• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年和九十岁以上患者行腹腔镜胰体尾切除术的手术结局:一项单中心的对比研究。

Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy in elderly and octogenarian patients: a single-center, comparative study.

机构信息

Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, 3 East Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310016, Zhejiang, China.

Department of Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, 158 Shangtang Road, Hangzhou, 310014, Zhejiang, China.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2019 Jul;33(7):2142-2151. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6489-1. Epub 2018 Oct 25.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-018-6489-1
PMID:30361968
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although recent reports have suggested the advantages of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP), the potential benefits of this approach in elderly patients remain unclear. The aim of this study was to clarify the value of LDP in the elderly, in whom co-morbid diseases were generally more common.

METHODS

Seventy elderly patients (≥ 70 years) and 264 non-elderly patients (40-69 years) who underwent LDP, and 48 elderly patients (≥ 70 years) who underwent open distal pancreatectomy (ODP) between May 2005 and May 2018 were studied. Demographics, intraoperative, and postoperative outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

Comorbidity was more common in elderly patients than in non-elderly patients who underwent LDP (57.1 vs. 38.3%, p < 0.01). The intraoperative factors, postoperative complication rate, and length of hospital stay were comparable in these two groups. Elderly patients who underwent LDP had a significantly shorter operative time (185.5 vs. 208.0 min, p = 0.02), less blood loss (191.0 vs. 291.8 mL, p < 0.01), and reduced length of postoperative hospital stay (11.4 vs. 15.1 days, p < 0.01) than elderly patients who had ODP. The overall complication rate tended to be lower in LDP group than that in ODP group (20.0 vs. 33.3%, p = 0.07).

CONCLUSION

LDP performed on the elderly is safe and feasible, leading to short-term outcomes similar to those of non-elderly patients. LDP could be an alternative to ODP in elderly patients, providing a lower rate of morbidity and favorable postoperative recovery and outcomes.

摘要

背景

尽管最近的报道表明腹腔镜胰体尾切除术(LDP)具有优势,但这种方法在老年患者中的潜在益处尚不清楚。本研究旨在阐明 LDP 在合并症更为常见的老年患者中的价值。

方法

研究纳入了 2005 年 5 月至 2018 年 5 月期间接受 LDP 的 70 例老年患者(≥70 岁)和 264 例非老年患者(40-69 岁),以及 48 例接受开腹胰体尾切除术(ODP)的老年患者(≥70 岁)。比较了这些患者的人口统计学、术中及术后结果。

结果

与接受 LDP 的非老年患者相比,老年患者的合并症更为常见(57.1%比 38.3%,p<0.01)。这两组患者的术中因素、术后并发症发生率和住院时间无显著差异。接受 LDP 的老年患者的手术时间明显更短(185.5 比 208.0 分钟,p=0.02),出血量更少(191.0 比 291.8 毫升,p<0.01),术后住院时间更短(11.4 比 15.1 天,p<0.01),而接受 ODP 的老年患者则相反。LDP 组的总体并发症发生率低于 ODP 组(20.0%比 33.3%,p=0.07)。

结论

对老年患者施行 LDP 是安全可行的,其短期结果与非老年患者相似。LDP 可作为老年患者的 ODP 替代方案,其发病率较低,术后恢复和结局良好。

相似文献

1
Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy in elderly and octogenarian patients: a single-center, comparative study.老年和九十岁以上患者行腹腔镜胰体尾切除术的手术结局:一项单中心的对比研究。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Jul;33(7):2142-2151. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6489-1. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
2
Impact of laparoscopy in patients aged over 70 years requiring distal pancreatectomy: a French multicentric comparative study.腹腔镜在 70 岁以上需行胰体尾切除术患者中的应用:一项法国多中心对比研究。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jul;32(7):3164-3173. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6033-3. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
3
Laparoscopic Versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.腹腔镜与开放远端胰腺切除术治疗胰腺腺癌
World J Surg. 2016 Jun;40(6):1477-84. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3412-6.
4
[Comparison of short-term clinical outcome between laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and open distal pancreatectomy].腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术与开放远端胰腺切除术短期临床结局的比较
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2020 Jun 23;42(6):495-500. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20190627-00398.
5
Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for benign or premalignant pancreatic neoplasms: a two-center comparative study.腹腔镜与开放手术治疗良性或癌前胰腺肿瘤的远端胰腺切除术:一项双中心比较研究。
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2015 Jul;16(7):573-9. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1400257.
6
Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer is safe and effective.腹腔镜胰体尾切除术治疗胰腺癌安全有效。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jan;32(1):53-61. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5633-7. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
7
Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a single-center experience.腹腔镜与开放远端胰腺切除术治疗胰腺导管腺癌:单中心经验
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2017 Jun;18(6):532-538. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1600541.
8
Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a large single-center study.腹腔镜与开腹胰体尾切除术治疗无功能性胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤:一项大型单中心研究。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jan;32(1):443-449. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5702-y. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
9
Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a single-center propensity score matching study.腹腔镜与开放远端胰腺切除术治疗胰腺导管腺癌:一项单中心倾向评分匹配研究
Updates Surg. 2020 Jun;72(2):387-397. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00742-5. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
10
LDP vs ODP for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a case matched study from a single-institution.胰头十二指肠切除术(LDP)与保留幽门的胰十二指肠切除术(ODP)治疗胰腺腺癌:一项来自单一机构的病例匹配研究
BMC Gastroenterol. 2015 Dec 22;15:182. doi: 10.1186/s12876-015-0411-2.

