• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证时间在范围内作为糖尿病临床试验的结果测量。

Validation of Time in Range as an Outcome Measure for Diabetes Clinical Trials.

机构信息

Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL

International Diabetes Center Park Nicollet, Minneapolis, MN.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2019 Mar;42(3):400-405. doi: 10.2337/dc18-1444. Epub 2018 Oct 23.

DOI:10.2337/dc18-1444
PMID:30352896
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6905478/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the association of time in range (TIR) of 70-180 mg/dL (3.9-10 mmol/L) with the development or progression of retinopathy and development of microalbuminuria using the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) data set in order to validate the use of TIR as an outcome measure for clinical trials.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

In the DCCT, blood glucose concentrations were measured at a central laboratory from seven fingerstick samples (seven-point testing: pre- and 90-min postmeals and at bedtime) collected during 1 day every 3 months. Retinopathy progression was assessed every 6 months and urinary microalbuminuria development every 12 months. Proportional hazards models were used to assess the association of TIR and other glycemic metrics, computed from the seven-point fingerstick data, with the rate of development of microvascular complications.

RESULTS

Mean TIR of seven-point profiles for the 1,440 participants was 41 ± 16%. The hazard rate of development of retinopathy progression was increased by 64% (95% CI 51-78), and development of the microalbuminuria outcome was increased by 40% (95% CI 25-56), for each 10 percentage points lower TIR ( < 0.001 for each). Results were similar for mean glucose and hyperglycemia metrics.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on these results, a compelling case can be made that TIR is strongly associated with the risk of microvascular complications and should be an acceptable end point for clinical trials. Although hemoglobin A remains a valuable outcome metric in clinical trials, TIR and other glycemic metrics-especially when measured with continuous glucose monitoring-add value as outcome measures in many studies.

摘要

目的

本研究使用糖尿病控制与并发症试验(DCCT)数据集评估 70-180mg/dL(3.9-10mmol/L)范围内时间(TIR)与视网膜病变发展或进展以及微量白蛋白尿发展的相关性,以验证 TIR 作为临床试验结果衡量指标的适用性。

研究设计和方法

在 DCCT 中,每 3 个月采集 1 天内的 7 个指尖样本(七点检测:餐前和 90 分钟餐后以及睡前),由中心实验室测量血糖浓度。每 6 个月评估视网膜病变进展情况,每 12 个月评估尿微量白蛋白尿进展情况。采用比例风险模型评估 TIR 与其他从七点指尖数据计算得出的血糖指标与微血管并发症发展速度的相关性。

结果

1440 名参与者的七点血糖 TIR 平均值为 41±16%。TIR 每降低 10 个百分点,视网膜病变进展的发生风险增加 64%(95%CI 51-78),微量白蛋白尿结局的发生风险增加 40%(95%CI 25-56)(均<0.001)。平均血糖和高血糖指标的结果类似。

结论

基于这些结果,可以强有力地证明 TIR 与微血管并发症风险密切相关,应该成为临床试验的可接受终点。尽管血红蛋白 A 仍然是临床试验中有价值的结果衡量指标,但 TIR 和其他血糖指标——尤其是当使用连续血糖监测测量时——作为许多研究的结果衡量指标具有附加价值。

