• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[评估慢性病患者脆弱性量表的设计与验证]

[Design and validation of the scale to assess the fragility of chronic patients].

作者信息

Núñez-Montenegro Antonio Jesús, Martín-Yañez Victoria, Roldan-Liébana María Ángeles, González-Ruiz Francisca Dolores, Fernández-Romero Rita, Narbona-Ríos Cristina

机构信息

Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Archidona, Área Sanitaria Norte de Málaga, Archidona, Málaga, España; Miembro del grupo de investigación en Cuidados de Málaga IBIMA AE-20 INVESCUIDA; Miembro de la Red de Investigación al Final de la Vida (Red-Eol).

Atención primaria, Área Sanitaria Norte de Málaga, Málaga, España.

出版信息

Aten Primaria. 2019 Oct;51(8):486-493. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2018.06.002. Epub 2018 Oct 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.aprim.2018.06.002
PMID:30352702
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6837145/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To create a scale and tool that allows us to measure the fragility of the chronic patient.

DESIGN

Observational study on the area's chronicles.

LOCATION

Between January 2011 and December 2015, a population of 2108 individuals. Data were collected from the medical history and expressed application for the registration of fragile patients, on structured data collection sheet.

PARTICIPANTS

Fragile subjects of the North Sanitary Area of Malaga.

INTERVENTION

Design and validation of a scale.

MAIN MEASUREMENTS

Study variables.

MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLE

Antequera Fragility Scale (EPADI) consisting of five criteria / factors: age, Pfeiffer, Barthell, Charlson, sociofamiliar and pluripatological. Accessibility outcome variables were used as prediction variables. Quantitative variables are described by mean and standard deviation. The qualitative variables are presented in frequencies along with their percentages. To obtain a predictive model of resource utilization the sample was divided into two subsamples of equal size.

RESULTS

From the variables of interest by experts, univariate predictors were identified in the use of resources in the sample M_EPADI1, to construct a model of multivariate logistic regression that allows to predict the resource utilization. For the validation of the scale, the sample M_EPADI2 was used.

CONCLUSIONS

It was verified that the criteria used in our scale are adequate to define the fragility, therefore the EPADI scale perfectly values the degree of fragility of chronic users based on the resources consumed.

CONCLUSIONS

It has been verified that the criteria used in our scale are adequate to define the fragility, therefore the EPADI scale perfectly evaluates the degree of fragility of chronic users based on the resources consumed.

摘要

目的

创建一种量表和工具,以便我们能够测量慢性病患者的脆弱性。

设计

对该地区慢性病记录进行观察性研究。

地点

2011年1月至2015年12月期间,共2108人。从病历中收集数据,并在结构化数据收集表上填写脆弱患者登记的相关申请。

参与者

马拉加北部卫生区的脆弱人群。

干预措施

量表的设计与验证。

主要测量指标

研究变量。

主要结局变量

安特克拉脆弱性量表(EPADI),由五个标准/因素组成:年龄、 Pfeiffer、Barthell、Charlson、社会家庭因素和多病共存因素。将可及性结局变量用作预测变量。定量变量用均值和标准差描述。定性变量以频率及其百分比呈现。为获得资源利用的预测模型,将样本分为两个大小相等的子样本。

结果

从专家感兴趣的变量中,在样本M_EPADI1的资源使用中确定了单变量预测因子,以构建多元逻辑回归模型来预测资源利用情况。为验证该量表,使用了样本M_EPADI2。

