Suppr超能文献

大小写混合是否会妨碍词汇语义信息的获取?

Does CaSe-MiXinG disrupt the access to lexico-semantic information?

机构信息

Departamento de Metodología and ERI-Lectura, Universitat de València, Av. Blasco Ibáñez, 21, 46010, Valencia, Spain.

出版信息

Psychol Res. 2020 Jun;84(4):981-989. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1111-7. Epub 2018 Oct 28.

Abstract

Mixed-case WoRdS disrupt performance in word recognition tasks and sentence reading. There is, however, a controversial issue around this finding as the hindered performance could be related to impoverished lexico-semantic access or to lack of visual familiarity. The present experiments aim to examine whether there is a genuine mixed-case effect during lexico-semantic access or whether the effect is driven by a visual familiarity bias (i.e., lack of familiarity may induce a bias toward "no" responses in word/nonword decisions). Participants were presented with same-case vs. mixed-case items in a word/nonword discrimination task (lexical decision) and in a task that requires access to semantic information (semantic categorization). In lexical decision, responses were faster and more accurate to same-case words than to mixed-case words, whereas the nonwords showed the opposite pattern. In two semantic categorization experiments, we failed to find any signs of a case-mixing effect for words. Therefore, the case-mixing effect in word recognition is not due to an impoverished access to lexico-semantic information but rather to lack of visual familiarity.

摘要

混合大小写单词会干扰单词识别任务和句子阅读的表现。然而,关于这一发现存在争议,因为表现受阻可能与词汇语义获取不足有关,也可能与缺乏视觉熟悉度有关。本实验旨在检验在词汇语义获取过程中是否存在真正的混合大小写效应,或者这种效应是否由视觉熟悉度偏差(即缺乏熟悉度可能会导致在单词/非单词决策中偏向“否”的反应)驱动。参与者在词汇/非词汇辨别任务(词汇判断)和需要访问语义信息的任务(语义分类)中接受大小写相同的项目与大小写混合的项目。在词汇判断中,与大小写混合的单词相比,参与者对大小写相同的单词的反应更快、更准确,而非单词则呈现出相反的模式。在两个语义分类实验中,我们未能发现单词的任何大小写混合效应的迹象。因此,单词识别中的大小写混合效应不是由于词汇语义信息获取不足,而是由于缺乏视觉熟悉度。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验