Suppr超能文献

儿童焦虑障碍筛查在 2 项青少年慢性疼痛研究中的临床参考点。

Clinical Reference Points for the Screen for Child Anxiety-related Disorders in 2 Investigations of Youth With Chronic Pain.

机构信息

Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology.

University of Cincinnati College of Medicine.

出版信息

Clin J Pain. 2019 Mar;35(3):238-246. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000667.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Anxiety is common in pediatric chronic pain and is related to a higher risk for poor outcomes; thus, there is a need for effective clinical screening methods to identify youth with chronic pain and co-occurring anxiety. The Screen for Child Anxiety-related Disorders (SCARED) is a validated measure that defines clinically significant anxiety using the traditional clinical cut-off, but in pain populations, may fail to screen in youth with subclinical anxiety that may also be at increased risk. Two studies aimed to devise a clinically meaningful approach to capture anxiety severity in pediatric chronic pain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study 1 (n=959) and Study 2 (n=207) were completed at 2 separate pediatric pain clinics, where the SCARED was administered along with measures of disability, activity limitations, pain intensity, quality of life, and pain catastrophizing. Groups with different levels of anxiety were compared on clinical outcomes via multivariate analyses of variance or independent samples t tests.

RESULTS

A tertile solution suggested the following anxiety groupings based on the SCARED: minimal (0 to 12), subclinical (13 to 24), and clinical (≥25). Across both studies, the tertile solution was generally superior in classifying different levels of pain-related outcomes.

DISCUSSION

Future directions include testing the utility of this anxiety classification system to identify youth with subclinical levels of anxiety for early intervention focused on both pain and anxiety management.

摘要

目的

焦虑在儿科慢性疼痛中很常见,且与不良预后的风险增加有关;因此,需要有效的临床筛查方法来识别患有慢性疼痛和共病焦虑的青少年。儿童焦虑相关障碍筛查量表(SCARED)是一种经过验证的量表,它使用传统的临床临界值来定义临床上显著的焦虑,但在疼痛人群中,可能无法筛查出有亚临床焦虑的青少年,而这些青少年也可能面临更高的风险。有两项研究旨在设计一种临床上有意义的方法来捕捉儿科慢性疼痛患者的焦虑严重程度。

材料和方法

第一项研究(n=959)和第二项研究(n=207)在 2 个不同的儿科疼痛诊所进行,在这些诊所中,同时进行了 SCARED 量表以及残疾、活动受限、疼痛强度、生活质量和疼痛灾难化的测量。通过多变量方差分析或独立样本 t 检验,对不同焦虑水平的组在临床结果上进行了比较。

结果

基于 SCARED,三分位解决方案建议将焦虑分为以下几个组别:轻度(0 到 12)、亚临床(13 到 24)和临床(≥25)。在两项研究中,三分位解决方案通常更能区分不同水平的与疼痛相关的结果。

讨论

未来的方向包括测试这种焦虑分类系统识别有亚临床水平焦虑的青少年的效用,以便对疼痛和焦虑管理进行早期干预。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4a9/6367022/32160c2676c6/nihms-1509430-f0001.jpg

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验