Gondar Jô
Rua General Cristóvâo Barcelos, 24 ap. 701, Rio de Janeiro, CEP 22245-110, Brazil.
Am J Psychoanal. 2018 Dec;78(4):412-420. doi: 10.1057/s11231-018-9165-2.
In the 21st century, the notion of trauma is so commonly used that one can speak of a culture of trauma. Today, a wide variety of people claim victimhood, pointing to their traumas as validation. Fassin and Rechtman denounce the way in which recognition strategies make use of the identity of victim to justify compensation policies and financial reparations. This paper presents Sándor Ferenczi's contributions on trauma, showing how his theory takes into consideration relational and political aspects that were underemphasized by Freud. When Ferenczi is compared to contemporary recognition thinkers (such as Honneth, Fraser and Butler), one can see that what is at stake in his theory is neither identity nor victimization. It is deeper: Ferenczi shows the importance of the vulnerable dimension in all of us, suggesting that recognizing mutual vulnerability is a basis of the sense of connectedness and solidarity with the other.
在21世纪,创伤的概念被如此普遍地使用,以至于人们可以谈论创伤文化。如今,各种各样的人宣称自己是受害者,将他们的创伤作为正当理由。法辛和雷克特曼谴责了承认策略利用受害者身份来为赔偿政策和经济赔偿辩护的方式。本文介绍了桑多尔·费伦齐对创伤的贡献,展示了他的理论如何考虑到弗洛伊德所忽视的关系和政治方面。当将费伦齐与当代承认理论的思想家(如霍耐特、弗雷泽和巴特勒)进行比较时,可以看出他的理论所涉及的既不是身份认同也不是受害问题。其更为深刻:费伦齐表明了我们所有人中脆弱维度的重要性,暗示着认识到相互的脆弱性是与他人建立联系感和团结感的基础。