相似文献

1
Validation of Time in Range as an Outcome Measure for Diabetes Clinical Trials.验证时间在范围内作为糖尿病临床试验的结果测量。
Diabetes Care. 2019 Mar;42(3):400-405. doi: 10.2337/dc18-1444. Epub 2018 Oct 23.
2
Differences for Percentage Times in Glycemic Range Between Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Capillary Blood Glucose Monitoring in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes: Analysis of the REPLACE-BG Dataset.1 型糖尿病成人中连续血糖监测与毛细血管血糖监测的血糖范围内时间百分比差异:REPLACE-BG 数据集分析。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2020 Mar;22(3):222-227. doi: 10.1089/dia.2019.0276. Epub 2019 Nov 1.
3
The Relationships Between Time in Range, Hyperglycemia Metrics, and HbA1c.血糖达标时间、高血糖指标与糖化血红蛋白之间的关系。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2019 Jul;13(4):614-626. doi: 10.1177/1932296818822496. Epub 2019 Jan 13.
4
Association of Glycemic Variability in Type 1 Diabetes With Progression of Microvascular Outcomes in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial.1型糖尿病血糖变异性与糖尿病控制及并发症试验中微血管结局进展的关联
Diabetes Care. 2017 Jun;40(6):777-783. doi: 10.2337/dc16-2426. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
5
The Relationship of Hemoglobin A1C to Time-in-Range in Patients with Diabetes.血红蛋白 A1C 与糖尿病患者达标时间的关系。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2019 Feb;21(2):81-85. doi: 10.1089/dia.2018.0310. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
6
Glycated Hemoglobin A1c Time in Range and Dementia in Older Adults With Diabetes.糖化血红蛋白 A1c 时间达标与老年糖尿病患者痴呆
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2425354. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.25354.
7
Association of Estimated Time-in-Range Capillary Glucose Levels Versus HbA1c With Progression of Microvascular Complications in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial.在糖尿病控制和并发症试验中,毛细血管葡萄糖时间范围内估计值与 HbA1c 与微血管并发症进展的相关性。
Diabetes Care. 2022 Oct 1;45(10):2445-2448. doi: 10.2337/dc21-2298.
8
Metrics Beyond Hemoglobin A1C in Diabetes Management: Time in Range, Hypoglycemia, and Other Parameters.糖尿病管理中糖化血红蛋白(A1C)之外的指标:血糖达标时间、低血糖及其他参数
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2017 May;19(S2):S16-S26. doi: 10.1089/dia.2017.0029.
9
The absence of a glycemic threshold for the development of long-term complications: the perspective of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial.长期并发症发生不存在血糖阈值:糖尿病控制与并发症试验的观点
Diabetes. 1996 Oct;45(10):1289-98.
10
Translating glycated hemoglobin A1c into time spent in glucose target range: A multicenter study.糖化血红蛋白 A1c 与血糖达标时间的转换:一项多中心研究。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2019 May;20(3):339-344. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12817. Epub 2019 Jan 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Beyond Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD): Rethinking Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) Evaluation for Real-World Diabetes Care.超越平均绝对相对差异(MARD):重新思考用于现实世界糖尿病护理的连续血糖监测(CGM)评估
Cureus. 2025 Sep 1;17(9):e91427. doi: 10.7759/cureus.91427. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Using Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) to understand occupation from the perspective of the experiencing self: An illustrative example in workers with type 1 diabetes.运用生态瞬时评估(EMA)从体验自我的角度理解职业:1型糖尿病患者的一个实例
J Occup Sci. 2024 Dec 3. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2024.2431138.
3
Time in Tight Range (TITR) stratified by Coefficient of Variation (CV) in a cohort of patients with type 1 Diabetes Mellitus and Multiple Daily Injections. A real-life study.在1型糖尿病和每日多次注射患者队列中,按变异系数(CV)分层的血糖处于紧密范围的时间(TITR)。一项真实世界研究。
Endocrine. 2025 Aug 26. doi: 10.1007/s12020-025-04379-5.
4
Once-weekly insulin icodec vs. daily insulin glargine in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis with longitudinal insights.2型糖尿病中每周一次胰岛素icodec与每日一次甘精胰岛素的比较:一项具有纵向见解的荟萃分析
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025 Jun 10;87(7):4452-4466. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000003392. eCollection 2025 Jul.
5
Impaired central thyroid hormone sensitivity is associated with time in range in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the euthyroid population.在甲状腺功能正常的2型糖尿病患者中,中枢甲状腺激素敏感性受损与血糖达标时间相关。
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2025 Aug 14;17(1):332. doi: 10.1186/s13098-025-01911-5.
6
Time-Restricted Eating Improves Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.限时进食改善2型糖尿病患者的血糖控制:一项荟萃分析与系统评价
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Jul 29;26(15):7310. doi: 10.3390/ijms26157310.
7
DASH4D diet for glycemic control and glucose variability in type 2 diabetes: a randomized crossover trial.DASH4D饮食对2型糖尿病患者血糖控制及血糖变异性的影响:一项随机交叉试验
Nat Med. 2025 Aug 5. doi: 10.1038/s41591-025-03823-3.
8
A Prospective Study of the Correlation Between Time in Range and Incidence of Diabetic Cardiovascular Autonomic Neuropathy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.2型糖尿病患者血糖达标时间与糖尿病心血管自主神经病变发生率相关性的前瞻性研究
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2025 Jul 29;18:2585-2596. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S526784. eCollection 2025.
9
Association of the time in targeted blood glucose range of 140 to 180 mg/dL with the mortality of critically ill patients with diabetes: analysis of the MIMIC-IV database.糖尿病重症患者目标血糖范围在140至180mg/dL的时间与死亡率的关联:MIMIC-IV数据库分析
J Clin Transl Endocrinol. 2025 Jul 22;41:100413. doi: 10.1016/j.jcte.2025.100413. eCollection 2025 Sep.
10
ROCKET T1D Remote Patient Monitoring Program: Launching Diabetes Management Habits in New-Onset Diabetes.ROCKET T1D远程患者监测项目:在新发糖尿病中培养糖尿病管理习惯。
Clin Diabetes. 2025 Feb 11;43(3):371-377. doi: 10.2337/cd24-0065. eCollection 2025 Summer.

