• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

确定腹腔镜手术基础知识教学需求:日本的一项横断面研究。

Identifying the needs for teaching fundamental knowledge of laparoscopic surgery: a cross-sectional study in Japan.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.

Department of Surgery, Teine Keijinkai Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2019 Jul;33(7):2242-2248. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6511-7. Epub 2018 Oct 22.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-018-6511-7
PMID:30350098
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recently, laparoscopic surgery (LS) has become a more common procedure than traditional open surgery. Although LS-related adverse events have been reported, there is no formal, standardized curriculum to teach the fundamentals of LS in Japan. Understanding surgeons' knowledge regarding LS is crucial for developing an educational curriculum. The purpose of this study was to determine the baseline knowledge on LS of surgeons and surgical trainees in Japan.

METHODS

Participants completed 24 multiple-choice questions testing basic cognitive knowledge of LS and a questionnaire regarding the status of laparoscopic education. The examination was developed according to the 13 content domains of the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) program. Scores were compared between post-graduate year (PGY) > 5 and PGY 1-5 participants. Data are expressed as median scores and interquartile ranges. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 195 surgeons and surgical trainees from 10 teaching hospitals (PGY1-5: 66, PGY > 5: 129) across Japan completed the examination. The median score in the entire cohort was 75 [67; 83] %, with significantly higher scores in the PGY > 5 group compared to the PGY1-5 group (79 [75; 83] % vs. 67 [58; 75] %, p < 0.001). The differences in performance were due to better scores for PGY > 5 group on the sections "equipment," "patient considerations," "abdominal access," "tissue handling," "hemorrhage and hemostasis," "tissue approximation," and "exiting the abdomen." Overall, the median scores in the "energy sources" and "establishment and physiology of the pneumoperitoneum" subsections were lower than in other domains. All participants agreed on the need for fundamental knowledge and a formal educational curriculum.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to experienced surgeons, surgical trainees had lesser knowledge about performing LS. Regardless of the years of experience, there are crucial knowledge gaps in specific areas regarding safe LS that should be addressed by implementing an educational curriculum.

摘要

背景

最近,腹腔镜手术(LS)已成为比传统开放手术更为常见的手术。尽管已经报道了与 LS 相关的不良事件,但在日本,尚无正式的标准化课程来教授 LS 的基础知识。了解外科医生对 LS 的了解对于制定教育课程至关重要。本研究的目的是确定日本外科医生和外科住院医师对 LS 的基本知识。

方法

参与者完成了 24 个多项选择题,以测试他们对 LS 的基本认知知识,并回答了有关腹腔镜教育状况的问卷。该考试是根据腹腔镜手术基础(FLS)计划的 13 个内容领域制定的。将研究生后年(PGY)> 5 年和 PGY 1-5 年的参与者的分数进行比较。数据表示为中位数和四分位距。使用 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验进行统计分析。

结果

来自日本 10 所教学医院的 195 名外科医生和外科住院医师(PGY1-5:66,PGY> 5:129)完成了考试。整个队列的中位数得分为 75 [67;83]%,PGY> 5 组的得分明显高于 PGY1-5 组(79 [75;83]%比 67 [58;75]%,p <0.001)。表现上的差异是由于 PGY> 5 组在“设备”,“患者注意事项”,“腹部通道”,“组织处理”,“出血和止血”,“组织逼近”和“腹部退出”等部分的得分更高。总体而言,“能源来源”和“气腹的建立和生理学”两个部分的中位数得分低于其他领域。所有参与者都同意需要基础知识和正式的教育课程。

