centre for Interdisciplinary Research Education and Innovation in Health Systems (UCD IRIS Centre), University College Dublin, School of Nursing Midwifery and Health Systems , Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
School of Nursing Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Health Policy Plan. 2023 Oct 11;38(9):1079-1098. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czad078.
As community engagement (CE) is implemented for sustainable maternal and newborn health (MNH) programming, it is important to determine how these approaches work. Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) have become a particular focus for MNH CE activities due to their high burden of maternal and neonatal deaths. MNH messaging and communication to engage communities are likely to differ by context, but how these approaches are actually developed and implemented within CE is not well understood. Understanding how communications in CE actually work is vital in the translation of learnings across programmes and to inform future projects. The purpose of this realist review is to describe how, why, to what extent and for whom communications in CE contribute to MNH programming in LMICs. After searching academic databases, grey literature and literature suggested by the expert advisory committee, documents were included if they described the CE communication processes/activities used for MNH programming in an LMIC. Relevant documents were assessed for richness (depth of insight) and rigor (trustworthiness and coherence of data/theories). Data were extracted as context-mechanism-outcome configurations (CMOCs) and synthesized into demi-regularities to contribute to theory refinement. After screening 416 records, 45 CMOCs were extracted from 11 documents. This informed five programme theories explaining that communications in CE for an MNH programme work when: communities are actively involved throughout the programme, the messaging and programme are acceptable, communication sources are trusted, the community has a reciprocal relationship with the programme and the community sees value in the programme. While these findings reflect what is often anecdotally known in CE or acknowledged in communications theory, they have implications for policy, practice and research by highlighting the importance of centring the community's needs and priorities throughout the stages of developing and implementing communications for CE in MNH.
随着社区参与(CE)被用于可持续的母婴健康(MNH)规划,确定这些方法如何运作变得非常重要。由于孕产妇和新生儿死亡负担高,中低收入国家(LMIC)已成为 MNH CE 活动的特别关注焦点。针对社区的 MNH 信息传递和沟通可能因背景而异,但 CE 中这些方法的实际开发和实施方式尚未得到很好的理解。了解 CE 中的沟通如何实际发挥作用,对于跨项目学习的转化和为未来项目提供信息至关重要。本真实主义审查的目的是描述在 LMIC 中,CE 中的沟通如何、为何、在何种程度上以及对谁为 MNH 规划做出贡献。在搜索学术数据库、灰色文献和专家咨询委员会建议的文献后,如果文献描述了用于 LMIC 中 MNH 规划的 CE 沟通过程/活动,则将其纳入。对相关文献进行了丰富度(洞察力深度)和严谨性(数据/理论的可信度和一致性)评估。从数据中提取了情境-机制-结果配置(CMOC),并综合为半规则,以促进理论完善。在筛选了 416 条记录后,从 11 份文件中提取了 45 个 CMOC。这为五个项目理论提供了信息,这些理论解释了当以下情况发生时,CE 中的沟通对 MNH 项目有效:社区在整个项目中积极参与,信息传递和项目是可接受的,沟通来源是可信的,社区与项目之间存在互惠关系,社区认为该项目具有价值。虽然这些发现反映了 CE 中通常凭经验所知或沟通理论中所承认的内容,但它们对政策、实践和研究具有影响,因为它们强调了在开发和实施 CE 中的沟通时,始终将社区的需求和优先事项放在首位的重要性。