Suppr超能文献

物理治疗师和职业治疗师在痉挛评估与治疗方面的当前实践

Current Practices of Physical and Occupational Therapists Regarding Spasticity Assessment and Treatment.

作者信息

Blanchette Andréanne K, Demers Marika, Woo Kathleen, Shah Akash, Solomon John M, Mullick Aditi A, Levin Mindy F

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation, Université Laval.

Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Quebec City.

出版信息

Physiother Can. 2017;69(4):303-312. doi: 10.3138/ptc.2016-54.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to understand current trends in rehabilitation practice regarding spasticity assessment and treatment. The clinical practices of Canadian physiotherapists and occupational therapists in assessing and treating spasticity were investigated using a self-administered, Web-based questionnaire (cross-sectional design). Experienced clinicians developed the questionnaire, which surveyed socio-demographic characteristics, work environment, and clinician satisfaction with spasticity assessments and preferences for treatment. A total of 317 clinicians (204 physiotherapists and 113 occupational therapists) completed the questionnaire. The majority of participants reported that using valid and reliable outcome measures to assess spasticity was important (91.1%). Most clinicians indicated using a combination of spasticity assessments, and their level of satisfaction with these assessments was very high. All clinicians believed that spasticity should be evaluated by rehabilitation professionals, and most indicated that it should be assessed by more than one professional. Although 83.8% indicated that spasticity should be tested on admission, a much lower percentage believed that it should be evaluated throughout rehabilitation. Most clinicians (92.2%) reported using multiple treatment modalities for spasticity. This study is the first to document clinicians' practices regarding spasticity assessment and treatment. A better understanding of current trends in physiotherapy and occupational therapy will help in tailoring strategies to improve practice.

摘要

本研究的目的是了解目前在痉挛评估与治疗方面的康复实践趋势。采用基于网络的自填式问卷(横断面设计),对加拿大物理治疗师和职业治疗师在评估和治疗痉挛方面的临床实践进行了调查。经验丰富的临床医生设计了该问卷,调查了社会人口统计学特征、工作环境以及临床医生对痉挛评估的满意度和治疗偏好。共有317名临床医生(204名物理治疗师和113名职业治疗师)完成了问卷。大多数参与者报告称,使用有效且可靠的结果指标来评估痉挛很重要(91.1%)。大多数临床医生表示会结合多种痉挛评估方法,并且他们对这些评估的满意度很高。所有临床医生都认为痉挛应由康复专业人员进行评估,大多数人表示应由不止一名专业人员进行评估。尽管83.8%的人表示应在入院时对痉挛进行检测,但认为应在整个康复过程中进行评估的比例要低得多。大多数临床医生(92.2%)报告称使用多种治疗方式来治疗痉挛。本研究首次记录了临床医生在痉挛评估与治疗方面的实践情况。更好地了解物理治疗和职业治疗的当前趋势将有助于制定改善实践的策略。

相似文献

8
Current practice and clinical relevance of somatosensory assessment after stroke.
Clin Rehabil. 1999 Feb;13(1):48-55. doi: 10.1177/026921559901300107.
10
Occupational therapists' pain knowledge: a national survey.职业治疗师的疼痛知识:一项全国性调查。
Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(13):1309-17. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1090486. Epub 2015 Oct 20.

本文引用的文献

5
Management of spasticity revisited.重新审视痉挛的管理。
Age Ageing. 2013 Jul;42(4):435-41. doi: 10.1093/ageing/aft064.
7
Manual linear movements to assess spasticity in a clinical setting.手动线性运动评估临床痉挛状态。
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e53627. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053627. Epub 2013 Jan 15.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验