• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国食品药品监督管理局科学与工程实验室办公室利用计算模型推动医疗器械监管科学发展。

Advancing Regulatory Science With Computational Modeling for Medical Devices at the FDA's Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories.

作者信息

Morrison Tina M, Pathmanathan Pras, Adwan Mariam, Margerrison Edward

机构信息

Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, United States.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2018 Sep 25;5:241. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00241. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.3389/fmed.2018.00241
PMID:30356350
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6167449/
Abstract

Protecting and promoting public health is the mission of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). FDA's Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH), which regulates medical devices marketed in the U.S., envisions itself as the world's leader in medical device innovation and regulatory science-the development of new methods, standards, and approaches to assess the safety, efficacy, quality, and performance of medical devices. Traditionally, bench testing, animal studies, and clinical trials have been the main sources of evidence for getting medical devices on the market in the U.S. In recent years, however, computational modeling has become an increasingly powerful tool for evaluating medical devices, complementing bench, animal and clinical methods. Moreover, computational modeling methods are increasingly being used within software platforms, serving as clinical decision support tools, and are being embedded in medical devices. Because of its reach and huge potential, computational modeling has been identified as a priority by CDRH, and indeed by FDA's leadership. Therefore, the Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories (OSEL)-the research arm of CDRH-has committed significant resources to transforming computational modeling from a valuable scientific tool to a valuable regulatory tool, and developing mechanisms to rely more on digital evidence in place of other evidence. This article introduces the role of computational modeling for medical devices, describes OSEL's ongoing research, and overviews how evidence from computational modeling (i.e., digital evidence) has been used in regulatory submissions by industry to CDRH in recent years. It concludes by discussing the potential future role for computational modeling and digital evidence in medical devices.

摘要

保护和促进公众健康是美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的使命。FDA的器械与放射健康中心(CDRH)负责监管在美国市场销售的医疗器械,其目标是成为全球医疗器械创新和监管科学领域的领导者——开发用于评估医疗器械安全性、有效性、质量和性能的新方法、标准和途径。传统上,台架测试、动物研究和临床试验一直是美国医疗器械上市的主要证据来源。然而,近年来,计算建模已成为评估医疗器械的一种越来越强大的工具,对台架、动物和临床方法起到了补充作用。此外,计算建模方法越来越多地应用于软件平台,用作临床决策支持工具,并被嵌入到医疗器械中。由于其影响力和巨大潜力,计算建模已被CDRH乃至FDA领导层确定为优先事项。因此,CDRH的科研部门——科学与工程实验室办公室(OSEL)已投入大量资源,将计算建模从一种有价值的科学工具转变为一种有价值的监管工具,并建立更多依赖数字证据而非其他证据的机制。本文介绍了计算建模在医疗器械方面的作用,描述了OSEL正在进行的研究,并概述了近年来计算建模证据(即数字证据)在行业向CDRH提交的监管申报材料中的使用情况。文章最后讨论了计算建模和数字证据在医疗器械领域未来可能发挥的作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/471f/6167449/c615f3f8e415/fmed-05-00241-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/471f/6167449/c615f3f8e415/fmed-05-00241-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/471f/6167449/c615f3f8e415/fmed-05-00241-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Advancing Regulatory Science With Computational Modeling for Medical Devices at the FDA's Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories.美国食品药品监督管理局科学与工程实验室办公室利用计算模型推动医疗器械监管科学发展。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2018 Sep 25;5:241. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00241. eCollection 2018.
2
Qualification of a non-animal vaginal irritation method admitted as nonclinical assessment model (NAM) in the Incubator Phase of the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) Medical Devices Development Tool (MDDT).一种非动物阴道刺激方法的资格认定,被美国食品和药物管理局(US FDA)医疗器械开发工具(MDDT)的孵化阶段接纳为非临床评估模型(NAM)。
Toxicol In Vitro. 2020 Feb;62:104680. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2019.104680. Epub 2019 Oct 15.
3
FDA use of international standards in the premarket review process.美国食品药品监督管理局在上市前审查过程中对国际标准的使用。
Biomed Instrum Technol. 1998 Sep-Oct;32(5):518-26.
4
FDA regulation of invasive neural recording electrodes: a daunting task for medical innovators.美国食品药品监督管理局对侵入性神经记录电极的监管:对医学创新者来说是一项艰巨的任务。
IEEE Pulse. 2012 Mar;3(2):37-41. doi: 10.1109/MPUL.2011.2181022.
5
Advancing regulatory science to bring novel medical devices for use in emergency care to market: the role of the Food and Drug Administration.推动监管科学发展,将用于急救护理的新型医疗设备推向市场:美国食品药品监督管理局的作用。
Ann Emerg Med. 2015 Apr;65(4):400-3. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.07.008. Epub 2014 Aug 13.
6
Thirty-five Years of Reporting of Sex and Race in Clinical Studies of U.S. FDA-Authorized Orthopaedic Devices.35 年来美国 FDA 批准的骨科器械临床研究中报告的性别和种族差异。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2024 Nov 6;106(21):2009-2016. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.24.00201. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
7
FDA's perspectives on cardiovascular devices.FDA 对心血管器械的看法。
J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2009 Jun;2(2):143-6. doi: 10.1007/s12265-009-9096-7. Epub 2009 Mar 10.
8
Translating New Science Into the Drug Review Process: The US FDA's Division of Applied Regulatory Science.将新科学转化为药品审评流程:美国食品药品监督管理局应用监管科学司
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2018 Mar;52(2):244-255. doi: 10.1177/2168479017720249. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
9
Measuring Patient Preferences at the FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health: Reflections and Projections.在 FDA 设备和放射健康中心测量患者偏好:反思与展望。
Value Health. 2021 Jul;24(7):1024-1029. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.01.009. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
10
The new collaborative path in medical device development: the medical device innovation consortium.医疗器械开发的新合作途径:医疗器械创新联盟。
Clin Biochem. 2013 Oct;46(15):1320-2. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2013.03.021. Epub 2013 Apr 8.

