• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

时间而非空间注意捕获中的性别差异。

Sex Differences in Temporal but Not Spatial Attentional Capture.

作者信息

Inukai Tomoe, Kawahara Jun I

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Kobe Shinwa Women's University, Kobe, Japan.

Department of Psychology, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2018 Oct 12;9:1893. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01893. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01893
PMID:30369894
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6194159/
Abstract

The accuracy of detecting or identifying a target decreases when a salient distractor is presented. This decrease is explained by the temporal or spatial diversion of attention to the distractor and thus is referred to as attentional capture. Using temporal and spatial visual search tasks, we examined whether there are sex differences in attentional capture. In Experiment 1A, a temporal visual search task measured attentional capture in the temporal domain by asking participants (97 men and 92 women) to identify a target embedded in a rapid stream of nontarget letters while ignoring a preceding peripheral distractor. In Experiment 2, a spatial visual search task measured attentional capture in the spatial domain by asking participants (146 men and 83 women) to detect a target among spatially distributed nontarget items while ignoring a distractor presented simultaneously. Our results indicate that attentional capture occurred in both tasks. In Experiment 1A, the magnitude of capture was significantly larger for women than men. In Experiment 1B, we confirmed sex differences in temporal attentional capture by recruiting a new set of participants (141 men and 85 women). In Experiment 2, the magnitude of capture was comparable between the sexes. These results suggest that women are more sensitive to bottom-up signals than men when they engage in a temporal search task and could be explained in terms of sex differences in the ability of adjusting the size of attentional window, within which attention is allocated to the most salient item.