结论

与经验丰富的外科医生相比,外科住院医师对执行 LS 的了解较少。无论经验如何,在实施教育课程时,都应解决有关安全 LS 的特定领域的关键知识差距。

相似文献

1
Identifying the needs for teaching fundamental knowledge of laparoscopic surgery: a cross-sectional study in Japan.确定腹腔镜手术基础知识教学需求:日本的一项横断面研究。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Jul;33(7):2242-2248. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6511-7. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
2
Surgeons have knowledge gaps in the safe use of energy devices: a multicenter cross-sectional study.外科医生在安全使用能量设备方面存在知识差距:一项多中心横断面研究。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Feb;30(2):588-592. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4243-5. Epub 2015 May 28.
3
Boot cAMP: educational outcomes after 4 successive years of preparatory simulation-based training at onset of internship.Boot cAMP:在实习开始时进行连续 4 年基于模拟的预备培训后的教育成果。
J Surg Educ. 2012 Mar-Apr;69(2):242-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2011.08.007.
4
Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery: Not Only for Senior Residents.腹腔镜手术基础:不仅适用于高年级住院医师。
J Surg Educ. 2017 Nov-Dec;74(6):e51-e54. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.07.017. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
5
An intensive vascular surgical skills and simulation course for vascular trainees improves procedural knowledge and self-rated procedural competence.为血管外科实习生开设的强化血管外科技能与模拟课程可提高程序知识和自我评估的程序能力。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Mar;65(3):907-915.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.12.065.
6
Comprehension of fundamental knowledge about pediatric endoscopic surgery: a cross-sectional study in Japan.理解小儿内镜外科学基本知识:日本的一项横断面研究。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Aug;37(8):6408-6416. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-09975-y. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
7
Implementation and validation of a retroperitoneal dissection curriculum.腹膜后解剖课程的实施与验证。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Oct;219(4):395.e1-395.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.06.021. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
8
Retention of fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) proficiency with a biannual mandatory training session.通过每半年一次的强制性培训课程保持腹腔镜手术(FLS)熟练程度的基本要素。
Surg Endosc. 2015 Apr;29(4):810-4. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3759-4. Epub 2014 Aug 15.
9
The fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery in general surgery residency: fundamental for junior residents' self-efficacy.普通外科住院医师腹腔镜手术的基础:对初级住院医师自我效能感至关重要。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Nov;36(11):8509-8514. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09443-z. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
10
[Fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery in Colombia using telesimulation: an effective educational tool for distance learning].[哥伦比亚使用远程模拟的腹腔镜手术基础:一种有效的远程学习教育工具]
Biomedica. 2013 Jan-Mar;33(1):107-14. doi: 10.1590/S0120-41572013000100013.

本文引用的文献

1
Trends in the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery® (FLS) certification exam over the past 9 years.腹腔镜手术基础(FLS)认证考试近 9 年来的趋势。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Apr;32(4):2101-2105. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5907-0. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
2
Complications of Laparoscopy in Connection with Entry Techniques.腹腔镜检查与穿刺技术相关的并发症
J Gynecol Surg. 2017 Jun 1;33(3):81-91. doi: 10.1089/gyn.2016.0111.
3
Is laparoscopic appendectomy feasible for complicated appendicitis ?A systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗复杂性阑尾炎是否可行?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2017 Apr;40:187-197. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.03.022. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
4
Surgeons have knowledge gaps in the safe use of energy devices: a multicenter cross-sectional study.外科医生在安全使用能量设备方面存在知识差距:一项多中心横断面研究。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Feb;30(2):588-592. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4243-5. Epub 2015 May 28.
5
Efficacy of laparoscopic-assisted approach for reversal of Hartmann's procedure: results from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database.腹腔镜辅助法用于哈特曼手术逆转的疗效:来自美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)数据库的结果
Surg Endosc. 2015 Aug;29(8):2109-14. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3926-7. Epub 2014 Nov 1.
6
Hypercapnia and acidosis during open and thoracoscopic repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia and esophageal atresia: results of a pilot randomized controlled trial.先天性膈疝和食管闭锁开放和胸腔镜修复期间的高碳酸血症和酸中毒:一项初步随机对照试验的结果。
Ann Surg. 2013 Dec;258(6):895-900. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31828fab55.
7
Ensuring competency: are fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery training and certification necessary for practicing surgeons and operating room personnel?确保能力:腹腔镜手术培训和认证的基础对于执业外科医生和手术室人员是否必要?
Surg Endosc. 2013 Jan;27(1):118-26. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2437-7. Epub 2012 Jul 7.
8
Trends and results of the first 5 years of Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) certification testing.腹腔镜手术基础(FLS)认证考试前 5 年的趋势和结果。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Apr;25(4):1192-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1343-0. Epub 2010 Sep 25.
9
Malpractice carrier underwrites Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery training and testing: a benchmark for patient safety. malpractice carrier 承保方 Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery training and testing: a benchmark for patient safety. 腹腔镜手术培训和测试的基本原则:患者安全的基准。
Surg Endosc. 2010 Mar;24(3):616-23. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0617-x. Epub 2009 Aug 18.
10
Beta test results of a new system assessing competence in laparoscopic surgery.一种评估腹腔镜手术能力的新系统的β测试结果。
J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Jan;202(1):62-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.09.024.