• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Use of the Xi robotic platform for total abdominal colectomy: a step forward in minimally invasive colorectal surgery.使用 Xi 机器人平台进行全腹部结肠切除术:微创结直肠手术的一大进步。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Mar;33(3):966-971. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6529-x. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
2
The da Vinci Xi system for robotic total/subtotal colectomy vs. conventional laparoscopy: short-term outcomes.达芬奇 Xi 系统机器人全结肠/次全结肠切除术与传统腹腔镜术:短期结果。
Tech Coloproctol. 2019 Sep;23(9):861-868. doi: 10.1007/s10151-019-02066-y. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
3
Multiquadrant robotic colorectal surgery: the da Vinci Xi vs Si comparison.多象限机器人结直肠手术:达芬奇Xi系统与Si系统对比
J Robot Surg. 2018 Mar;12(1):67-74. doi: 10.1007/s11701-017-0689-x. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
4
Clinical outcomes and cost-benefit analysis comparing laparoscopic and robotic colorectal surgeries.比较腹腔镜和机器人辅助结直肠手术的临床结果及成本效益分析
Surg Endosc. 2016 Dec;30(12):5490-5493. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4910-1. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
5
In experienced hands, does the robotic platform impact operative efficiency? Comparison of the da Vinci Si versus Xi robot in colorectal surgery.在经验丰富的医生手中,机器人平台会影响手术效率吗?达芬奇Si机器人与Xi机器人在结直肠癌手术中的比较。
J Robot Surg. 2020 Oct;14(5):789-792. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01055-w. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
6
Does transition from the da Vinci Si to Xi robotic platform impact single-docking technique for robot-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy?从达芬奇Si机器人平台过渡到Xi机器人平台是否会影响机器人辅助腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术的单对接技术?
BJU Int. 2015 Dec;116(6):990-4. doi: 10.1111/bju.13210. Epub 2015 Jul 18.
7
Comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches for total abdominal colectomy.开腹、腹腔镜及机器人辅助全腹结肠切除术的比较
Surg Endosc. 2016 Jul;30(7):2792-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4552-8. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
8
A comparative analysis of outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and robotic elective (procto-) colectomies for benign and malignant disease.开腹、腹腔镜和机器人择期(直肠-)结肠切除术治疗良恶性疾病的结局比较分析。
J Robot Surg. 2021 Feb;15(1):53-62. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01069-4. Epub 2020 Mar 21.
9
Safe adoption of robotic colorectal surgery using structured training: early Irish experience.安全采用机器人结直肠手术进行结构化培训:爱尔兰早期经验。
J Robot Surg. 2019 Oct;13(5):657-662. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-00911-0. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
10
Multiquadrant surgery in the robotic era: a technical description and outcomes for da Vinci Xi robotic subtotal colectomy and total proctocolectomy.机器人时代的多象限手术:达芬奇 Xi 机器人次全结肠切除术和全直肠结肠切除术的技术描述和结果。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Nov;34(11):5153-5159. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07633-1. Epub 2020 Sep 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Robot-Assisted Multiquadrant Operation: Proctocolectomy and Abdominoperineal Resection Using the Da Vinci Xi for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis With Rectal Carcinoma.机器人辅助多象限手术:使用达芬奇 Xi 系统进行家族性腺瘤性息肉病合并直肠癌的全直肠系膜切除术和腹会阴联合切除术
Cureus. 2025 May 30;17(5):e85107. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85107. eCollection 2025 May.
2
First Worldwide Report of a Total Colectomy with the Hugo RAS Platform.首例使用雨果RAS平台进行全结肠切除术的全球报告。
J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 11;13(20):6071. doi: 10.3390/jcm13206071.
3
Comparison of short-term outcomes and defecatory function following robotic and conventional laparoscopic surgery for stapled-ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a retrospective cohort study.机器人辅助与传统腹腔镜手术行吻合器回肠储袋肛管吻合术后短期结局及排便功能比较:一项回顾性队列研究
Int J Surg. 2024 Nov 1;110(11):7112-7120. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001994.
4
Robotic total colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis.机器人辅助全结肠切除术和回肠直肠吻合术。
Ann Coloproctol. 2024 Apr;40(2):186-187. doi: 10.3393/ac.2024.00066.0009. Epub 2024 Apr 22.
5
Update on Surgical Management of FAP.家族性腺瘤性息肉病外科治疗的最新进展
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2023 Apr 17;36(6):385-390. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1767707. eCollection 2023 Nov.