引用本文的文献

1
EAES/SAGES evidence-based recommendations and expert consensus on optimization of perioperative care in older adults.EAES/SAGES 关于优化老年人围手术期护理的循证建议和专家共识。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Aug;38(8):4104-4126. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10977-7. Epub 2024 Jun 28.
2
Distal pancreatectomy with or without radical approach, vascular resections and splenectomy: Easier does not always mean easy.采用或不采用根治性术式的远端胰腺切除术、血管切除术和脾切除术:操作简单并不总是意味着容易。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Jun 27;15(6):1020-1032. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i6.1020.
3
Modified Frailty Index to Assess Risk in Elderly Patients Undergoing Distal Pancreatectomy: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of Operative Time on Outcomes after Pancreatic Resection: A Risk-Adjusted Analysis Using the American College of Surgeons NSQIP Database.手术时间对胰腺切除术后结局的影响:使用美国外科医师学院 NSQIP 数据库的风险调整分析。
J Am Coll Surg. 2018 May;226(5):844-857.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.01.004. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
2
The role of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy in elderly patients.腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术在老年患者中的作用。
Minerva Chir. 2018 Apr;73(2):179-187. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4733.18.07594-6. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
3
Impact of laparoscopy in patients aged over 70 years requiring distal pancreatectomy: a French multicentric comparative study.
改良衰弱指数评估老年患者胰体尾切除术风险:一项回顾性单中心研究。
World J Surg. 2022 Apr;46(4):891-900. doi: 10.1007/s00268-021-06436-2. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
4
Evaluation of factors predicting loss of benefit provided by laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy compared to open approach.评价腹腔镜胰体尾切除术相对于开腹手术优势丧失的预测因素。
Updates Surg. 2022 Feb;74(1):213-221. doi: 10.1007/s13304-021-01194-1. Epub 2021 Oct 23.
5
Laparoscopic versus open pancreatic resection for ductal adenocarcinoma: separate propensity score matching analyses of distal pancreatectomy and pancreaticoduodenectomy.腹腔镜与开腹胰腺切除术治疗导管腺癌:胰体尾切除术和胰十二指肠切除术的独立倾向评分匹配分析。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Apr 9;21(1):382. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08117-8.
6
Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy Following Prior Upper Abdominal Surgery (Pancreatectomy and Prior Surgery).既往上腹部手术后的腹腔镜胰体尾切除术(胰切除术和既往手术)。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Jul;25(7):1787-1794. doi: 10.1007/s11605-020-04858-2. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
7
Comparison of 3 Minimally Invasive Methods Versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.三种微创方法与开腹胰体尾切除术的比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2020 Sep 2;31(1):104-112. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000846.
8
Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy in elderly patients.老年患者的腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术。
Surg Endosc. 2020 May;34(5):2028-2034. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06982-w. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
腹腔镜在 70 岁以上需行胰体尾切除术患者中的应用:一项法国多中心对比研究。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jul;32(7):3164-3173. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6033-3. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
4
Laparoscopic versus open pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜与开腹胰十二指肠切除术治疗胰导管腺癌:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2018 May;53:243-256. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.12.032. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
5
Improving outcomes in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer.改善可切除胰腺癌患者的治疗效果。
Br J Surg. 2017 Oct;104(11):1421-1423. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10692.
6
Calcified pancreatic and peripancreatic neoplasms: spectrum of pathologies.钙化的胰腺和胰周肿瘤:多种病理学表现。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017 Nov;42(11):2686-2697. doi: 10.1007/s00261-017-1182-8.
7
Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a single-center experience.腹腔镜与开放远端胰腺切除术治疗胰腺导管腺癌:单中心经验
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2017 Jun;18(6):532-538. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1600541.
8
The Largest European Single-Center Experience: 300 Laparoscopic Pancreatic Resections.欧洲最大的单中心经验:300例腹腔镜胰腺切除术。
J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Aug;225(2):226-234.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.04.004. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
9
Reduced morbidity with minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.微创远端胰腺切除术治疗胰腺腺癌可降低发病率。
HPB (Oxford). 2017 Mar;19(3):279-285. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2017.01.014. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
10
Laparoscopic Versus Open Liver Resection for Colorectal Metastases in Elderly and Octogenarian Patients: A Multicenter Propensity Score Based Analysis of Short- and Long-term Outcomes.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗老年和八旬老年患者结直肠癌肝转移:基于倾向评分的短期和长期结局的多中心分析。
Ann Surg. 2017 Jun;265(6):1192-1200. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002147.