Department of Microbiology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, 3610 Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, PA, 19104-6076, USA.
Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Microbiome. 2018 Oct 30;6(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0575-4.
Historically, the human womb has been thought to be sterile in healthy pregnancies, but this idea has been challenged by recent studies using DNA sequence-based methods, which have suggested that the womb is colonized with bacteria. For example, analysis of DNA from placenta samples yielded small proportions of microbial sequences which were proposed to represent normal bacterial colonization. However, an analysis by our group showed no distinction between background negative controls and placenta samples. Also supporting the idea that the womb is sterile is the observation that germ-free mammals can be generated by sterile delivery of neonates into a sterile isolator, after which neonates remain germ-free, which would seem to provide strong data in support of sterility of the womb.
To probe this further and to investigate possible placental colonization associated with spontaneous preterm birth, we carried out another study comparing microbiota in placenta samples from 20 term and 20 spontaneous preterm deliveries. Both 16S rRNA marker gene sequencing and shotgun metagenomic sequencing were used to characterize placenta and control samples. We first quantified absolute amounts of bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequences using 16S rRNA gene quantitative PCR (qPCR). As in our previous study, levels were found to be low in the placenta samples and indistinguishable from negative controls. Analysis by DNA sequencing did not yield a placenta microbiome distinct from negative controls, either using marker gene sequencing as in our previous work, or with shotgun metagenomic sequencing. Several types of artifacts, including erroneous read classifications and barcode misattribution, needed to be identified and removed from the data to clarify this point.
Our findings do not support the existence of a consistent placental microbiome, in either placenta from term deliveries or spontaneous preterm births.
从历史上看,人们认为健康妊娠中的子宫是无菌的,但最近使用基于 DNA 序列的方法进行的研究对这一观点提出了挑战,这些研究表明子宫内存在细菌定植。例如,对胎盘样本的 DNA 分析产生了微生物序列的小比例,这些序列被认为代表正常的细菌定植。然而,我们小组的分析显示,背景阴性对照与胎盘样本之间没有区别。同样支持子宫无菌的观点是,无菌分娩将新生儿送入无菌隔离器中可以产生无菌的哺乳动物,此后新生儿保持无菌,这似乎提供了支持子宫无菌的有力数据。
为了进一步探究这一点,并研究与自发性早产相关的可能胎盘定植,我们进行了另一项研究,比较了 20 例足月和 20 例自发性早产分娩的胎盘样本中的微生物群。我们使用 16S rRNA 标记基因测序和鸟枪法宏基因组测序来描述胎盘和对照样本。我们首先使用 16S rRNA 基因定量 PCR(qPCR)定量测定细菌 16S rRNA 基因序列的绝对数量。与我们之前的研究一样,在胎盘样本中发现水平较低,与阴性对照无法区分。DNA 测序分析既没有使用我们之前的工作中使用的标记基因测序,也没有使用鸟枪法宏基因组测序,从阴性对照中得到独特的胎盘微生物组。需要识别并从数据中去除几种类型的伪影,包括错误的读分类和条形码错配,以澄清这一点。
我们的研究结果不支持在足月分娩或自发性早产的胎盘样本中存在一致的胎盘微生物组。