• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

倭黑猩猩的基频较高是由喉部形态决定的。

Higher fundamental frequency in bonobos is explained by larynx morphology.

机构信息

Department of Primatology, Max-Planck-Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany; Department of Human Behavior, Ecology and Culture, Max-Planck-Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany; Department of Linguistics, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany.

Department of Primatology, Max-Planck-Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany; Tai Chimpanzee Project, Centre Suisse de Recherches Scientifiques, Cote d'Ivoire.

出版信息

Curr Biol. 2018 Oct 22;28(20):R1188-R1189. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.09.030.

DOI:10.1016/j.cub.2018.09.030
PMID:30352185
Abstract

Acoustic signals, shaped by natural and sexual selection, reveal ecological and social selection pressures [1]. Examining acoustic signals together with morphology can be particularly revealing. But this approach has rarely been applied to primates, where clues to the evolutionary trajectory of human communication may be found. Across vertebrate species, there is a close relationship between body size and acoustic parameters, such as formant dispersion and fundamental frequency (f0). Deviations from this acoustic allometry usually produce calls with a lower f0 than expected for a given body size, often due to morphological adaptations in the larynx or vocal tract [2]. An unusual example of an obvious mismatch between fundamental frequency and body size is found in the two closest living relatives of humans, bonobos (Pan paniscus) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Although these two ape species overlap in body size [3], bonobo calls have a strikingly higher f0 than corresponding calls from chimpanzees [4]. Here, we compare acoustic structures of calls from bonobos and chimpanzees in relation to their larynx morphology. We found that shorter vocal fold length in bonobos compared to chimpanzees accounted for species differences in f0, showing a rare case of positive selection for signal diminution in both bonobo sexes.

摘要

声学信号通过自然和性选择形成,揭示了生态和社会选择压力[1]。同时研究声学信号和形态可以提供更深入的了解。但是,这种方法很少应用于灵长类动物,因为灵长类动物可能提供了人类交流进化轨迹的线索。在脊椎动物物种中,身体大小和声学参数之间存在密切关系,例如共振峰离散度和基频(f0)。这种声学比例关系的偏差通常会产生比预期的身体大小更低的 f0 的叫声,这通常是由于喉或声道的形态适应[2]。在人类最接近的两种活体亲属,倭黑猩猩(Pan paniscus)和黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)中,发现了一个基本频率与身体大小之间明显不匹配的不寻常例子。尽管这两个猿类物种在身体大小上重叠[3],但倭黑猩猩的叫声比黑猩猩的叫声具有明显更高的 f0[4]。在这里,我们比较了倭黑猩猩和黑猩猩叫声的声学结构与其喉形态的关系。我们发现,与黑猩猩相比,倭黑猩猩的声带长度较短,这解释了 f0 上的物种差异,表明在两性中对信号减弱的正选择是罕见的。

