• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人类能够识别灵长类动物叫声中的情感线索:声学和系统发育的视角。

Humans recognize affective cues in primate vocalizations: acoustic and phylogenetic perspectives.

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Educational Sciences and Swiss Center for Affective Sciences (CISA), Campus Biotech, University of Geneva, Chemin des Mines 9, 1202, Geneva, Switzerland.

Department of Psychology, University of York, York, UK.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 5;13(1):10900. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37558-3.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-37558-3
PMID:37407601
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10322975/
Abstract

Humans are adept at extracting affective information from vocalizations of humans and other animals. However, the extent to which human recognition of vocal affective cues of other species is due to cross-taxa similarities in acoustic parameters or the phylogenetic closeness between species is currently unclear. To address this, we first analyzed acoustic variation in 96 affective vocalizations, taken from agonistic and affiliative contexts, of humans and three other primates-rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta), chimpanzees and bonobos (Pan troglodytes and Pan paniscus). Acoustic analyses revealed that agonistic chimpanzee and bonobo vocalizations were similarly distant from agonistic human voices, but chimpanzee affiliative vocalizations were significantly closer to human affiliative vocalizations, than those of bonobos, indicating a potential derived vocal evolution in the bonobo lineage. Second, we asked 68 human participants to categorize and also discriminate vocalizations based on their presumed affective content. Results showed that participants reliably categorized human and chimpanzee vocalizations according to affective content, but not bonobo threat vocalizations nor any macaque vocalizations. Participants discriminated all species calls above chance level except for threat calls by bonobos and macaques. Our results highlight the importance of both phylogenetic and acoustic parameter level explanations in cross-species affective perception, drawing a more complex picture to the origin of vocal emotions.

摘要

人类善于从人类和其他动物的发声中提取情感信息。然而,目前尚不清楚人类对其他物种发声情感线索的识别是由于跨物种声学参数的相似性还是物种之间的亲缘关系。为了解决这个问题,我们首先分析了 96 种来自人类和三种其他灵长类动物(猕猴、黑猩猩和倭黑猩猩)的求偶和社交发声的声学变化。声学分析表明,求偶的黑猩猩和倭黑猩猩的发声与求偶的人类声音相似,但黑猩猩的社交发声与人类的社交发声更为相似,而不是与倭黑猩猩的相似,这表明倭黑猩猩的谱系中可能存在衍生的发声进化。其次,我们要求 68 名人类参与者根据其假定的情感内容对发声进行分类和区分。结果表明,参与者能够根据情感内容可靠地对人类和黑猩猩的发声进行分类,但不能对倭黑猩猩的威胁发声或任何猕猴的发声进行分类。参与者能够区分所有物种的叫声,除了倭黑猩猩和猕猴的威胁叫声。我们的研究结果强调了在跨物种情感感知中,种系发生和声学参数水平解释的重要性,为发声情感的起源描绘了一幅更为复杂的图景。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b725/10322975/d5867636fd53/41598_2023_37558_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b725/10322975/0bc0be856b05/41598_2023_37558_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b725/10322975/aa8db7e39514/41598_2023_37558_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b725/10322975/b27940d7c0cb/41598_2023_37558_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b725/10322975/d5867636fd53/41598_2023_37558_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b725/10322975/0bc0be856b05/41598_2023_37558_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b725/10322975/aa8db7e39514/41598_2023_37558_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b725/10322975/b27940d7c0cb/41598_2023_37558_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b725/10322975/d5867636fd53/41598_2023_37558_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Humans recognize affective cues in primate vocalizations: acoustic and phylogenetic perspectives.人类能够识别灵长类动物叫声中的情感线索:声学和系统发育的视角。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 5;13(1):10900. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37558-3.
2
Personality in Bonobos.倭黑猩猩的个性
Psychol Sci. 2015 Sep;26(9):1430-9. doi: 10.1177/0956797615589933. Epub 2015 Jul 24.
3
Comparing infant and juvenile behavior in bonobos (Pan paniscus) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): a preliminary study.倭黑猩猩(Pan paniscus)与黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)婴幼儿行为比较:一项初步研究。
Primates. 2006 Oct;47(4):287-93. doi: 10.1007/s10329-006-0179-7. Epub 2006 May 9.
4
Human listeners' perception of behavioural context and core affect dimensions in chimpanzee vocalizations.人类听众对黑猩猩叫声中行为背景和核心情感维度的感知。
Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Jun 24;287(1929):20201148. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.1148. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
5
Ape gestures and language evolution.猿类手势与语言进化
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 May 8;104(19):8184-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0702624104. Epub 2007 Apr 30.
6
Higher fundamental frequency in bonobos is explained by larynx morphology.倭黑猩猩的基频较高是由喉部形态决定的。
Curr Biol. 2018 Oct 22;28(20):R1188-R1189. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.09.030.
7
Share your sweets: Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) and bonobo (Pan paniscus) willingness to share highly attractive, monopolizable food sources.分享你的糖果:黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)和倭黑猩猩(Pan paniscus)分享极具吸引力、可独占的食物来源的意愿。
J Comp Psychol. 2015 Aug;129(3):218-28. doi: 10.1037/a0039351. Epub 2015 Jun 15.
8
Bonobo anatomy reveals stasis and mosaicism in chimpanzee evolution, and supports bonobos as the most appropriate extant model for the common ancestor of chimpanzees and humans.倭黑猩猩的解剖结构揭示了黑猩猩进化中的停滞和镶嵌现象,并支持将倭黑猩猩作为黑猩猩和人类共同祖先的最合适现存模式。
Sci Rep. 2017 Apr 4;7(1):608. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-00548-3.
9
On the tool use behavior of the bonobo-chimpanzee last common ancestor, and the origins of hominine stone tool use.关于倭黑猩猩与黑猩猩的最近共同祖先的工具使用行为,以及人亚科石器使用的起源。
Am J Primatol. 2014 Oct;76(10):910-8. doi: 10.1002/ajp.22284. Epub 2014 Apr 7.
10
Frontal mechanisms underlying primate calls recognition by humans.人类识别灵长类动物叫声背后的额叶机制。
Cereb Cortex Commun. 2023 Nov 2;4(4):tgad019. doi: 10.1093/texcom/tgad019. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Categorization and discrimination of human and non-human primate affective vocalizations: Investigation of frontal cortex activity through fNIRS.人类和非人类灵长类动物情感发声的分类与辨别:通过功能近红外光谱技术对额叶皮层活动的研究。
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2025 Feb 20;3. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00480. eCollection 2025.
2
The role of musical pitch in long-distance defensive signaling.音高在远距离防御信号中的作用。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2025 Aug;1550(1):206-226. doi: 10.1111/nyas.70000. Epub 2025 Jul 22.
3
Formant analysis of vertebrate vocalizations: achievements, pitfalls, and promises.