6
Application of the Xi robotic platform for familial adenomatous polyposis with ultra-low rectal cancer: exploration of minimally invasive and refined therapies.Xi 机器人平台在超低位直肠癌家族性腺瘤性息肉病中的应用:微创与精细化治疗的探索。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Aug;17(4):1843-1846. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01587-x. Epub 2023 Apr 3.
7
Robotic multiquadrant colorectal procedures: A single-center experience and a systematic review of the literature.机器人多象限结直肠手术:单中心经验及文献系统综述
Front Surg. 2022 Aug 17;9:991704. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.991704. eCollection 2022.
8
The art of robotic colonic resection: a review of progress in the past 5 years.机器人结肠切除术的艺术:过去 5 年进展综述。
Updates Surg. 2021 Jun;73(3):1037-1048. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00969-2. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
9
Multiquadrant surgery in the robotic era: a technical description and outcomes for da Vinci Xi robotic subtotal colectomy and total proctocolectomy.机器人时代的多象限手术:达芬奇 Xi 机器人次全结肠切除术和全直肠结肠切除术的技术描述和结果。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Nov;34(11):5153-5159. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07633-1. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
10
The da Vinci Xi system for robotic total/subtotal colectomy vs. conventional laparoscopy: short-term outcomes.达芬奇 Xi 系统机器人全结肠/次全结肠切除术与传统腹腔镜术:短期结果。
Tech Coloproctol. 2019 Sep;23(9):861-868. doi: 10.1007/s10151-019-02066-y. Epub 2019 Aug 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.机器人与腹腔镜微创治疗直肠癌的系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Ann Surg. 2018 Jun;267(6):1034-1046. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002523.
2
Robot-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: case-matched comparison of short-term surgical and functional outcomes between the da Vinci Xi and Si.达芬奇 Xi 和 Si 机器人辅助全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌:短期手术和功能结局的病例匹配比较。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Feb;32(2):589-600. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5708-5. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
3
Full Robotic Colorectal Resections for Cancer Combined With Other Major Surgical Procedures: Early Experience With the da Vinci Xi.全机器人结肠癌切除术联合其他大型外科手术:达芬奇 Xi 系统的早期经验
Surg Innov. 2017 Aug;24(4):321-327. doi: 10.1177/1553350617697183. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
4
Multiquadrant robotic colorectal surgery: the da Vinci Xi vs Si comparison.多象限机器人结直肠手术:达芬奇Xi系统与Si系统对比
J Robot Surg. 2018 Mar;12(1):67-74. doi: 10.1007/s11701-017-0689-x. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
5
Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery for colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.机器人辅助与腹腔镜辅助手术治疗结直肠癌:一项荟萃分析
Surg Endosc. 2016 Dec;30(12):5601-5614. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4892-z. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
6
Technique of Robotic-assisted Total Proctocolectomy with Lymphadenectomy and Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis for Transverse Colitic Cancer of Ulcerative Colitis, Using the Single Cart Position.采用单台车位行机器人辅助全结直肠切除术、淋巴结清扫术及回肠储袋肛管吻合术治疗溃疡性结肠炎横结肠型癌的技术
Surg Technol Int. 2015 Nov;27:86-92.
7
Comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches for total abdominal colectomy.开腹、腹腔镜及机器人辅助全腹结肠切除术的比较
Surg Endosc. 2016 Jul;30(7):2792-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4552-8. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
8
Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a prospective comparative study.机器人辅助与腹腔镜下直肠癌低位前切除术:一项前瞻性比较研究的短期结果
Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 Jun;16(6):1480-7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0435-3. Epub 2009 Mar 17.
9
Short-term outcomes after robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.机器人辅助直肠癌全直肠系膜切除术后的短期结局
Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Nov;14(11):3168-73. doi: 10.1245/s10434-007-9544-z. Epub 2007 Sep 1.
10
Robot-assisted vs. conventional laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a comparative study on costs and time.机器人辅助与传统腹腔镜直肠固定术治疗直肠脱垂:成本与时间的比较研究
Dis Colon Rectum. 2007 Nov;50(11):1825-30. doi: 10.1007/s10350-007-9017-2.

