Suppr超能文献

危重症老年烧伤患者的急性期反应。

Acute Phase Response in Critically Ill Elderly Burn Patients.

机构信息

Ross Tilley Burn Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2019 Feb;47(2):201-209. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003516.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Survival of elderly burn patients remains unacceptably poor. The acute phase, defined as the first 96 hours after burn, includes the resuscitation period and influences subsequent outcomes and survival. The aim of this study was to determine if the acute phase response post burn injury is significantly different in elderly patients compared with adult patients and to identify elements contributing to adverse outcomes.

DESIGN

Cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary burn center.

PATIENTS

Adult (< 65 yr old) and elderly (≥ 65 yr old) patients with an acute burn injury.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We included all patients with an acute burn injury greater than or equal to 20% total body surface area to our burn center from 2011 to 2016. Clinical and laboratory measures during the acute phase were compared between adult and elderly patients. Outcomes included clinical hemodynamic measurements, organ biomarkers, volume of fluid resuscitation, cardiac agents, and the inflammatory cytokine response in plasma. Data were analyzed using the Student t test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Fisher exact test. A total of 149 patients were included, with 126 adults and 23 elderly. Injury severity was not significantly different among adult and elderly patients. Elderly had significantly lower heart rates (p < 0.05), cardiac index (p < 0.05), mean arterial pressure (p < 0.05), PaO2/FIO2 (p < 0.05), and pH (p < 0.05), along with higher lactate (p < 0.05). Organ biomarkers, particularly creatinine and blood urea nitrogen, showed distinct differences between adults and elderly (p < 0.05). Elderly had significantly lower levels of interleukin-6, monocyte chemotactic protein-1, monocyte chemotactic protein-3, and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor during the acute phase (p < 0.05). Overall mortality was significantly higher in elderly patients (5% vs 52%; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Response to the burn injury during the acute phase response after burn is substantially different between elderly and adult burn patients and is characterized by cardiac depression and hypoinflammation.

摘要

目的

老年烧伤患者的存活率仍然很差。急性期定义为烧伤后 96 小时内,包括复苏期,会影响后续的结果和存活。本研究旨在确定老年烧伤患者与成年患者相比,烧伤后急性期反应是否有显著差异,并确定导致不良预后的因素。

设计

队列研究。

地点

三级烧伤中心。

患者

有急性烧伤损伤的成年(<65 岁)和老年(≥65 岁)患者。

干预措施

无。

测量和主要结果

我们将 2011 年至 2016 年期间我院烧伤中心收治的所有烧伤面积大于或等于 20%总体表面积的患者纳入本研究。比较了成年患者和老年患者在急性期的临床和实验室指标。结果包括临床血流动力学测量、器官标志物、液体复苏量、心脏药物和血浆中炎症细胞因子反应。数据采用学生 t 检验、Mann-Whitney U 检验和 Fisher 确切检验进行分析。共纳入 149 例患者,其中成年患者 126 例,老年患者 23 例。成年患者和老年患者的损伤严重程度无显著差异。老年患者的心率显著较低(p<0.05),心指数(p<0.05)、平均动脉压(p<0.05)、PaO2/FIO2(p<0.05)和 pH 值(p<0.05)较低,而乳酸水平较高(p<0.05)。器官标志物,特别是肌酐和血尿素氮,在成年患者和老年患者之间存在明显差异(p<0.05)。老年患者在急性期的白细胞介素-6、单核细胞趋化蛋白-1、单核细胞趋化蛋白-3 和粒细胞集落刺激因子水平显著较低(p<0.05)。老年患者的总死亡率明显较高(5%比 52%;p<0.0001)。

结论

烧伤后急性期反应,老年烧伤患者与成年烧伤患者的反应有显著差异,表现为心脏抑制和低炎症反应。

相似文献

1
Acute Phase Response in Critically Ill Elderly Burn Patients.
Crit Care Med. 2019 Feb;47(2):201-209. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003516.
2
Systemic hemodynamics, gastric intramucosal PCO2 changes, and outcome in critically ill burn patients.
Crit Care Med. 2000 Jun;28(6):1728-35. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200006000-00005.
4
[Effect of fluid resuscitation guided by pulse contour cardiac output monitoring technology on organ function in extremely severe burn patients].
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2020 Oct 20;36(10):939-946. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20190811-00345.
5
[Retrospective study on the characteristics of early organ injury in elderly patients with severe burns].
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2019 Mar 20;35(3):163-168. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2019.03.002.
6
Long term mortality in critically ill burn survivors.
Burns. 2017 Sep;43(6):1155-1162. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2017.05.010. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
7
Survivors versus nonsurvivors postburn: differences in inflammatory and hypermetabolic trajectories.
Ann Surg. 2014 Apr;259(4):814-23. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31828dfbf1.
8
[Establishment and validation of a risk prediction model for disseminated intravascular coagulation patients with electrical burns].
Zhonghua Shao Shang Yu Chuang Mian Xiu Fu Za Zhi. 2023 Aug 20;39(8):738-745. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20230419-00132.
9
Long-term persistance of the pathophysiologic response to severe burn injury.
PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e21245. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021245. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
10
Determination of burn patient outcome by large-scale quantitative discovery proteomics.
Crit Care Med. 2013 Jun;41(6):1421-34. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827c072e.

引用本文的文献

2
Delayed hepatic response and impaired cytokine dynamics in aged mice following burn injury: Implications for elderly patient care.
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 24;20(2):e0316813. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316813. eCollection 2025.
3
Cytokine Storm in a Massively Burned Pediatric Patient.
J Burn Care Res. 2025 Aug 12;46(3):674-677. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/iraf007.
4
Post-burn endocrine-immune dynamics and ageing considerations.
Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2024 Oct;20(10):567-568. doi: 10.1038/s41574-024-01018-3.
5
[Multicenter retrospect analysis of early clinical features and analysis of risk factors on prognosis of elderly patients with severe burns].
Zhonghua Shao Shang Yu Chuang Mian Xiu Fu Za Zhi. 2024 Mar 20;40(3):249-257. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20230808-00042.
6
The role and therapeutic potential of gut microbiome in severe burn.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022 Nov 17;12:974259. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.974259. eCollection 2022.
9
Adipose browning response to burn trauma is impaired with aging.
JCI Insight. 2021 Aug 23;6(16):e143451. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.143451.

本文引用的文献

2
Mechanisms and Therapeutic Relevance of Neuro-immune Communication.
Immunity. 2017 Jun 20;46(6):927-942. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.06.008.
3
Burn Care of the Elderly.
J Burn Care Res. 2017 May/Jun;38(3):e625-e628. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000535.
4
Neural regulation of immunity: molecular mechanisms and clinical translation.
Nat Neurosci. 2017 Feb;20(2):156-166. doi: 10.1038/nn.4477. Epub 2017 Jan 16.
5
Impaired Immune Response in Elderly Burn Patients: New Insights Into the Immune-senescence Phenotype.
Ann Surg. 2016 Jul;264(1):195-202. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001408.
6
Pathophysiologic Response to Burns in the Elderly.
EBioMedicine. 2015 Jul 31;2(10):1536-48. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2015.07.040. eCollection 2015 Oct.
7
Frailty score on admission predicts outcomes in elderly burn injury.
J Burn Care Res. 2015 Jan-Feb;36(1):1-6. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000190.
8
Benchmarking outcomes in the critically injured burn patient.
Ann Surg. 2014 May;259(5):833-41. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000438.
9
Outcome of acute kidney injury in severe burns: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Intensive Care Med. 2010 Jun;36(6):915-25. doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-1861-1. Epub 2010 Mar 24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验