• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

缺血性心力衰竭患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后残余狭窄的预后影响 - CHART-2 研究报告。

Prognostic impact of residual stenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ischemic heart failure - A report from the CHART-2 study.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.

Department of Evidenced-based Cardiovascular Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2019 Mar 1;278:22-27. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.10.062. Epub 2018 Oct 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.10.062
PMID:30366856
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Complete revascularization with PCI is not always achieved in patients with ischemic HF. Therefore, this study aimed to elucidate the prognostic impact of residual coronary stenosis (RS) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with ischemic heart failure (HF).

METHODS

We analyzed a total of 1307 patients with symptomatic HF and a history of PCI registered in our Chronic Heart Failure Analysis and Registry in the Tohoku District-2 (CHART-2) Study. RS that was defined as the presence of ≥70% luminal stenosis in major coronary arteries at the last coronary angiography.

RESULTS

Among the study population, 851 patients (65.1%) had RS. During a median follow-up period of 3.2 years, patients with RS had higher all-cause mortality than those without it even after propensity score matching (21.9 vs. 11.6%, log-rank P = 0.027). Multivariable Cox hazard analysis also showed the negative impact of RS on all-cause death in ischemic HF patients [hazard ratio (HR):1.62, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.07-2.46, P = 0.024]. Importantly, when divided all subjects into three subgroups by left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) [LVEF < 40% (HFrEF), LVEF 40-49% (HFmrEF), and LVEF ≥ 50% (HFpEF)], inverse probability of treatment weighted method provided a similar result that RS after PCI was an independent risk factor for death in the HFpEF [HR(95%CI); 1.94(1.22-3.09), P < 0.01] and HFmrEF [4.47(1.13-14.98), P < 0.01] groups, but not in the HFrEF group [1.20(0.59-2.43), P = 0.62].

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that RS after PCI could aggravate long-term prognosis of ischemic HF patients with moderate- to well-preserved EF, but not those with reduced EF.

摘要

背景

在缺血性心力衰竭患者中,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)并非总能实现完全血运重建。因此,本研究旨在阐明 PCI 后残余冠状动脉狭窄(RS)对缺血性心力衰竭(HF)患者预后的影响。

方法

我们分析了在我们的东北地区慢性心力衰竭分析和注册研究(CHART-2)中登记的 1307 例有症状的 HF 病史和 PCI 史的患者。RS 定义为最后一次冠状动脉造影时主要冠状动脉存在≥70%的管腔狭窄。

结果

在研究人群中,851 例(65.1%)患者存在 RS。在中位随访 3.2 年期间,即使在倾向评分匹配后,RS 患者的全因死亡率也高于无 RS 患者(21.9%比 11.6%,log-rank P=0.027)。多变量 Cox 风险分析也显示 RS 对缺血性 HF 患者全因死亡的负面影响[风险比(HR):1.62,95%置信区间(CI):1.07-2.46,P=0.024]。重要的是,当根据左心室射血分数(LVEF)将所有受试者分为三组[LVEF<40%(HFrEF)、LVEF 40-49%(HFmrEF)和 LVEF≥50%(HFpEF)]时,逆概率治疗加权法提供了类似的结果,即 PCI 后 RS 是 HFpEF [HR(95%CI);1.94(1.22-3.09),P<0.01]和 HFmrEF [4.47(1.13-14.98),P<0.01]组死亡的独立危险因素,但在 HFrEF 组中并非如此[1.20(0.59-2.43),P=0.62]。

