Suppr超能文献

基于垫和袋的拳击专项训练模式的身体反应。

Physical Response to Pad- and Bag-Based Boxing-Specific Training Modalities.

机构信息

Department of Sport and Physical Activity, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, Lancashire, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2020 Apr;34(4):1052-1061. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002928.

Abstract

Finlay, MJ, Greig, M, McCarthy, J, and Page, RM. Physical response to pad- and bag-based boxing-specific training modalities. J Strength Cond Res 34(4): 1052-1061, 2020-This study examined the differences in the physical response elicited from a contemporary Boxing-Specific Exercise Protocol (BSEP) performed using a punch bag and a pad routine. Fourteen male elite amateur boxers (age = 22 ± 2 years; height = 176.9 ± 7.3 cm; body mass = 78.8 ± 8.7 kg; and V[Combining Dot Above]O2max = 55.94 ± 5.96 ml·kg·min) were recruited. The BSEP comprised 3 × 3-minute rounds. Average (HRave) and peak (HRpeak) heart rate, average (V[Combining Dot Above]O2ave) and peak oxygen consumption (V[Combining Dot Above]O2peak), blood lactate (BLa) concentrations, rating of perceived exertion (RPE), and both triaxial and uniaxial PlayerLoad metrics were recorded during each trial. The PlayerLoad metrics were recorded at both the cervical and lumbar spine. BLa increased significantly across rounds, with higher values recorded in the pad trial (pad = 2.7 ± 0.8 mmol·L; bag = 2.3 ± 0.9 mmol·L). A similar response was also identified for the HRave (pad = 160 ± 9 b·min; bag = 150 ± 16 b·min) and V[Combining Dot Above]O2ave data (pad = 38.00 ± 0.31 ml·kg·min; bag = 34.40 ± 1.06 ml·kg·min). A significant main effect for time was also recorded for the RPE data; however, there were no significant differences between trials. Conversely, the triaxial (PLTotal) and medial-lateral (PLML) data were higher in the punch bag trial. There was also a main effect for time for all the PlayerLoad metrics. PLTotal, PLML, and vertical PlayerLoad were significantly higher in the lumbar region when compared with the cervical region. With implications for boxing-specific conditioning, the pad routine was more physiologically demanding, but less mechanically demanding than the bag routine.

摘要

芬利、MJ、格里格、M、麦卡锡和佩奇,RM。基于垫和袋的拳击专项训练模式的身体反应。《力量与调节研究杂志》34(4):1052-1061,2020 年——本研究比较了使用拳击专项练习(BSEP)中打沙袋和打垫的两种不同方法所产生的身体反应的差异。14 名男性精英业余拳击手(年龄=22±2 岁;身高=176.9±7.3cm;体重=78.8±8.7kg;最大摄氧量=55.94±5.96ml·kg·min)被招募。BSEP 由 3 个 3 分钟的回合组成。平均心率(HRave)和峰值心率(HRpeak)、平均耗氧量(V[Combining Dot Above]O2ave)和峰值耗氧量(V[Combining Dot Above]O2peak)、血乳酸(BLa)浓度、感知用力程度(RPE)以及三轴和单轴 PlayerLoad 指标均在每次试验中进行记录。PlayerLoad 指标分别在颈椎和腰椎进行记录。BLa 在各回合中显著增加,垫组的 BLa 更高(垫=2.7±0.8mmol·L;袋=2.3±0.9mmol·L)。HRave(垫=160±9b·min;袋=150±16b·min)和 V[Combining Dot Above]O2ave 数据(垫=38.00±0.31ml·kg·min;袋=34.40±1.06ml·kg·min)也有类似的反应。RPE 数据也记录到显著的时间主效应;但是,试验之间没有差异。相反,在打沙袋的试验中三轴(PLTotal)和内侧-外侧(PLML)数据更高。所有 PlayerLoad 指标的时间主效应也有记录。与颈椎相比,腰椎的 PTLotal、PLML 和垂直 PlayerLoad 更高。PLTotal、PLML 和垂直 PlayerLoad 在腰椎区比在颈椎区显著更高。这对拳击专项训练有影响,打垫的方式在生理上要求更高,但在机械上要求较低。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验