• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

术中特征改善冠状动脉旁路移植术后模型风险预测

Intraoperative Features Improve Model Risk Predictions After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

作者信息

Potosnak Willa, Dufendach Keith A, Nagpal Chirag, Kaczorowski David J, Yoon Pyongsoo, Bonatti Johannes, Miller James K, Dubrawski Artur W

机构信息

Auton Lab, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg Short Rep. 2024 Mar 7;2(3):336-340. doi: 10.1016/j.atssr.2024.02.005. eCollection 2024 Sep.

DOI:10.1016/j.atssr.2024.02.005
PMID:39790416
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11708469/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative physiologic parameters could offer predictive utility in evaluating risk of adverse postoperative events yet are not included in current standard risk models. This study examined whether the inclusion of continuous intraoperative data improved machine learning model predictions for multiple outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting, including 30-day mortality, renal failure, reoperation, prolonged ventilation, and combined morbidity and mortality (MM).

METHODS

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) database features and risk scores were combined with retrospectively gathered continuous intraoperative data from patients. Risk models were developed for each outcome by training a logistic regression classifier on intraoperative data using 5-fold cross-validation. STS risk scores were included as offset terms in the models.

RESULTS

Compared with the STS Risk Calculator, models developed using a combination of the intraoperative features and the STS preoperative risk score had improved mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for prolonged ventilation (0.750 [95% CI, 0.690-0.809] vs 0.800 [95% CI, 0.750-0.851]) and MM (0.695 [95% CI, 0.644-0.746] vs 0.724 [95% CI, 0.673-0.775]). Additionally, models developed using intraoperative features had improved calibration, measured with Brier score, for prolonged ventilation (0.060 [95% CI, 0.050-0.070] vs 0.055 [95% CI, 0.045-0.065]) and MM (0.092 [95% CI, 0.081-0.103] vs 0.087 [95% CI, 0.075-0.098]).

CONCLUSIONS

The inclusion of time series intraoperative data in risk models may improve early postoperative care by identifying patients who require closer monitoring postoperatively.

摘要

背景

术中生理参数在评估术后不良事件风险方面具有预测作用,但目前的标准风险模型中并未纳入这些参数。本研究探讨了纳入连续术中数据是否能改善机器学习模型对冠状动脉搭桥术后多种结局的预测,这些结局包括30天死亡率、肾衰竭、再次手术、通气时间延长以及合并症和死亡率(MM)。

方法

将胸外科医师协会(STS)数据库特征和风险评分与回顾性收集的患者术中连续数据相结合。通过使用五折交叉验证在术中数据上训练逻辑回归分类器,为每个结局建立风险模型。STS风险评分作为偏移项纳入模型。

结果

与STS风险计算器相比,使用术中特征和STS术前风险评分相结合开发的模型在通气时间延长(0.750 [95%CI,0.690 - 0.809] 对 0.800 [95%CI,0.750 - 0.851])和MM(0.695 [95%CI,0.644 - 0.746] 对 0.724 [95%CI,0.673 - 0.775])方面,受试者工作特征曲线下的平均面积有所改善。此外,使用术中特征开发的模型在通气时间延长(0.060 [95%CI,0.050 - 0.070] 对 0.055 [95%CI,0.045 - 0.065])和MM(0.092 [95%CI,0.081 - 0.103] 对 0.087 [95%CI,0.075 - 0.098])方面,以Brier评分衡量的校准有所改善。

