• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

malpractice carrier 承保方 Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery training and testing: a benchmark for patient safety. 腹腔镜手术培训和测试的基本原则:患者安全的基准。

Malpractice carrier underwrites Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery training and testing: a benchmark for patient safety.

机构信息

Section of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2010 Mar;24(3):616-23. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0617-x. Epub 2009 Aug 18.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-009-0617-x
PMID:19688400
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) is a validated program developed by the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) to educate and assess competency in minimally invasive surgery (MIS). This study reports the first malpractice carrier-sponsored FLS course for surgeons in practice underwritten by the Controlled Risk Insurance Company of Harvard's Risk Management Foundation (CRICO/RMF). The study investigated the participating surgeons' pattern of MIS skills acquisition, subjective laparoscopic comfort level, operative activity, and perception of the FLS role in surgical education, credentialing, and patient safety.

METHODS

A 1-day postgraduate continuous medical education (CME) course consisted of didactic presentations of the leading MIS faculty, proctored FLS hands-on training, psychomotor testing, and cognitive computer-based examination. Voluntary anonymous pre- and postcourse surveys were distributed to the participants at registration and at completion of both the didactic teaching and the skills modules of the program.

RESULTS

The course was attended by 37 practicing surgeons in the Harvard system, and 86% of the survey forms were returned. The major driving forces for attending the course were directive from the chief/chairman (50%), improvement in MIS didactic knowledge (56%), and the belief that FLS would become a standard such as advanced trauma life support (ATLS), advanced cardiac life support (ACLS), or the like (53%). Surgeons reported that the FLS exam content was appropriate (Likert 4.41 +/- 0.91) and that mastery of the course material would improve safety (Likert 4.13 +/- 0.79) and technical knowledge of MIS (Likert 4.03 +/- 1.00).

CONCLUSIONS

This unique cooperative effort between a liability carrier, a professional surgical society, and proactive surgeons should be considered a model for advancing competency and patient safety. The survey results indicate a positive view of FLS in surgical training, safety, and MIS education.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜手术基础(FLS)是由美国胃肠内镜外科医师学会(SAGES)开发的一项经过验证的项目,旨在教育和评估微创外科(MIS)的能力。本研究报告了首个由哈佛风险管理基金会的受控风险保险公司(CRICO/RMF)承保的、面向执业外科医生的、由责任方赞助的 FLS 课程。该研究调查了参与外科医生的 MIS 技能获取模式、主观腹腔镜舒适度水平、手术活动以及对 FLS 在外科教育、认证和患者安全中的作用的看法。

方法

为期 1 天的研究生继续医学教育(CME)课程包括由 MIS 主要教员进行的讲座、监督 FLS 实践培训、心理运动测试和基于计算机的认知考试。在注册时和课程的理论教学和技能模块完成时,向参与者分发了自愿匿名的课前和课后调查。

结果

哈佛系统的 37 名执业外科医生参加了该课程,86%的调查问卷得以返回。参加该课程的主要驱动力是主任/主席的指示(50%)、提高 MIS 理论知识(56%),以及相信 FLS 将成为像高级创伤生命支持(ATLS)、高级心脏生命支持(ACLS)等标准(53%)。外科医生报告说 FLS 考试内容合适(Likert 4.41 +/- 0.91),并且掌握课程材料将提高安全性(Likert 4.13 +/- 0.79)和 MIS 的技术知识(Likert 4.03 +/- 1.00)。

结论

责任方、专业外科医师学会和积极主动的外科医生之间的这种独特合作努力应被视为提高能力和患者安全的典范。调查结果表明,外科医生对 FLS 在外科培训、安全和 MIS 教育中的应用持积极看法。