结论

这些结果表明,PCI 后 RS 可加重 EF 中度至较好保留的缺血性 HF 患者的长期预后,但不能加重 EF 降低的患者的预后。

相似文献

1
Prognostic impact of residual stenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ischemic heart failure - A report from the CHART-2 study.缺血性心力衰竭患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后残余狭窄的预后影响 - CHART-2 研究报告。
Int J Cardiol. 2019 Mar 1;278:22-27. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.10.062. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
2
Characterization of heart failure patients with mid-range left ventricular ejection fraction-a report from the CHART-2 Study.心力衰竭伴有中间范围左心室射血分数患者的特征 - CHART-2 研究报告。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2017 Oct;19(10):1258-1269. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.807. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
3
Significance of Ischemic Heart Disease in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved, Midrange, and Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Nationwide Cohort Study.射血分数保留、中等范围和降低的心力衰竭患者中缺血性心脏病的意义:一项全国性队列研究
Circ Heart Fail. 2017 Jun;10(6). doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.117.003875.
4
Comparison of 5-Year Outcomes After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Heart Failure Patients With Versus Without Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (from the CREDO-Kyoto CABG Registry Cohort-2).左心室射血分数保留与未保留的心力衰竭患者冠状动脉旁路移植术后5年结局比较(来自CREDO-Kyoto CABG注册队列-2)
Am J Cardiol. 2015 Aug 15;116(4):580-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.05.020. Epub 2015 May 21.
5
Clinical characteristics, one-year change in ejection fraction and long-term outcomes in patients with heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction: a multicentre prospective observational study in Catalonia (Spain).伴有中间范围射血分数的心力衰竭患者的临床特征、射血分数一年变化及长期结局:在加泰罗尼亚(西班牙)进行的一项多中心前瞻性观察研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Dec 21;7(12):e018719. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018719.
6
Acute heart failure with mid-range left ventricular ejection fraction: clinical profile, in-hospital management, and short-term outcome.左心室射血分数中等范围的急性心力衰竭:临床特征、住院治疗及短期预后
Clin Res Cardiol. 2017 May;106(5):359-368. doi: 10.1007/s00392-016-1063-0. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
7
A comprehensive population-based characterization of heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction.具有中等范围射血分数的心力衰竭的综合人群特征描述。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2017 Dec;19(12):1624-1634. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.945. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
8
Epidemiology and one-year outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure and preserved, mid-range and reduced ejection fraction: an analysis of the ESC Heart Failure Long-Term Registry.慢性心力衰竭伴射血分数保留、中间范围和降低患者的流行病学和一年结局:ESC 心力衰竭长期注册研究分析。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2017 Dec;19(12):1574-1585. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.813. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
9
Facilitation of left ventricular function recovery post percutaneous coronary intervention by levosimendan.左西孟旦促进经皮冠状动脉介入术后左心室功能的恢复。
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Sep 20;168(1):237-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.09.088. Epub 2012 Oct 11.
10
Mid-range left ventricular ejection fraction: Clinical profile and cause of death in ambulatory patients with chronic heart failure.中等范围左心室射血分数:慢性心力衰竭门诊患者的临床特征及死因
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Aug 1;240:265-270. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.03.032. Epub 2017 Mar 9.

引用本文的文献

1
The Role of Myocardial Revascularization in Ischemic Heart Failure in the Era of Modern Optimal Medical Therapy.现代最佳药物治疗时代心肌血运重建在缺血性心力衰竭中的作用
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Aug 12;61(8):1451. doi: 10.3390/medicina61081451.
2
PCI in Patients With Heart Failure: Current Evidence, Impact of Complete Revascularization, and Contemporary Techniques to Improve Outcomes.心力衰竭患者的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:当前证据、完全血运重建的影响及改善预后的当代技术
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2022 Apr 11;1(2):100020. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100020. eCollection 2022 Mar-Apr.
3
Initial Invasive or Conservative Strategy in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction and Coronary Artery Disease.
射血分数保留的心力衰竭合并冠状动脉疾病的初始侵入性或保守策略
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Mar 18;9:822248. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.822248. eCollection 2022.
4
Residual Gensini Score Is Associated With Long-Term Cardiac Mortality in Patients With Heart Failure After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.残余Gensini评分与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后心力衰竭患者的长期心脏死亡率相关。
Circ Rep. 2020 Jan 28;2(2):89-94. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-19-0121.
5
Angiographic Complete versus Clinical Selective Incomplete Percutaneous Revascularization in Heart Failure Patients with Multivessel Coronary Disease.多支血管病变心力衰竭患者血管造影完全与临床选择性不完全经皮血运重建的比较。
J Interv Cardiol. 2020 Jul 27;2020:9506124. doi: 10.1155/2020/9506124. eCollection 2020.