• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

识别美国医疗保险欺诈在医疗服务提供者索赔数据中的方法。

Approaches for identifying U.S. medicare fraud in provider claims data.

机构信息

Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA.

出版信息

Health Care Manag Sci. 2020 Mar;23(1):2-19. doi: 10.1007/s10729-018-9460-8. Epub 2018 Oct 27.

DOI:10.1007/s10729-018-9460-8
PMID:30368641
Abstract

Quality and affordable healthcare is an important aspect in people's lives, particularly as they age. The rising elderly population in the United States (U.S.), with increasing number of chronic diseases, implies continuing healthcare later in life and the need for programs, such as U.S. Medicare, to help with associated medical expenses. Unfortunately, due to healthcare fraud, these programs are being adversely affected draining resources and reducing quality and accessibility of necessary healthcare services. The detection of fraud is critical in being able to identify and, subsequently, stop these perpetrators. The application of machine learning methods and data mining strategies can be leveraged to improve current fraud detection processes and reduce the resources needed to find and investigate possible fraudulent activities. In this paper, we employ an approach to predict a physician's expected specialty based on the type and number of procedures performed. From this approach, we generate a baseline model, comparing Logistic Regression and Multinomial Naive Bayes, in order to test and assess several new approaches to improve the detection of U.S. Medicare Part B provider fraud. Our results indicate that our proposed improvement strategies (specialty grouping, class removal, and class isolation), applied to different medical specialties, have mixed results over the selected Logistic Regression baseline model's fraud detection performance. Through our work, we demonstrate that improvements to current detection methods can be effective in identifying potential fraud.

摘要

高质量且负担得起的医疗保健是人们生活中的一个重要方面,尤其是随着年龄的增长。美国老年人口不断增加,慢性疾病数量不断增加,这意味着人们在以后的生活中需要继续医疗保健,并且需要美国医疗保险等计划来帮助支付相关的医疗费用。不幸的是,由于医疗保健欺诈,这些计划受到了不利影响,消耗了资源,降低了必要医疗服务的质量和可及性。检测欺诈行为对于能够识别并随后阻止这些犯罪者至关重要。可以利用机器学习方法和数据挖掘策略来改进当前的欺诈检测流程,并减少发现和调查可能的欺诈活动所需的资源。在本文中,我们采用了一种方法,根据执行的手术类型和数量来预测医生的预期专业。从这种方法中,我们生成了一个基线模型,比较了逻辑回归和多项式朴素贝叶斯,以测试和评估几种新方法来提高美国医疗保险 B 部分提供者欺诈的检测能力。我们的结果表明,我们提出的改进策略(专业分组、类别删除和类别隔离)应用于不同的医学专业,在选定的逻辑回归基线模型的欺诈检测性能方面具有不同的结果。通过我们的工作,我们证明了对当前检测方法的改进可以有效地识别潜在的欺诈行为。

相似文献

1
Approaches for identifying U.S. medicare fraud in provider claims data.识别美国医疗保险欺诈在医疗服务提供者索赔数据中的方法。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2020 Mar;23(1):2-19. doi: 10.1007/s10729-018-9460-8. Epub 2018 Oct 27.
2
The effects of varying class distribution on learner behavior for medicare fraud detection with imbalanced big data.不同类别分布对基于不平衡大数据的医疗保险欺诈检测中学习者行为的影响。
Health Inf Sci Syst. 2018 Sep 3;6(1):9. doi: 10.1007/s13755-018-0051-3. eCollection 2018 Dec.
3
Healthcare insurance fraud detection using data mining.利用数据挖掘进行医疗保险欺诈检测。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Apr 26;24(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02512-4.
4
Machine learning and the future of Medicare fraud detection.机器学习与医疗保险欺诈检测的未来。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 Aug;83(2):e133. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.03.059. Epub 2020 Mar 29.
5
Characteristics of Physicians Excluded From US Medicare and State Public Insurance Programs for Fraud, Health Crimes, or Unlawful Prescribing of Controlled Substances.因欺诈、医疗犯罪或非法开具受控物质而被美国医疗保险和州公共保险计划排除在外的医生的特征。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Dec 7;1(8):e185805. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.5805.
6
The false claims act and the eroding scienter in healthcare fraud litigation.《虚假索赔法》与医疗保健欺诈诉讼中逐渐削弱的明知故犯原则
Ann Health Law. 2011 Winter;20(1):49-76, 8 p preceding 1.
7
Identifying frauds and anomalies in Medicare-B dataset.识别医疗保险B数据集里的欺诈行为和异常情况。
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2017 Jul;2017:3664-3667. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2017.8037652.
8
Data-Centric AI for Healthcare Fraud Detection.用于医疗欺诈检测的以数据为中心的人工智能。
SN Comput Sci. 2023;4(4):389. doi: 10.1007/s42979-023-01809-x. Epub 2023 May 11.
9
Using data mining to find fraud in HCFA health care claims.利用数据挖掘技术查找医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心医疗保健索赔中的欺诈行为。
Top Health Inf Manage. 2001 Aug;22(1):1-13.
10
The bribery statute: a new weapon against Medicare fraud.反贿赂法规:打击医疗保险欺诈的新武器。
Healthc Financ Manage. 2001 Mar;55(3):44-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing Healthcare Integrity Using Simple Statistical Methods: Detecting Irregularities in Historical Dermatology Services Payments.使用简单统计方法提高医疗保健诚信度:检测皮肤科历史服务支付中的违规行为。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jun 18;13(12):1464. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13121464.
2
Fourteen years of manifestations and factors of health insurance fraud, 2006-2020: a scoping review.2006 - 2020年医疗保险欺诈的表现及因素十四年:一项范围综述
Health Justice. 2021 Sep 30;9(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s40352-021-00149-3.
3
A Risk Assessment Framework Proposal Based on Bow-Tie Analysis for Medical Image Diagnosis Sharing within Telemedicine.

本文引用的文献

1
Improving Fraud and Abuse Detection in General Physician Claims: A Data Mining Study.提高普通内科医生索赔中的欺诈和滥用检测:一项数据挖掘研究。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2015 Nov 10;5(3):165-72. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2015.196.
2
Does Medical School Training Relate to Practice? Evidence from Big Data.医学院校培训与实践相关吗?来自大数据的证据。
Big Data. 2015 Jun 1;3(2):103-113. doi: 10.1089/big.2014.0060.
3
Variability in Medicare utilization and payment among urologists.泌尿科医生在医疗保险使用和支付方面的差异。
基于蝴蝶结分析的远程医疗中医学图像诊断共享风险评估框架建议
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Apr 1;21(7):2426. doi: 10.3390/s21072426.
Urology. 2015 May;85(5):1045-1051. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.11.054. Epub 2015 Mar 4.
4
Balancing the goals of health care provision and financing.平衡医疗保健提供与融资的目标。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2006 Nov-Dec;25(6):1603-11. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.6.1603.