使用 Xi 机器人平台进行全腹部结肠切除术:微创结直肠手术的一大进步。

Use of the Xi robotic platform for total abdominal colectomy: a step forward in minimally invasive colorectal surgery.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., New York, NY, 10065, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2019 Mar;33(3):966-971. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6529-x. Epub 2018 Oct 22.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-018-6529-x
PMID:30350106
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6377813/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of the da Vinci robotic platform for total colectomy has been limited by the need to reposition the patient-side surgical cart from one side of the patient to the other, which increases operative time. In this study, we examined the feasibility of robotic total colectomy using the da Vinci Xi model, which offers a rotating boom-mounted system and laser-targeted trocar positioning.

METHODS

The study cohort consisted of 23 patients who underwent minimally invasive total colectomy for cancer or polyposis syndromes at a comprehensive cancer center between 2015 and 2017. Of the 23 colectomies, 15 were robotic and eight were laparoscopic. For the robotic colectomies, trocars were placed in the supraumbilical region and all four quadrants. The da Vinci Xi robot was placed between the patient's legs, and the boom was rotated from left to right and then to the middle in order to work sequentially on the right colon, the left colon, and the pelvis. Operating time and short-term outcomes were compared between the patients who underwent robotic surgery and the patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery.

RESULTS

The two groups of patients were comparable in age, gender, BMI, physical status, and disease types. In the robotic group, median length of stay (4 vs. 6 days, p = 0.047) was significantly shorter and median operative time (243 vs. 263 min, p = 0.97) and median estimated blood loss (50 vs. 100 ml; p = 0.08) were similar between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

With the da Vinci Xi boom-mounted system, total abdominal colectomy can be performed without the need to move the patient-side surgical cart and is associated with shorter length of stay and similar operative time compared to the laparoscopic approach.

摘要

背景

由于需要将患者侧手术车从患者一侧移动到另一侧,达芬奇机器人平台在全结肠切除术中的应用受到限制,这增加了手术时间。在这项研究中,我们检查了使用达芬奇 Xi 模型进行机器人全结肠切除术的可行性,该模型提供了旋转式臂架系统和激光靶向套管定位。

方法

该研究队列包括 23 名在 2015 年至 2017 年间在综合癌症中心接受微创全结肠切除术治疗癌症或息肉综合征的患者。在 23 例结肠切除术中,15 例为机器人手术,8 例为腹腔镜手术。对于机器人结肠切除术,套管针放置在上腹部区域和所有四个象限。达芬奇 Xi 机器人放置在患者双腿之间,臂架从左向右旋转,然后旋转到中间,以便依次对右半结肠、左半结肠和骨盆进行手术。比较了接受机器人手术和腹腔镜手术的患者的手术时间和短期结果。

结果

两组患者在年龄、性别、BMI、身体状况和疾病类型方面具有可比性。在机器人组中,中位住院时间(4 天与 6 天,p=0.047)明显缩短,中位手术时间(243 分钟与 263 分钟,p=0.97)和中位估计出血量(50 毫升与 100 毫升;p=0.08)相似。

结论

使用达芬奇 Xi 臂架系统,无需移动患者侧手术车即可进行全腹部结肠切除术,与腹腔镜方法相比,该方法具有较短的住院时间和相似的手术时间。