• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改进试验招募流程:如何使用定性方法解决 PRioRiTy 研究中确定的前 10 项研究重点。

Improving trial recruitment processes: how qualitative methodologies can be used to address the top 10 research priorities identified within the PRioRiTy study.

机构信息

Qualitative Research in Trials Centre (QUESTS), School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.

Health Behaviour Change Research Group, School of Psychology, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.

出版信息

Trials. 2018 Oct 25;19(1):584. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2964-1.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-018-2964-1
PMID:30359293
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6202834/
Abstract

How can we improve recruitment to trials? In their recently published paper, Healy et al. outline the top 10 prioritised questions for trial recruitment research identified by the PRioRiTy study. The challenge now is for researchers to answer these questions; but how best can these be answered? In this commentary, we illustrate how qualitative research can be utilised to generate in-depth insight into trial recruitment issues, either as a stand-alone methodology, or through a mixed-methods approach. Consideration is given to how different forms of qualitative research can be used to address these priorities and to help researchers set out an agenda to optimise its value.

摘要

我们如何才能提高试验的招募效果?在他们最近发表的论文中,Healy 等人概述了由 PRioRiTy 研究确定的临床试验招募研究中最优先考虑的 10 个问题。现在的挑战是研究人员如何回答这些问题;但如何才能最好地回答这些问题呢?在这篇评论中,我们举例说明了定性研究如何能够被用于深入了解试验招募问题,无论是作为一种独立的方法,还是通过混合方法的途径。我们考虑了如何使用不同形式的定性研究来解决这些优先事项,并帮助研究人员制定一个优化其价值的议程。

相似文献

1
Improving trial recruitment processes: how qualitative methodologies can be used to address the top 10 research priorities identified within the PRioRiTy study.改进试验招募流程:如何使用定性方法解决 PRioRiTy 研究中确定的前 10 项研究重点。
Trials. 2018 Oct 25;19(1):584. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2964-1.
2
The AMBER care bundle for hospital inpatients with uncertain recovery nearing the end of life: the ImproveCare feasibility cluster RCT.AMBER 关怀包用于生命末期临近、康复情况不确定的住院患者:改善关怀可行性群组 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Oct;23(55):1-150. doi: 10.3310/hta23550.
3
A simple technique to identify key recruitment issues in randomised controlled trials: Q-QAT - Quanti-Qualitative Appointment Timing.一种识别随机对照试验中关键招募问题的简单技术:Q-QAT——定量-定性预约时间法。
Trials. 2015 Mar 11;16:88. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0617-1.
4
Understanding and Improving Recruitment to Randomised Controlled Trials: Qualitative Research Approaches.理解和改进随机对照试验的招募:定性研究方法。
Eur Urol. 2017 Nov;72(5):789-798. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.036. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
5
Qualitative research to improve RCT recruitment: issues arising in establishing research collaborations.改善随机对照试验招募的定性研究:建立研究合作中出现的问题
Contemp Clin Trials. 2008 Sep;29(5):663-70. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2008.03.003. Epub 2008 Mar 18.
6
'The trial is owned by the team, not by an individual': a qualitative study exploring the role of teamwork in recruitment to randomised controlled trials in surgical oncology.“试验由团队主导,而非个人”:一项定性研究,探讨团队合作在外科肿瘤学随机对照试验招募工作中的作用
Trials. 2016 Apr 26;17(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1341-1.
7
Embedding qualitative research in randomised controlled trials to improve recruitment: findings from two recruitment optimisation studies of orthopaedic surgical trials.将定性研究嵌入随机对照试验以提高招募效果:两项骨科手术试验招募优化研究的结果。
Trials. 2021 Jul 17;22(1):461. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05420-4.
8
A secondary qualitative analysis of stakeholder views about participant recruitment, retention, and adherence in decentralised clinical trials (DCTs).关于去中心化临床试验(DCTs)中参与者招募、保留和依从性的利益相关者观点的二次定性分析。
Trials. 2022 Jul 30;23(1):614. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06521-4.
9
Intensive Triangulation of Qualitative Research and Quantitative Data to Improve Recruitment to Randomized Trials: The QuinteT Approach.定性研究和定量数据的密集三角测量提高随机试验招募效果:QuinteT 方法。
Qual Health Res. 2019 Apr;29(5):672-679. doi: 10.1177/1049732319828693. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
10
Maximising recruitment to a randomised controlled trial for chronic rhinosinusitis using qualitative research methods: the MACRO conversation study.采用定性研究方法提高慢性鼻-鼻窦炎随机对照试验的招募率:MACRO 对话研究。
Trials. 2021 Jan 13;22(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04993-w.