相似文献

1
Malpractice carrier underwrites Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery training and testing: a benchmark for patient safety. malpractice carrier 承保方 Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery training and testing: a benchmark for patient safety. 腹腔镜手术培训和测试的基本原则:患者安全的基准。
Surg Endosc. 2010 Mar;24(3):616-23. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0617-x. Epub 2009 Aug 18.
2
Validity of using Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) program to assess laparoscopic competence for gynecologists.使用腹腔镜手术基础(FLS)项目评估妇科医生腹腔镜能力的有效性。
Surg Endosc. 2010 Jan;24(1):152-60. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0539-7. Epub 2009 Jun 11.
3
Ensuring competency: are fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery training and certification necessary for practicing surgeons and operating room personnel?确保能力:腹腔镜手术培训和认证的基础对于执业外科医生和手术室人员是否必要?
Surg Endosc. 2013 Jan;27(1):118-26. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2437-7. Epub 2012 Jul 7.
4
Surgical simulation in Africa: the feasibility and impact of a 3-day fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery course.非洲的外科手术模拟:3 天腹腔镜手术基础课程的可行性和影响。
Surg Endosc. 2009 Nov;23(11):2493-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0424-4. Epub 2009 Apr 3.
5
Retention of fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) proficiency with a biannual mandatory training session.通过每半年一次的强制性培训课程保持腹腔镜手术(FLS)熟练程度的基本要素。
Surg Endosc. 2015 Apr;29(4):810-4. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3759-4. Epub 2014 Aug 15.
6
Model for Team Training Using the Advanced Trauma Operative Management Course: Pilot Study Analysis.使用高级创伤手术管理课程进行团队培训的模型:试点研究分析
J Surg Educ. 2015 Nov-Dec;72(6):1200-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.06.023. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
7
What are essential laparoscopic skills these days? Results of the SAGES Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) Committee technical skills survey.如今,哪些是基本的腹腔镜技能?外科医师学会腹腔镜手术基础(FLS)委员会技术技能调查结果。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Oct;37(10):7676-7685. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10238-z. Epub 2023 Jul 30.
8
Trends and results of the first 5 years of Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) certification testing.腹腔镜手术基础(FLS)认证考试前 5 年的趋势和结果。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Apr;25(4):1192-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1343-0. Epub 2010 Sep 25.
9
Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery: Not Only for Senior Residents.腹腔镜手术基础:不仅适用于高年级住院医师。
J Surg Educ. 2017 Nov-Dec;74(6):e51-e54. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.07.017. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
10
Certification pass rate of 100% for fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery skills after proficiency-based training.基于熟练度的培训后,腹腔镜手术技能基础认证通过率达100%。
Surg Endosc. 2008 Aug;22(8):1887-93. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9745-y. Epub 2008 Feb 13.

