Rodriguez Marianeli, Lin James, Townsend Justin H, Smiddy William E, Albini Thomas A, Berrocal Audina M, Sridhar Jayanth, Flynn Harry W
Department of Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA,
Clin Ophthalmol. 2018 Oct 12;12:2053-2058. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S180353. eCollection 2018.
The purpose of this study was to report clinical features and outcomes in patients with giant retinal tears (GRTs) undergoing vitreoretinal surgery and to compare data from this contemporary series to a previous study from the same institution.
A retrospective, interventional, consecutive case series was conducted for all patients diagnosed with GRTs who underwent vitreoretinal surgery between January 2011 and August 2017. Intraoperative data including the use of scleral buckling, perfluorocarbon liquid, and intraocular tamponade were collected and compared according to GRT size. These parameters, along with postoperative anatomic success and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), were compared with the previous series.
The study included 80 eyes of 79 patients with a presentation of retinal detachment with a GRT. Management approach for repair of GRT-associated retinal detachments included scleral buckle (SB) alone (three eyes, 4%), pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) (16 eyes, 20%), and combined SB/PPV (61 eyes, 76%). Perfluorocarbon liquids were used in 60/77 eyes (78%) undergoing PPV, and silicone oil was used in 54/77 eyes (70%). Single surgery success rate was in 69/80 eyes (86%). Eyes managed with SB (including SB alone and SB/PPV) or PPV without SB had similar rates of recurrent retinal detachment (16% vs 6%; =0.33). Anatomic success was achieved in 76/80 eyes (95%) with one or more surgical procedures, and 54/80 eyes (68%) achieved postoperative BCVA of ≥20/400.
In the current series, repairs of retinal detachment due to GRTs were most commonly managed with combined PPV/SB and perfluorocarbon liquid, resulting in reasonably generally favorable anatomic and visual outcomes.
本研究旨在报告接受玻璃体视网膜手术的巨大视网膜裂孔(GRT)患者的临床特征和预后,并将该当代系列的数据与同一机构之前的一项研究进行比较。
对2011年1月至2017年8月期间所有诊断为GRT并接受玻璃体视网膜手术的患者进行回顾性、干预性、连续病例系列研究。收集术中数据,包括巩膜扣带术、全氟碳液体和眼内填充的使用情况,并根据GRT大小进行比较。将这些参数以及术后解剖学成功率和最佳矫正视力(BCVA)与之前的系列进行比较。
该研究纳入了79例患者的80只眼,均表现为伴有GRT的视网膜脱离。GRT相关视网膜脱离的修复管理方法包括单纯巩膜扣带术(3只眼,4%)、玻璃体切除术(PPV)(16只眼,20%)以及联合巩膜扣带术/PPV(61只眼,76%)。在接受PPV的77只眼中,60只眼(78%)使用了全氟碳液体,77只眼中54只眼(70%)使用了硅油。单次手术成功率为80只眼中的69只眼(86%)。采用巩膜扣带术(包括单纯巩膜扣带术和巩膜扣带术/PPV)或未采用巩膜扣带术的PPV治疗的眼,视网膜脱离复发率相似(16%对6%;P=0.33)。通过一次或多次手术,80只眼中76只眼(95%)实现了解剖学成功,80只眼中54只眼(68%)术后BCVA≥20/400。
在当前系列中,GRT导致的视网膜脱离修复最常采用联合PPV/巩膜扣带术和全氟碳液体,从而产生了总体上较为良好的解剖学和视觉预后。