相似文献

1
Higher fundamental frequency in bonobos is explained by larynx morphology.倭黑猩猩的基频较高是由喉部形态决定的。
Curr Biol. 2018 Oct 22;28(20):R1188-R1189. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.09.030.
2
No evidence that maximum fundamental frequency reflects selection for signal diminution in bonobos.没有证据表明最大基频反映了对倭黑猩猩信号减弱的选择。
Curr Biol. 2019 Aug 5;29(15):R732-R733. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.06.022.
3
Segmental morphometrics of bonobos (Pan paniscus): are they really different from chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)?倭黑猩猩(Pan paniscus)的节段形态测量学:它们真的与黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)不同吗?
J Anat. 2018 Dec;233(6):843-853. doi: 10.1111/joa.12894. Epub 2018 Oct 7.
4
Volumetric and lateralized differences in selected brain regions of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and bonobos (Pan paniscus).黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)和倭黑猩猩(Pan paniscus)部分脑区的体积和侧化差异。
Am J Primatol. 2009 Dec;71(12):988-97. doi: 10.1002/ajp.20741.
5
Social play in bonobos (Pan paniscus) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): Implications for natural social systems and interindividual relationships.倭黑猩猩(Pan paniscus)和黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)的社会玩耍:对自然社会系统和个体间关系的启示
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2006 Mar;129(3):418-26. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.20289.
6
A Comparison Between Bonobos and Chimpanzees: A Review and Update.倭黑猩猩与黑猩猩的比较:综述与更新
Evol Anthropol. 2016 Sep;25(5):239-252. doi: 10.1002/evan.21501.
7
Bonobos have a more human-like second-to-fourth finger length ratio (2D:4D) than chimpanzees: a hypothesized indication of lower prenatal androgens.倭黑猩猩的食指与无名指长度比(2D:4D)比黑猩猩更接近人类,这是产前雄激素水平较低的一个假设指标。
J Hum Evol. 2009 Apr;56(4):361-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2008.12.004. Epub 2009 Mar 14.
8
The expression of empathy in human's closest relatives, bonobos and chimpanzees: current and future directions.在人类最亲近的亲属——倭黑猩猩和黑猩猩中表达同理心:当前和未来的方向。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2024 Aug;99(4):1556-1575. doi: 10.1111/brv.13080. Epub 2024 Apr 10.
9
Bonobo anatomy reveals stasis and mosaicism in chimpanzee evolution, and supports bonobos as the most appropriate extant model for the common ancestor of chimpanzees and humans.倭黑猩猩的解剖结构揭示了黑猩猩进化中的停滞和镶嵌现象,并支持将倭黑猩猩作为黑猩猩和人类共同祖先的最合适现存模式。
Sci Rep. 2017 Apr 4;7(1):608. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-00548-3.
10
Differences in the mutual eye gaze of bonobos (Pan paniscus) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).倭黑猩猩(Pan paniscus)和黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)相互注视眼球的差异。
J Comp Psychol. 2020 Aug;134(3):318-322. doi: 10.1037/com0000247.

引用本文的文献

1
Categorization and discrimination of human and non-human primate affective vocalizations: Investigation of frontal cortex activity through fNIRS.人类和非人类灵长类动物情感发声的分类与辨别:通过功能近红外光谱技术对额叶皮层活动的研究。
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2025 Feb 20;3. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00480. eCollection 2025.
2
Non-adjacent dependency processing (or lack thereof) in bonobos: an artificial grammar experiment.倭黑猩猩的非相邻依赖加工(或缺乏这种加工):一项人工语法实验。
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 Apr 23;12(4):242173. doi: 10.1098/rsos.242173. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Emotions mediate nonlinear phenomena production in the vocalizations of two ape species.
情绪在两种猿类的发声中调节非线性现象的产生。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2025 Apr 3;380(1923):20240013. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2024.0013.
4
Increased alertness and moderate ingroup cohesion in bonobos' response to outgroup cues.倭黑猩猩对外群线索的反应表现出更高的警觉性和适度的内群体凝聚力。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 21;19(8):e0307975. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307975. eCollection 2024.
5
The domestication of the larynx: The neural crest connection.喉的驯化:神经嵴的联系。
J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol. 2024 Jun;342(4):342-349. doi: 10.1002/jez.b.23251. Epub 2024 Apr 9.
6
Open plains are not a level playing field for hominid consonant-like versus vowel-like calls.开阔平原并非是同源人类辅音样发声与元音样发声的公平竞技场。
Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 21;13(1):21138. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-48165-7.
7
Frontal mechanisms underlying primate calls recognition by humans.人类识别灵长类动物叫声背后的额叶机制。
Cereb Cortex Commun. 2023 Nov 2;4(4):tgad019. doi: 10.1093/texcom/tgad019. eCollection 2023.
8
Auditory thresholds compatible with optimal speech reception likely evolved before the human-chimpanzee split.与人猿分歧前,可能就已经进化出了与最佳言语识别兼容的听觉阈限。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 25;13(1):20732. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47778-2.
9
Humans recognize affective cues in primate vocalizations: acoustic and phylogenetic perspectives.人类能够识别灵长类动物叫声中的情感线索:声学和系统发育的视角。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 5;13(1):10900. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37558-3.
10
Chinese striped-neck turtles vocalize underwater and show differences in peak frequency among different age and sex groups.中华花龟在水下发声,不同年龄和性别的龟在峰值频率上存在差异。
PeerJ. 2023 Jan 13;11:e14628. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14628. eCollection 2023.