引用本文的文献

1
What are essential laparoscopic skills these days? Results of the SAGES Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) Committee technical skills survey.如今,哪些是基本的腹腔镜技能?外科医师学会腹腔镜手术基础(FLS)委员会技术技能调查结果。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Oct;37(10):7676-7685. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10238-z. Epub 2023 Jul 30.
2
Comprehension of fundamental knowledge about pediatric endoscopic surgery: a cross-sectional study in Japan.理解小儿内镜外科学基本知识:日本的一项横断面研究。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Aug;37(8):6408-6416. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-09975-y. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
3
A Novel Theory-Based Virtual Reality Training to Improve Patient Safety Culture in the Department of Surgery of a Large Academic Medical Center: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Surgical skills training and simulation.外科手术技能培训与模拟
Curr Probl Surg. 2009 Apr;46(4):271-370. doi: 10.1067/j.cpsurg.2008.12.003.
2
Proficiency-based laparoscopic simulator training leads to improved operating room skill that is resistant to decay.基于熟练度的腹腔镜模拟器训练可提高手术室技能,且该技能不易衰退。
Surg Innov. 2008 Mar;15(1):69-73. doi: 10.1177/1553350608316683. Epub 2008 Apr 2.
3
Certification pass rate of 100% for fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery skills after proficiency-based training.基于熟练度的培训后,腹腔镜手术技能基础认证通过率达100%。
一种基于新理论的虚拟现实培训,用于改善大型学术医疗中心外科的患者安全文化:一项混合方法研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Aug 24;11(8):e40445. doi: 10.2196/40445.
4
Performance gaps and improvement plans from a 5-hospital simulation programme for anaesthesiology providers: a retrospective study.针对麻醉医护人员的五家医院模拟项目中的绩效差距与改进计划:一项回顾性研究
BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2017 Apr 5;3(2):37-42. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2016-000163. eCollection 2017.
5
Development of a novel educational tool to assess skills in laparoscopic liver surgery using the Delphi methodology: the laparoscopic liver skills scale (LLSS).运用德尔菲法开发一种用于评估腹腔镜肝脏手术技能的新型教育工具:腹腔镜肝脏技能量表(LLSS)。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Apr;36(4):2321-2333. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08507-w. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
6
Development of a novel tool to assess skills in laparoscopic gastrectomy using the Delphi method: the Japanese operative rating scale for laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (JORS-LDG).采用 Delphi 法开发一种评估腹腔镜胃切除术技能的新工具:日本腹腔镜远端胃切除术手术评分量表(JORS-LDG)。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Dec;33(12):3945-3952. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06681-6. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
7
Identifying the needs for teaching fundamental knowledge of laparoscopic surgery: a cross-sectional study in Japan.确定腹腔镜手术基础知识教学需求:日本的一项横断面研究。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Jul;33(7):2242-2248. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6511-7. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
8
Canadian general surgery residents' need formal curricula and objective performance assessments in gastrointestinal endoscopy training: a program director census.加拿大普通外科住院医师在胃肠内镜培训中需要正规课程和客观的绩效评估:项目主任普查。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Dec;32(12):5012-5020. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6364-0. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
9
It's better to be lucky.运气好总比什么都强。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jul;32(7):3001-3008. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6243-8. Epub 2018 May 15.
10
[Evaluation of residency training in general and digestive surgery in Tunisia].[突尼斯普通外科和消化外科住院医师培训评估]
Pan Afr Med J. 2015 Aug 31;21:328. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2015.21.328.6604. eCollection 2015.
Surg Endosc. 2008 Aug;22(8):1887-93. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9745-y. Epub 2008 Feb 13.
4
Simulated laparoscopic operating room crisis: An approach to enhance the surgical team performance.模拟腹腔镜手术室危机:提高手术团队表现的一种方法。
Surg Endosc. 2008 Apr;22(4):885-900. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9678-x. Epub 2007 Dec 11.
5
Integrating simulation in surgery as a teaching tool and credentialing standard.将模拟技术融入外科手术,作为一种教学工具和资质认证标准。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2008 Feb;12(2):222-33. doi: 10.1007/s11605-007-0250-8. Epub 2007 Nov 15.
6
Patterns of technical error among surgical malpractice claims: an analysis of strategies to prevent injury to surgical patients.外科医疗事故索赔中的技术失误模式:预防手术患者受伤的策略分析
Ann Surg. 2007 Nov;246(5):705-11. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31815865f8.
7
FLS assessment of competency using simulated laparoscopic tasks.使用模拟腹腔镜任务对能力进行FLS评估。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2008 Feb;12(2):210-2. doi: 10.1007/s11605-007-0355-0. Epub 2007 Oct 23.
8
Medical errors involving trainees: a study of closed malpractice claims from 5 insurers.涉及实习医生的医疗差错:对5家保险公司已结案的医疗事故索赔进行的研究
Arch Intern Med. 2007 Oct 22;167(19):2030-6. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.19.2030.
9
Innovative teaching for health law: a case study of a hospital medical malpractice lawsuit simulation.卫生法创新教学:以医院医疗事故诉讼模拟为例
J Health Adm Educ. 2007 Winter;24(1):43-57.
10
Experienced surgeons can do more than one thing at a time: effect of distraction on performance of a simple laparoscopic and cognitive task by experienced and novice surgeons.经验丰富的外科医生可以同时做不止一件事:分心对经验丰富和新手外科医生执行简单腹腔镜和认知任务的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2008 Jan;22(1):196-201. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9452-0.