本文引用的文献

1
Age, empathy, familiarity, domestication and call features enhance human perception of animal emotion expressions.年龄、同理心、熟悉程度、驯化程度和叫声特征会增强人类对动物情感表达的感知。
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Dec 7;9(12):221138. doi: 10.1098/rsos.221138. eCollection 2022 Dec.
2
Cross-species discrimination of vocal expression of emotional valence by Equidae and Suidae.马科动物和猪科动物对情绪效价的声音表达的跨物种辨别。
BMC Biol. 2022 May 24;20(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12915-022-01311-5.
3
Human Discrimination and Categorization of Emotions in Voices: A Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) Study.
脊椎动物发声的共振峰分析:成就、陷阱与前景。
BMC Biol. 2025 Apr 7;23(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12915-025-02188-w.
4
Rough is salient: a conserved vocal niche to hijack the brain's salience system.粗糙音显著:一个用于劫持大脑显著性系统的保守发声生态位。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2025 Apr 3;380(1923):20240020. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2024.0020.
5
Frontal mechanisms underlying primate calls recognition by humans.人类识别灵长类动物叫声背后的额叶机制。
Cereb Cortex Commun. 2023 Nov 2;4(4):tgad019. doi: 10.1093/texcom/tgad019. eCollection 2023.
6
Towards a great ape dictionary: Inexperienced humans understand common nonhuman ape gestures.迈向大型猿类词典:非专业人类理解常见的非人类猿类手势。
PLoS Biol. 2023 Jan 24;21(1):e3001939. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001939. eCollection 2023 Jan.
7
Context and prediction matter for the interpretation of social interactions across species.语境和预测对于跨物种社会互动的解释很重要。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 7;17(12):e0277783. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277783. eCollection 2022.
人类对声音中情感的辨别与分类:一项功能近红外光谱(fNIRS)研究。
Front Neurosci. 2020 Jun 5;14:570. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00570. eCollection 2020.
4
Human listeners' perception of behavioural context and core affect dimensions in chimpanzee vocalizations.人类听众对黑猩猩叫声中行为背景和核心情感维度的感知。
Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Jun 24;287(1929):20201148. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.1148. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
5
Emotional expressions in human and non-human great apes.人类和非人类的大型猿类的情感表达。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020 Aug;115:378-395. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.01.027. Epub 2020 Jan 25.
6
Higher fundamental frequency in bonobos is explained by larynx morphology.倭黑猩猩的基频较高是由喉部形态决定的。
Curr Biol. 2018 Oct 22;28(20):R1188-R1189. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.09.030.
7
Human behavioural discrimination of human, chimpanzee and macaque affective vocalisations is reflected by the neural response in the superior temporal sulcus.人类在高级颞叶回中的神经反应反映了人类、黑猩猩和猕猴情感发声的行为歧视。
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Mar;111:145-150. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.01.026. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
8
Biased and unbiased perceptual decision-making on vocal emotions.对声音情绪的有偏和无偏感知决策。
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 24;7(1):16274. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-16594-w.
9
Human Novelty Response to Emotional Animal Vocalizations: Effects of Phylogeny and Familiarity.人类对情绪化动物叫声的新奇反应:系统发育和熟悉度的影响。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2017 Oct 24;11:204. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00204. eCollection 2017.
10
Humans recognize emotional arousal in vocalizations across all classes of terrestrial vertebrates: evidence for acoustic universals.人类能够识别所有陆地脊椎动物类群发声中的情绪唤醒:声学普遍性的证据。
Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Jul 26;284(1859). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.0990.