引用本文的文献

1
The computational model lifecycle: Opportunities and challenges for computational medicine in the healthcare ecosystem.计算模型生命周期:医疗保健生态系统中计算医学面临的机遇与挑战。
Sci Prog. 2025 Jul-Sep;108(3):368504251344145. doi: 10.1177/00368504251344145. Epub 2025 Sep 1.
2
Digital Twin Models in Atrial Fibrillation: Charting the Future of Precision Therapy?心房颤动中的数字孪生模型:描绘精准治疗的未来?
J Pers Med. 2025 Jun 16;15(6):256. doi: 10.3390/jpm15060256.
3
Challenges and opportunities in uncertainty quantification for healthcare and biological systems.

本文引用的文献

1
A test method to assess the contribution of fluid shear stress to the cleaning of reusable device surfaces.一种评估流体切向应力对可重复使用器械表面清洁贡献的测试方法。
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2019 May;107(4):1132-1140. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.34206. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
2
Control-oriented physiological modeling of hemodynamic responses to blood volume perturbation.面向控制的血容量扰动血流动力学反应的生理建模
Control Eng Pract. 2018 Apr;73(April 2018):149-160. doi: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2018.01.008. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
3
Predicting Plasma Free Hemoglobin Levels in Patients Due to Medical Device-Related Hemolysis.
医疗保健和生物系统不确定性量化中的挑战与机遇。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2025 Mar 13;383(2292):20240232. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2024.0232.
4
Defining myocardial fiber bundle architecture in atrial digital twins.定义心房数字孪生模型中的心肌纤维束结构
Comput Biol Med. 2025 Apr;188:109774. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.109774. Epub 2025 Feb 12.
5
Digital Representation of Patients as Medical Digital Twins: Data-Centric Viewpoint.作为医学数字孪生的患者数字表示:以数据为中心的观点。
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 Jan 28;13:e53542. doi: 10.2196/53542.
6
Mechanisms of aortic dissection: From pathological changes to experimental and models.主动脉夹层的机制:从病理变化到实验与模型
Prog Mater Sci. 2025 Apr;150. doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2024.101363. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
7
Survey and perspective on verification, validation, and uncertainty quantification of digital twins for precision medicine.精准医学中数字孪生体的验证、确认及不确定性量化的综述与展望
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Jan 17;8(1):40. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01447-y.
8
Computer-generated Clinical Decision-making in the Treatment of Pulmonary Atresia with Intact Ventricular Septum.计算机辅助临床决策在室间隔完整型肺动脉闭锁治疗中的应用
Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2025 Apr;16(2):222-237. doi: 10.1007/s13239-024-00769-4. Epub 2024 Dec 20.
9
From bits to bedside: entering the age of digital twins in cardiac electrophysiology.从比特到床边:心脏电生理学进入数字孪生时代。
Europace. 2024 Dec 3;26(12). doi: 10.1093/europace/euae295.
10
Computational modeling of autonomic nerve stimulation: Vagus et al.自主神经刺激的计算建模:迷走神经等
Curr Opin Biomed Eng. 2024 Dec;32. doi: 10.1016/j.cobme.2024.100557. Epub 2024 Aug 24.
预测与医疗器械相关溶血性贫血患者的血浆游离血红蛋白水平。
ASAIO J. 2019 Mar/Apr;65(3):207-218. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000801.
4
Realistic modeling of deep brain stimulation implants for electromagnetic MRI safety studies.用于电磁 MRI 安全研究的深部脑刺激植入物的逼真建模。
Phys Med Biol. 2018 May 4;63(9):095015. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aabd50.
5
Patient-Specific Cardiovascular Computational Modeling: Diversity of Personalization and Challenges.患者特异性心血管计算建模:个性化的多样性和挑战。
J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2018 Apr;11(2):80-88. doi: 10.1007/s12265-018-9792-2. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
6
Validation and Trustworthiness of Multiscale Models of Cardiac Electrophysiology.心脏电生理学多尺度模型的验证与可信度
Front Physiol. 2018 Feb 15;9:106. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00106. eCollection 2018.
7
The Role of Computational Modeling and Simulation in the Total Product Life Cycle of Peripheral Vascular Devices.计算建模与仿真在周围血管装置全产品生命周期中的作用
J Med Device. 2017;11(2). doi: 10.1115/1.4035866. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
8
RF Safety Evaluation of a Breast Tissue Expander Device for MRI: Numerical Simulation and Experiment.用于磁共振成像的乳房组织扩张器设备的射频安全性评估:数值模拟与实验
IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat. 2017 Oct;59(5):1390-1399. doi: 10.1109/TEMC.2017.2678201.
9
Predicting patient exposure to nickel released from cardiovascular devices using multi-scale modeling.使用多尺度建模预测心血管设备释放的镍对患者的暴露情况。
Acta Biomater. 2018 Apr 1;70:304-314. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.01.024. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
10
Validating Fatigue Safety Factor Calculation Methods for Cardiovascular Stents.验证心血管支架疲劳安全系数计算方法
J Biomech Eng. 2018 Jun 1;140(6). doi: 10.1115/1.4039173.