本文引用的文献

1
Need for Regulatory Change to Incorporate Beyond A1C Glycemic Metrics.需要进行监管变革以纳入糖化血红蛋白(A1C)以外的血糖指标。
Diabetes Care. 2018 Jun;41(6):e92-e94. doi: 10.2337/dci18-0010.
2
Does Time-in-Range Matter? Perspectives From People With Diabetes on the Success of Current Therapies and the Drivers of Improved Outcomes.血糖在目标范围内的时间重要吗?糖尿病患者对当前治疗效果及改善预后驱动因素的看法。
Clin Diabetes. 2018 Apr;36(2):112-119. doi: 10.2337/cd17-0094.
3
International Consensus on Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring.连续血糖监测应用的国际共识
Diabetes Care. 2017 Dec;40(12):1631-1640. doi: 10.2337/dc17-1600.
4
Standardizing Clinically Meaningful Outcome Measures Beyond HbA for Type 1 Diabetes: A Consensus Report of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, the American Association of Diabetes Educators, the American Diabetes Association, the Endocrine Society, JDRF International, The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust, the Pediatric Endocrine Society, and the T1D Exchange.1型糖尿病HbA之外临床有意义结局指标的标准化:美国临床内分泌医师协会、美国糖尿病教育者协会、美国糖尿病协会、内分泌学会、国际青少年糖尿病研究基金会、利昂娜·M.和哈里·B.赫尔姆斯利慈善信托基金、儿科内分泌学会以及T1D交流组织的共识报告
Diabetes Care. 2017 Dec;40(12):1622-1630. doi: 10.2337/dc17-1624.
5
The Fallacy of Average: How Using HbA Alone to Assess Glycemic Control Can Be Misleading.平均的谬误:仅使用糖化血红蛋白(HbA)来评估血糖控制如何会产生误导。
Diabetes Care. 2017 Aug;40(8):994-999. doi: 10.2337/dc17-0636.
6
Association of Glycemic Variability in Type 1 Diabetes With Progression of Microvascular Outcomes in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial.1型糖尿病血糖变异性与糖尿病控制及并发症试验中微血管结局进展的关联
Diabetes Care. 2017 Jun;40(6):777-783. doi: 10.2337/dc16-2426. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
7
Metrics for glycaemic control - from HbA to continuous glucose monitoring.血糖控制的指标——从 HbA 到连续血糖监测。
Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2017 Jul;13(7):425-436. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2017.3. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
8
Diurnal Differences in Risk of Cardiac Arrhythmias During Spontaneous Hypoglycemia in Young People With Type 1 Diabetes.年轻人 1 型糖尿病患者自发性低血糖期间心律失常风险的昼夜差异。
Diabetes Care. 2017 May;40(5):655-662. doi: 10.2337/dc16-2177. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
9
Glucose Concentrations of Less Than 3.0 mmol/L (54 mg/dL) Should Be Reported in Clinical Trials: A Joint Position Statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes.临床试验中应报告低于3.0 mmol/L(54 mg/dL)的血糖浓度:美国糖尿病协会和欧洲糖尿病研究协会的联合立场声明
Diabetes Care. 2017 Jan;40(1):155-157. doi: 10.2337/dc16-2215. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
10
Mechanistic modeling of hemoglobin glycation and red blood cell kinetics enables personalized diabetes monitoring.血红蛋白糖化和红细胞动力学的机制建模可实现个性化糖尿病监测。
Sci Transl Med. 2016 Oct 5;8(359):359ra130. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf9304.