Department of Nutrition and Movement Sciences, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, THE NETHERLANDS.
Department of Human Physiology and Sports Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, BELGIUM.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019 Mar;51(3):568-574. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001814.
Little data are available on doubly labeled water (DLW) assessed total daily energy expenditure (TDEE) during extreme endurance exercise. Doubly labeled water is considered the gold standard to measure TDEE, but different calculations are being used, which may have a large impact on the results. The aim of the current study was to measure TDEE during the Giro d'Italia and apply two different calculation methods.
Seven male cyclists (age, 28 ± 5 yr; body mass index, 22.1 ± 2.1 kg·m) completed the 24-d professional cycling race "Giro d'Italia" in which a total distance of 3445 km was covered, including 10 mountain stages. Total daily energy expenditure was measured over the entire duration of the race, with the ingestion of DLW at three different time points. To calculate TDEE and body composition, the isotope dilution space was calculated using two different techniques, the "plateau" and "intercept" technique.
The %fat mass at baseline was 7.8% and 16.8% with the plateau and intercept technique respectively and did not significantly change over the course of the race. Total daily energy expenditure was on average 32.3 ± 3.4 MJ·d using the plateau technique versus 28.9 ± 3.2 using the intercept technique, resulting in an average physical activity level (PAL) of 4.37 ± 0.43 versus 3.91 ± 0.39, respectively. The dilution space ratio was on average 1.030 with the plateau and 1.060 with the intercept technique.
Given that the observed dilution space ratio with the plateau technique is similar as the expected ratio from literature and the % fat mass of 7.8% is more realistic for the athletes being studied, we propose the application of the plateau rather than the intercept method, when using DLW during extreme endurance exercise.
在极端耐力运动期间,双标水(DLW)评估的总每日能量消耗(TDEE)的数据很少。双标水被认为是测量 TDEE 的金标准,但目前正在使用不同的计算方法,这可能对结果产生重大影响。本研究的目的是在环意大利自行车赛期间测量 TDEE,并应用两种不同的计算方法。
7 名男性自行车运动员(年龄 28 ± 5 岁;体重指数 22.1 ± 2.1 kg·m)完成了 24 天的职业自行车比赛“环意大利自行车赛”,总距离为 3445 公里,其中包括 10 个山地赛段。在整个比赛期间都测量了总每日能量消耗,并在三个不同时间点摄入 DLW。为了计算 TDEE 和身体成分,使用两种不同的技术,即“平台”和“截距”技术,计算同位素稀释空间。
使用平台和截距技术时,基线时的脂肪质量百分比分别为 7.8%和 16.8%,在比赛过程中没有明显变化。使用平台技术时,TDEE 的平均值为 32.3 ± 3.4 MJ·d,而使用截距技术时为 28.9 ± 3.2 MJ·d,平均体力活动水平(PAL)分别为 4.37 ± 0.43 和 3.91 ± 0.39。平台和截距技术的稀释空间比平均值分别为 1.030 和 1.060。
鉴于使用平台技术观察到的稀释空间比与文献中预期的比例相似,并且研究中的运动员的脂肪质量百分比为 7.8%更为现实,因此我们建议在极端耐力运动期间使用 DLW 时,应用平台技术而不是截距技术。