Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.
Department of Family and Community Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.
Menopause. 2019 Apr;26(4):350-356. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000001255.
The aim of the study was to conduct a pooled analysis of three published trials of nonpharmacological interventions for menopausal hot flashes to compare the effectiveness of interventions.
Data from three randomized controlled trials of interventions for hot flashes (two acupuncture trials, one yoga trial) were pooled. All three studies recruited perimenopausal or postmenopausal women experiencing ≥4 hot flashes/d on average. The primary outcome for all three studies was frequency of hot flashes as measured by the Daily Diary of Hot Flashes. Study 1 participants were randomly assigned to 8 weeks of acupuncture treatments (active intervention), sham acupuncture (attention control), or usual care. Study 2 participants were randomly assigned to 10 weeks of yoga classes, health and wellness education classes (attention control), or waitlist control. Study 3 randomly assigned participants to 6 months of acupuncture or waitlist control. To standardize the time frame for these analyses, only the first 8 weeks of intervention from all three studies were used.
The three active interventions and the two attention control groups had statistically similar trends in the percentage reduction of hot flashes over 8 weeks, ranging from 35% to 40%. These five groups did not differ significantly from each other, but all showed significantly greater reduction in hot flash frequency compared with the three usual care/waitlist groups.
Acupuncture, yoga, and health and wellness education classes all demonstrated statistically similar effectiveness in reduction of hot flash frequency compared with controls.
本研究旨在对三项已发表的非药物干预绝经后潮热的临床试验进行汇总分析,以比较干预措施的有效性。
汇总了三项干预潮热的随机对照试验(两项针灸试验,一项瑜伽试验)的数据。所有三项研究均招募了平均每天经历≥4 次潮热的围绝经期或绝经后妇女。所有三项研究的主要结局均为每日潮热日记中记录的潮热频率。研究 1 的参与者被随机分配接受 8 周的针灸治疗(主动干预)、假针灸(注意对照)或常规护理。研究 2 的参与者被随机分配接受 10 周的瑜伽课程、健康和保健教育课程(注意对照)或候补名单对照。研究 3 随机分配参与者接受 6 个月的针灸或候补名单对照。为了使这些分析的时间框架标准化,仅使用了所有三项研究的前 8 周的干预措施。
三种主动干预措施和两种注意对照组在 8 周内潮热减少的百分比趋势上具有统计学上的相似性,范围在 35%至 40%之间。这五个组彼此之间没有显著差异,但与三个常规护理/候补名单组相比,所有组的潮热频率均显著降低。
针灸、瑜伽和健康与保健教育课程在降低潮热频率方面均显示出与对照组相当的统计学有效性。