Exercise is recreation not medicine.

PURPOSE

This paper responds to the question, is exercise medicine? It does so using a qualitative case study that proposes that . The study (1) describes and reflects upon an metaphor, (2) establishes the principles and processes used to develop a sport park within which , and (3) presents a comparative analysis of the approach with a UK quality framework for "exercise referrals".

METHODS

Four years of documentation were collated and placed into 14 categories: (1) university strategies, (2) plans of the site, (3) policy documents, (4) minutes of a steering group, (5) contemporary documents, (6) organisational charts, (7) responses to local government policies on sport, (8) consultation documents, (9) operational procedures, (10) facility specifications, (11) partnership agreements, (12) material relating to the university's work on events, (13) notes on the universities sport department, and (14) timetables. These data were analysed through a 4-stage process which used recreation as the analytical theme for a comparative analysis.

RESULTS

The characteristics of the metaphor in this case are (1) a focus on the experience of the user, (2) the promotion of well-being, (3) the importance of community, (4) embracing inclusivity, (5) sport, (6) aesthetics, and (7) leisure time. The principles and processes used to develop the sport park were (1) custodianship, (2) partnerships, (3) values, (4) inter-professional working, (5) local heritage, (6) change, (7) the natural park environment, and (8) "riding the bike as you build it". The comparative analysis with a UK quality framework for "exercise referrals" clearly shows a difference from an approach.

CONCLUSION

Exercise is recreation and may enable individuals and communities to reach a state of well-being.