结论

经证实,我们量表中使用的标准足以定义脆弱性,因此EPADI量表能够根据所消耗的资源完美地评估慢性病患者的脆弱程度。

结论

经证实,我们量表中使用的标准足以定义脆弱性,因此EPADI量表能够根据所消耗的资源完美地评价慢性病患者的脆弱程度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75dc/6837145/664b7ecd9255/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75dc/6837145/da8c7e83a833/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75dc/6837145/664b7ecd9255/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75dc/6837145/da8c7e83a833/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75dc/6837145/664b7ecd9255/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
[Design and validation of the scale to assess the fragility of chronic patients].[评估慢性病患者脆弱性量表的设计与验证]
Aten Primaria. 2019 Oct;51(8):486-493. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2018.06.002. Epub 2018 Oct 21.
2
Grip strength measurement for frailty assessment in patients with vascular disease and associations with comorbidity, cardiac risk, and sarcopenia.握力测量用于评估血管疾病患者的虚弱程度,以及与合并症、心脏风险和肌肉减少症的关系。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 May;67(5):1512-1520. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.08.078. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
3
FRAILTOOLS study protocol: a comprehensive validation of frailty assessment tools to screen and diagnose frailty in different clinical and social settings and to provide instruments for integrated care in older adults.FRAILTOOLS 研究方案:全面验证虚弱评估工具,以在不同临床和社会环境中筛查和诊断虚弱,并为老年人的综合护理提供工具。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Mar 18;19(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1042-1.
4
Feasibility and Factor Structure of the FRAIL Scale in Older Adults.衰弱量表在老年人中的可行性和因子结构。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Apr 1;18(4):367.e11-367.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.12.067. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
5
Importance of frailty evaluation in the prediction of the prognosis of patients with chronic subdural hematoma.衰弱评估在预测慢性硬脑膜下血肿患者预后中的重要性。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2018 Aug;18(8):1173-1176. doi: 10.1111/ggi.13436. Epub 2018 May 17.
6
[Study of the fragility phenotype among elderly residents in the community].社区老年居民中脆弱表型的研究
Cien Saude Colet. 2019 Oct 28;24(11):4201-4210. doi: 10.1590/1413-812320182411.31072017. eCollection 2019.
7
Development and validation of 15-month mortality prediction models: a retrospective observational comparison of machine-learning techniques in a national sample of Medicare recipients.开发和验证 15 个月死亡率预测模型:对全国医疗保险接受者样本中机器学习技术的回顾性观察比较。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 16;9(7):e022935. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022935.
8
Heterogeneity of Different Tools for Detecting the Prevalence of Frailty in Nursing Homes: Feasibility and Meaning of Different Approaches.不同工具检测养老院衰弱患病率的异质性:不同方法的可行性和意义。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Oct 1;18(10):898.e1-898.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.06.016. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
9
Predictive validity of the Brazilian version of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator for adverse health outcomes in older adults.巴西版蒂尔堡虚弱指标对老年人不良健康结局的预测效度。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2018 May-Jun;76:114-119. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2018.02.013. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
10
A Novel Tool for the Early Identification of Frailty in Elderly People: The Application in Primary Care Settings.一种用于老年人虚弱早期识别的新型工具:在基层医疗环境中的应用。
J Frailty Aging. 2020;9(2):101-106. doi: 10.14283/jfa.2019.41.

引用本文的文献

1
Challenges and improvement strategies in the hospitalization of chronic multimorbid patients.慢性多病患者住院治疗中的挑战与改进策略
World J Clin Cases. 2025 Jan 26;13(3):98284. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v13.i3.98284.

本文引用的文献

1
[Process-based approach neuropsychological assessment: review of the evidence and proposal for improvement of dementia screening tools].[基于过程的方法进行神经心理学评估:证据综述及痴呆筛查工具改进建议]
Rev Neurol. 2017 Jun 1;64(11):514-524.
2
[FINDRISC Test: Relationship between cardiovascular risk parameters and scales in Spanish Mediterranean population].[芬兰糖尿病风险评分测试:西班牙地中海人群中心血管风险参数与量表之间的关系]
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2017 May-Jun;55(3):309-316.
3
Associations of frailty with health care costs--results of the ESTHER cohort study.
衰弱与医疗保健费用的关联——埃丝特队列研究结果
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Apr 14;16:128. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1360-3.
4
Frailty in older persons: multisystem risk factors and the Frailty Risk Index (FRI).老年人的衰弱:多系统风险因素与衰弱风险指数(FRI)
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014 Sep;15(9):635-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2014.03.008. Epub 2014 Apr 17.
5
The hospital-dependent patient.依赖医院的患者。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Feb 20;370(8):694-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1315568.
6
[Adherence to treatment, by active ingredient, in patients over 65 years on multiple medication].[65岁以上使用多种药物治疗患者按活性成分统计的治疗依从性]
Aten Primaria. 2014 May;46(5):238-45. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2013.10.003. Epub 2013 Dec 27.
7
[Case management and complex chronic diseases: concepts, models, evidence and uncertainties].[病例管理与复杂慢性病:概念、模式、证据与不确定性]
Enferm Clin. 2014 Jan-Feb;24(1):23-34. doi: 10.1016/j.enfcli.2013.10.002. Epub 2013 Dec 5.
8
Specialized nursing practice for chronic disease management in the primary care setting: an evidence-based analysis.基层医疗环境中慢性病管理的专科护理实践:基于证据的分析
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2013 Sep 1;13(10):1-66. eCollection 2013.
9
[Validation of a questionnaire to evaluate patient safety in clinical laboratories].
Gac Sanit. 2012 Nov-Dec;26(6):560-5. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2011.12.012. Epub 2012 May 3.
10
[Study of polymedicated patients over 65 years-old in an urban primary care centre].[城市基层医疗中心65岁以上多重用药患者的研究]
Rev Calid Asist. 2011 Mar-Apr;26(2):90-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cali.2010.10.002. Epub 2011 Feb 23.