Li Xiaoshu, Li Xiaohu, Chen Shujuan, Zhu Jiajia, Wang Haibao, Tian Yanghua, Yu Yongqiang
Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, No.218 Jixi Road, Hefei, 230022, Anhui, China.
Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Brain Imaging Behav. 2020 Feb;14(1):119-129. doi: 10.1007/s11682-018-9975-0.
Emotional enhancement of memory (EEM) is thought to modulate memory recollection rather than familiarity. However, the contributing factors and neural mechanisms are not well understood. To address these issues, we investigated how valence, arousal, and the amount of devoted attention influence the EEM effect on recollection. We also compared the topological properties among hippocampus- and perirhinal and entorhinal cortex-mediated emotional memory processing networks. Finally, we evaluated the correlations between emotional memory/EEM and inherent properties (i.e., amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation and node degree, efficiency, and betweenness) of the hippocampus and perirhinal and entorhinal cortices in 59 healthy young adults by resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. EEM was elicited by incidental encoding, negative images, and positive high-arousal images. The hippocampus was correlated with recollection sensitivity and EEM. The emotional memory processing network mediated by the hippocampus had higher clustering coefficient, local efficiency, and normalized characteristic path length but lower normalized global efficiency than those mediated by the perirhinal and entorhinal cortices. The entorhinal cortex was associated with both recollection and familiarity sensitivity, but showed different correlation patterns. The perirhinal cortex was highly correlated with familiarity sensitivity of negative low-arousal stimuli. These results demonstrate that the EEM effect on memory recollection is influenced by valence, stimulus arousal, and amount of attention involved during encoding. Moreover, the hippocampus and perirhinal and entorhinal cortices play distinct roles in the recollection and familiarity of emotional memory and the EEM effect.
情绪增强记忆(EEM)被认为是调节记忆回忆而非熟悉度。然而,其影响因素和神经机制尚未得到充分理解。为了解决这些问题,我们研究了效价、唤醒度以及投入的注意力程度如何影响EEM对回忆的作用。我们还比较了海马体、内嗅皮层和鼻周皮层介导的情绪记忆处理网络之间的拓扑特性。最后,我们通过静息态功能磁共振成像评估了59名健康年轻成年人中海马体、内嗅皮层和鼻周皮层的情绪记忆/EEM与固有属性(即低频波动幅度、节点度、效率和中介中心性)之间的相关性。EEM通过偶发编码、负面图像和正面高唤醒图像诱发。海马体与回忆敏感性和EEM相关。由海马体介导的情绪记忆处理网络比由内嗅皮层和鼻周皮层介导的网络具有更高的聚类系数、局部效率和标准化特征路径长度,但标准化全局效率更低。内嗅皮层与回忆和熟悉度敏感性均相关,但呈现出不同的相关模式。鼻周皮层与负性低唤醒刺激的熟悉度敏感性高度相关。这些结果表明,EEM对记忆回忆的影响受效价、刺激唤醒度以及编码过程中涉及的注意力程度的影响。此外,海马体、内嗅皮层和鼻周皮层在情绪记忆的回忆和熟悉度以及EEM效应中发挥着不同的作用。