摘要

当呈现一个显著的干扰物时,检测或识别目标的准确性会降低。这种降低是由于注意力在时间或空间上被转移到干扰物上,因此被称为注意力捕获。我们使用时间和空间视觉搜索任务,研究了注意力捕获是否存在性别差异。在实验1A中,一个时间视觉搜索任务通过要求参与者(97名男性和92名女性)在忽略先前的外周干扰物的同时,在快速流动的非目标字母流中识别一个目标,来测量时间域中的注意力捕获。在实验2中,一个空间视觉搜索任务通过要求参与者(146名男性和83名女性)在忽略同时呈现的干扰物的同时,在空间分布的非目标项目中检测一个目标,来测量空间域中的注意力捕获。我们的结果表明,在这两个任务中都发生了注意力捕获。在实验1A中,女性的捕获幅度显著大于男性。在实验1B中,我们通过招募一组新的参与者(141名男性和85名女性)证实了时间注意力捕获中的性别差异。在实验2中,两性之间的捕获幅度相当。这些结果表明,女性在进行时间搜索任务时比男性对自下而上的信号更敏感,这可以从调整注意力窗口大小的能力的性别差异方面来解释,在这个窗口内,注意力被分配到最显著的项目上。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9233/6194159/5e52edfec81f/fpsyg-09-01893-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9233/6194159/94791c7423e3/fpsyg-09-01893-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9233/6194159/c82733373441/fpsyg-09-01893-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9233/6194159/c5dac646df6f/fpsyg-09-01893-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9233/6194159/c9e4695d047c/fpsyg-09-01893-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9233/6194159/edf1a74fcfa8/fpsyg-09-01893-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9233/6194159/5e52edfec81f/fpsyg-09-01893-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9233/6194159/94791c7423e3/fpsyg-09-01893-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9233/6194159/c82733373441/fpsyg-09-01893-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9233/6194159/c5dac646df6f/fpsyg-09-01893-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9233/6194159/c9e4695d047c/fpsyg-09-01893-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9233/6194159/edf1a74fcfa8/fpsyg-09-01893-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9233/6194159/5e52edfec81f/fpsyg-09-01893-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Sex Differences in Temporal but Not Spatial Attentional Capture.时间而非空间注意捕获中的性别差异。
Front Psychol. 2018 Oct 12;9:1893. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01893. eCollection 2018.
2
Search mode, not the attentional window, determines the magnitude of attentional capture.搜索模式而非注意窗口决定了注意捕获的程度。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Feb;86(2):457-470. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02582-4. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
3
No commonality between attentional capture and attentional blink.注意捕获和注意瞬脱之间没有共性。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2011 May;64(5):991-1008. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2010.524304. Epub 2010 Nov 26.
4
The Role of Top-Down Focused Spatial Attention in Preattentive Salience Coding and Salience-based Attentional Capture.自上而下的聚焦空间注意在预注意显著性编码和基于显著性的注意捕获中的作用。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Aug;28(8):1152-65. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00964. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
5
Target-nontarget similarity decreases search efficiency and increases stimulus-driven control in visual search.目标与非目标的相似性会降低视觉搜索中的搜索效率,并增强刺激驱动的控制。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Oct;79(7):2037-2043. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1367-9.
6
Attentional capture by salient distractors during visual search is determined by temporal task demands.注意捕获由显著干扰物在视觉搜索期间由时间任务需求决定。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Mar;24(3):749-59. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00127. Epub 2011 Aug 23.
7
Attentional capture in driving displays.驾驶显示器中的注意力捕捉
Br J Psychol. 2017 May;108(2):259-275. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12197. Epub 2016 Mar 28.
8
Distractor-Induced Blindness: A Special Case of Contingent Attentional Capture?干扰物诱发失明:偶然注意捕获的一个特殊案例?
Adv Cogn Psychol. 2017 Mar 31;13(1):52-63. doi: 10.5709/acp-0206-5. eCollection 2017.
9
Distinct roles of theta and alpha oscillations in the process of contingent attentional capture.θ波和α波振荡在偶发性注意捕获过程中的不同作用。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2023 Aug 7;17:1220562. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1220562. eCollection 2023.
10
Attentional capture during attentional awakening.注意力觉醒过程中的注意捕获。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 Jan;78(1):159-67. doi: 10.3758/s13414-015-0985-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Attention and predictions: control of spatial attention beyond the endogenous-exogenous dichotomy.注意与预测:超越内外源二分法的空间注意控制。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Oct 21;7:685. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00685. eCollection 2013.
2
Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy.自上而下与自下而上的注意控制:一个失败的理论二分法。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2012 Aug;16(8):437-43. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.06.010. Epub 2012 Jul 12.
3
The attention system of the human brain: 20 years after.人类大脑的注意系统:20 年后。
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2012;35:73-89. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-062111-150525. Epub 2012 Apr 12.
4
The time course of attentional capture under dual-task conditions.双重任务条件下注意捕获的时间进程。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Jan;73(1):15-23. doi: 10.3758/s13414-010-0017-2.
5
Attentional capture decreases when distractors remain visible during rapid serial visual presentations.当干扰项在快速序列视觉呈现期间保持可见时,注意力捕捉会减少。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 May;72(4):939-50. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.4.939.
6
Effects of age and sex on developmental neural networks of visual-spatial attention allocation.年龄和性别对视觉空间注意力分配发育性神经网络的影响。
Neuroimage. 2010 Jun;51(2):817-27. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.02.058. Epub 2010 Feb 25.
7
Sex differences in the processing of flankers.侧翼刺激加工中的性别差异。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Apr;63(4):633-8. doi: 10.1080/17470210903464253. Epub 2009 Dec 11.
8
Linear changes in the spatial extent of the focus of attention across time.注意力焦点的空间范围随时间的线性变化。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Aug;35(4):1020-31. doi: 10.1037/a0014258.
9
Is the exogenous orienting of spatial attention truly automatic? Evidence from unimodal and multisensory studies.空间注意的外源性定向真的是自动的吗?来自单峰和多感觉研究的证据。
Conscious Cogn. 2008 Sep;17(3):989-1015. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2008.02.006. Epub 2008 May 9.
10
The size of an attentional window modulates attentional capture by color singletons.注意窗口的大小会调节颜色单一元素对注意的捕获。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Oct;14(5):934-8. doi: 10.3758/bf03194124.