引用本文的文献

1
Why do patients take part in research? An updated overview of systematic reviews of psychosocial barriers and facilitators.患者为何参与研究?心理社会障碍与促进因素的系统评价最新综述。
Trials. 2025 May 27;26(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08850-6.
2
Understanding Barriers and Facilitators for Ethnic Minority Groups to Audio Recording Recruitment Discussions in Clinical Trials: A Participatory Approach to Improving Informed Consent and Participation.了解临床试验中少数族裔群体进行招募讨论录音的障碍与促进因素:一种改善知情同意和参与的参与式方法。
Health Expect. 2025 Apr;28(2):e70210. doi: 10.1111/hex.70210.
3
Factors that influence recruitment to COVID-19 vaccine trials: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响新冠疫苗试验招募工作的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Trials. 2024 Dec 19;25(1):837. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08670-0.
4
Integrating qualitative research within a clinical trials unit: developing strategies and understanding their implementation in contexts.将定性研究纳入临床试验单位:制定策略并了解其在不同背景下的实施情况。
Trials. 2024 May 16;25(1):323. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08124-7.
5
Qualitative data sharing practices in clinical trials in the UK and Ireland: towards the production of good practice guidance.英国和爱尔兰临床试验中的定性数据共享实践:迈向良好实践指南的制定
HRB Open Res. 2023 Feb 6;6:10. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13667.1. eCollection 2023.
6
Protocol Development for a Qualitative Methodological Study Within a Trial (Qual-SWAT): The KARMA-Dep-2 Trial.试验中定性方法学研究的方案制定(定性-试验协作组研究方法):KARMA-Dep-2试验
HRB Open Res. 2023 Nov 20;6:29. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13721.2. eCollection 2023.
7
Experiences of and recommendations on clinical trial design in Alzheimer's disease from the participant's point of view: a mixed-methods study in two clinical trial centers in the Netherlands.从参与者的角度出发,对阿尔茨海默病临床试验设计的经验和建议:荷兰两个临床试验中心的混合方法研究。
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2023 Apr 4;15(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s13195-023-01190-0.
8
Factors influencing participation in randomised clinical trials among patients with early Barrett's neoplasia: a multicentre interview study.影响早期 Barrett 肿瘤患者参与随机临床试验的因素:一项多中心访谈研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jan 6;13(1):e064117. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064117.
9
Virtual conversational agents versus online forms: Patient experience and preferences for health data collection.虚拟对话代理与在线表单:患者对健康数据收集的体验和偏好
Front Digit Health. 2022 Oct 13;4:954069. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.954069. eCollection 2022.
10
Understanding the perspectives of recruiters is key to improving randomised controlled trial enrolment: a qualitative evidence synthesis.了解招聘人员的观点是提高随机对照试验入组率的关键:一项定性证据综合研究。
Trials. 2022 Oct 20;23(1):883. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06818-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Factors that impact on recruitment to randomised trials in health care: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响医疗保健领域随机试验招募的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 7;10(10):MR000045. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000045.pub2.
2
Identifying trial recruitment uncertainties using a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership - the PRioRiTy (Prioritising Recruitment in Randomised Trials) study.利用詹姆斯·林德联盟优先事项设定合作项目确定试验招募的不确定性——PRioRiTy(随机试验中的招募优先排序)研究
Trials. 2018 Mar 1;19(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2544-4.
3
Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings: introduction to the series.应用 GRADE-CERQual 对定性证据综合研究结果进行评估:简介系列。
Implement Sci. 2018 Jan 25;13(Suppl 1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0688-3.
4
Process evaluation for OptiBIRTH, a randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention designed to increase rates of vaginal birth after caesarean section.对OptiBIRTH进行过程评估,OptiBIRTH是一项旨在提高剖宫产术后阴道分娩率的复杂干预措施的随机对照试验。
Trials. 2018 Jan 5;19(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2401-x.
5
Optimising recruitment and informed consent in randomised controlled trials: the development and implementation of the Quintet Recruitment Intervention (QRI).优化随机对照试验中的招募与知情同意:五重奏招募干预措施(QRI)的开发与实施
Trials. 2016 Jun 8;17(1):283. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1391-4.
6
The ethical issues regarding consent to clinical trials with pre-term or sick neonates: a systematic review (framework synthesis) of the empirical research.关于早产儿或患病新生儿临床试验同意书的伦理问题:实证研究的系统评价(框架综合)
Trials. 2015 Nov 4;16:502. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0957-x.
7
Participant views and experiences of participating in HIV research in sub-Saharan Africa: a qualitative systematic review.撒哈拉以南非洲地区参与者对参与艾滋病病毒研究的看法和经历:一项定性系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jun 12;13(5):330-420. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2051.
8
Conducting qualitative research within Clinical Trials Units: avoiding potential pitfalls.在临床试验单位开展定性研究:避免潜在陷阱。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2014 Jul;38(2):338-43. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2014.06.002. Epub 2014 Jun 14.
9
Getting added value from using qualitative research with randomized controlled trials: a qualitative interview study.通过将定性研究与随机对照试验相结合获取附加价值:一项定性访谈研究。
Trials. 2014 Jun 9;15:215. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-215.
10
Clear obstacles and hidden challenges: understanding recruiter perspectives in six pragmatic randomised controlled trials.清除障碍与潜在挑战:在六项实用随机对照试验中理解招聘人员的观点
Trials. 2014 Jan 6;15:5. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-5.