Department of Internal Medicine, Dong-A University, Busan, Korea.
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 26;13(10):e0206426. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206426. eCollection 2018.
Guidelines recommend a break-in period of 2 weeks before starting peritoneal dialysis (PD), but PD within 14 days is also an acceptable and safe alternative to hemodialysis (HD) in patients with an urgent need. However, the effect of the break-in period within 48 hours or later had not been evaluated for early technical complications, long-term maintenance, and survival in patients starting urgent PD.
Of 360 patients with a surgically inserted PD catheter, we evaluated 190 patients who needed urgent PD and 29 patients who received conventional PD at a single center between January 2007 and December 2014 in this retrospective observational study. Enrolled patients were divided according to break-in period of <48 hours (P1) or 2-13 days (P2) before starting urgent PD. The primary endpoint was incidence of early technical complications and secondary endpoints included long-term PD maintenance, and patient survival.
PD was started in 103 patients (54.2%) within 48 hours and in 87 patients (45.8%) within 2 to 13 days. The incidence of early technical complication was significantly higher in P1 group (28.2%) than in P2 group (10.3%) (P = 0.002). The need for a repositioning procedure was significantly greater in P1 group (14.6%) than in P2 group (3.4%) (P = 0.009). However, we observed no significant differences between the two groups with respect to the prevalence of catheter dysfunction requiring change to HD within 6 months or incidence of peritonitis or exit-site infection. There was no significant difference in PD maintenance and patient survival according to the break-in period between P1 and P2 as well as against the control group.
Urgent PD was associated with a low incidence of early technical complications if start was avoided within 48 hours after catheter insertion, and long-term PD maintenance was independent of the break-in period.
指南建议在开始腹膜透析(PD)前进行 2 周的适应期,但对于有紧急需求的患者,在 14 天内开始 PD 也是一种可接受且安全的血液透析(HD)替代方案。然而,在开始 PD 后 48 小时内或更晚开始适应期对早期技术并发症、长期维持和生存的影响尚未在开始紧急 PD 的患者中进行评估。
在这项回顾性观察研究中,我们评估了 2007 年 1 月至 2014 年 12 月期间在单一中心接受手术插入 PD 导管的 360 例患者中的 190 例需要紧急 PD 的患者和 29 例接受常规 PD 的患者。根据开始紧急 PD 前 <48 小时(P1)或 2-13 天(P2)的适应期将纳入患者分为两组。主要终点是早期技术并发症的发生率,次要终点包括长期 PD 维持和患者生存。
103 例(54.2%)患者在 48 小时内开始 PD,87 例(45.8%)患者在 2-13 天内开始 PD。P1 组(28.2%)早期技术并发症发生率明显高于 P2 组(10.3%)(P = 0.002)。P1 组需要重新定位的患者比例明显高于 P2 组(14.6%比 3.4%)(P = 0.009)。然而,两组之间在 6 个月内需要更换 HD 的导管功能障碍发生率或腹膜炎或出口部位感染发生率方面没有显著差异。P1 和 P2 之间以及与对照组之间的 PD 维持和患者生存没有显著差异。
如果在导管插入后 48 小时内避免开始紧急 PD,则与早期技术并发症发生率低相关,并且长期 PD 维持与适应期无关。