结论

在风险模型中纳入术中时间序列数据可能通过识别术后需要更密切监测的患者来改善术后早期护理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14be/11708469/3c1c8bafd52b/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14be/11708469/8471806a50cf/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14be/11708469/d86228639fa4/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14be/11708469/3c1c8bafd52b/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14be/11708469/8471806a50cf/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14be/11708469/d86228639fa4/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14be/11708469/3c1c8bafd52b/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Intraoperative Features Improve Model Risk Predictions After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.术中特征改善冠状动脉旁路移植术后模型风险预测
Ann Thorac Surg Short Rep. 2024 Mar 7;2(3):336-340. doi: 10.1016/j.atssr.2024.02.005. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Toward Dynamic Risk Prediction of Outcomes After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft: Improving Risk Prediction With Intraoperative Events Using Gradient Boosting.基于术中事件的梯度提升算法实现冠状动脉旁路移植术后结局的动态风险预测:改善风险预测。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2021 Jun;14(6):e007363. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.007363. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
3
Predicting lack of clinical improvement following varicose vein ablation using machine learning.使用机器学习预测静脉曲张消融术后临床改善不佳的情况。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2025 May;13(3):102162. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.102162. Epub 2024 Dec 26.
4
Machine-learning Models Predict 30-Day Mortality, Cardiovascular Complications, and Respiratory Complications After Aseptic Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty.机器学习模型预测无菌翻修全关节置换术后 30 天死亡率、心血管并发症和呼吸系统并发症。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Nov 1;480(11):2137-2145. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002276. Epub 2022 Jun 20.
5
Machine learning algorithms for population-specific risk score in coronary artery bypass grafting.用于冠状动脉旁路移植术的特定人群风险评分的机器学习算法。
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2023 May;31(4):348-356. doi: 10.1177/02184923231171493. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
6
Can Predictive Modeling Tools Identify Patients at High Risk of Prolonged Opioid Use After ACL Reconstruction?预测模型工具能否识别 ACL 重建术后阿片类药物使用时间延长的高风险患者?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Jul;478(7):0-1618. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001251.
7
Using machine learning to predict outcomes following suprainguinal bypass.使用机器学习预测腹股沟上旁路术后的结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Mar;79(3):593-608.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.09.037. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
8
Comparison of Machine Learning Models Including Preoperative, Intraoperative, and Postoperative Data and Mortality After Cardiac Surgery.机器学习模型的比较,包括术前、术中、术后数据与心脏手术后死亡率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Oct 3;5(10):e2237970. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.37970.
9
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 3--valve plus coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.胸外科医师协会2008年心脏手术风险模型:第3部分——瓣膜置换加冠状动脉搭桥手术
Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Jul;88(1 Suppl):S43-62. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.05.055.
10
Performance of the AusSCORE II and STS Score for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in a New Zealand Population.新西兰人群中冠状动脉旁路移植术的AusSCORE II和STS评分表现
Heart Lung Circ. 2021 Apr;30(4):600-604. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2020.08.021. Epub 2020 Oct 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Toward Dynamic Risk Prediction of Outcomes After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft: Improving Risk Prediction With Intraoperative Events Using Gradient Boosting.基于术中事件的梯度提升算法实现冠状动脉旁路移植术后结局的动态风险预测:改善风险预测。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2021 Jun;14(6):e007363. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.007363. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
2
Prediction of the development of acute kidney injury following cardiac surgery by machine learning.机器学习预测心脏手术后急性肾损伤的发生。
Crit Care. 2020 Jul 31;24(1):478. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03179-9.
3
Improved predictive models for acute kidney injury with IDEA: Intraoperative Data Embedded Analytics.
利用 IDEA(术中数据嵌入式分析)改进急性肾损伤的预测模型。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 4;14(4):e0214904. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214904. eCollection 2019.
4
Current Society of Thoracic Surgeons Model Reclassifies Mortality Risk in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.现行胸外科医师学会模型重新分类经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者的死亡率风险。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Sep;11(9):e006664. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.006664.
5
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2018 Adult Cardiac Surgery Risk Models: Part 2-Statistical Methods and Results.胸外科医师学会 2018 年成人心脏外科学风险模型:第 2 部分-统计方法和结果。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 May;105(5):1419-1428. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.03.003. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
6
Outcomes and predictors of prolonged ventilation in patients undergoing elective coronary surgery.择期冠状动脉手术患者长时间通气的结局及预测因素
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012 Jul;15(1):51-6. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivs076. Epub 2012 Apr 11.
7
Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent.基于坐标下降法的广义线性模型正则化路径
J Stat Softw. 2010;33(1):1-22.
8
Risk factors for prolonged ventilation after cardiac surgery using APACHE II, SAPS II, and TISS: comparison of three different models.使用急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)、简化急性生理学评分系统II(SAPS II)和治疗干预评分系统(TISS)评估心脏手术后机械通气时间延长的危险因素:三种不同模型的比较
Intensive Care Med. 2001 Feb;27(2):407-15. doi: 10.1007/s001340000802.