Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (T.M.W., M.S.T, S.N.H., M.F.E., M.R.B., A.L., M.S., P.J.M.B., C.S.R.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics (B.R.L.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Sep;11(9):e006772. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.006772.
Risks and mechanisms of extension of conservatively managed spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) remain incompletely understood. Study objectives were to (1) evaluate mechanisms of early SCAD evolution through serial angiographic analysis, and (2) determine predictors of early SCAD progression.
Retrospective registry study of patients with SCAD managed with an initial conservative strategy (n=240). Patients who experienced significant SCAD progression within 14 days, defined as clinical worsening plus new critical coronary obstruction on repeat angiography, were compared with remaining controls. A total of 42 of 240 (17.5%) experienced significant SCAD progression after index conservative approach; 91% by day 6. Isolated intramural hematoma (IMH) at baseline (no intimal dissection) was observed more frequently in those experiencing progression compared with controls (69.1% versus 44.4%; P=0.004). Multivariable predictors of SCAD progression included lesion severity, multivessel involvement, and isolated IMH. To investigate mechanisms of SCAD evolution, all repeat angiograms ≤14 days were compared with corresponding baselines (n=82 patient angiogram pairs). Of those with isolated IMH at baseline, 20% developed intimal dissection at repeat study. IMH was associated with greater longitudinal lesion extension (11.5 versus 2.8 mm; P=0.01), worsening Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow (-0.8 versus 0.1; P=0.003), and a nonsignificant lower rate of angiographic improvement (20.0% versus 31.3%; P=0.16) compared with the group with baseline intimal dissection. Optical coherence tomography subgroup analysis (n=17) indicated intimo-medial thickness to be lowest at the midpoint of IMH.
Conservatively managed SCAD carries a 1:6 hazard for serious deterioration within 6 days. The risk was higher in those with isolated IMH at baseline. IMH often precedes development of intimal dissection, which has implications for mechanisms of SCAD.
保守治疗自发性冠状动脉夹层(SCAD)扩展的风险和机制仍不完全清楚。研究目的是:(1)通过连续血管造影分析评估早期 SCAD 演变的机制,(2)确定早期 SCAD 进展的预测因素。
对 240 例接受初始保守策略治疗的 SCAD 患者进行回顾性登记研究。将在 14 天内发生明显 SCAD 进展的患者(定义为临床恶化加上重复血管造影显示新的临界冠状动脉阻塞)与其余对照组进行比较。在指数保守治疗后,共有 240 例患者中的 42 例(17.5%)经历了明显的 SCAD 进展;91%发生在第 6 天。与对照组相比,进展患者中更常观察到基线时(无内膜夹层)的单纯壁内血肿(IMH)(69.1%比 44.4%;P=0.004)。SCAD 进展的多变量预测因素包括病变严重程度、多血管受累和单纯 IMH。为了研究 SCAD 演变的机制,比较了所有≤14 天的重复血管造影与相应的基线(n=82 例患者的血管造影对)。在基线时有单纯 IMH 的患者中,20%在重复研究中出现内膜夹层。与基线时有内膜夹层的患者相比,IMH 与更大的纵向病变延伸(11.5 毫米比 2.8 毫米;P=0.01)、心肌梗死溶栓血流恶化(-0.8 比 0.1;P=0.003)和血管造影改善率较低(20.0%比 31.3%;P=0.16)相关。光学相干断层扫描亚组分析(n=17)表明,IMH 的中间点的内中膜厚度最低。
保守治疗的 SCAD 在 6 天内严重恶化的风险为 1:6。在基线时单纯 IMH 的患者中风险更高。IMH 常先于内膜夹层的发生,这对 SCAD 的发病机制有影响。